When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That's bad if you need a 5.8 EEC because there was no 5.8/4R70w combo from the factory. But as stated if your truck is mass air then you don't need to worry because the computer can adapt to a 5.8 anyway.
There is a sensor - the MAF meter - in the intake between the air filter and the throttle body that the computer uses to measure the amount of air coming into the engine. Once the computer knows how much air is coming down the intake it can set the injectors to fire at the rate that will add a matching amount of fuel. The older system that Ford used before MAF is MAP (manifold air pressure) which uses a sensor to measure the vacuum in the intake. With this info plus other sensor data it can make a good guess as to the load on the engine and add the appropriate amount of fuel. MAF is faster to react, makes better guesses and doesn't get as confused when major changes are made to the intake or cam.
What automatic tranny's can bolt up to a 351? I see the AOD cannot or is not recommended.
Any small block pattern transmission will bolt up including the AOD, and whether it lasts or not depends heavily on it's relative health. The AOD in my truck still works fine after about 8 years behind a 5.8, it was a fresh rebuild with a shift kit when the 5.8 was installed.
Any small block pattern transmission will bolt up including the AOD, and whether it lasts or not depends heavily on it's relative health. The AOD in my truck still works fine after about 8 years behind a 5.8, it was a fresh rebuild with a shift kit when the 5.8 was installed.
was the AOD stock? did ford roll out any of those combo's from the factory? that is a 351 coupled with an AOD?
There were no factory 5.8/AOD combos in trucks but it was found in the Crown Vic. My transmission is a stock rebuild to the latest spec* and has a valve body shift kit installed.
*All tranmsissions get upgrades over their production life and the AOD is no exception, later versions got larger bands and servos and the main clutch drums were changed to allow more clutch disks. If you're shopping for one you want a '91+ tranmsission as it will have some or all of these updates and will also be compatable with the better aftermarket parts.
i'm hopefully several years off from needing a new tranny or engine but was fascinated as to what would be involved in upgrading from my 302 and AOD combo.
Seems like it would be a lot of work to make a switch to a 351 and a proper tranny if I were to opt for this route.
Off the top of my head potential needs:
-different transfer case
-new driveshafts
-trans crossmember
-351 computer
-351 COMPLETE motor.
that's a lot of cost and a lot of work vs replacing the stock parts with other OE type equipment.
Seems like it would be a lot of work to make a switch to a 351 and a proper tranny if I were to opt for this route.
Being an '86 it's a bit more complicated but you don't need to replace any of the drivetrain to use a 5.8. You do need a complete 5.8EFI and a 5.8 EEC, and you will also need to make some wiring changes since the harness is pinned out a bit differently on that truck versus the later truck that you would be pulling the 5.8 EEC from.
I guess I'll be the lone decenter here, but I preferred the 302 in our '93 Bronco to the 5.8 in the '94 Bronco we just bought. I was getting 15-16 MPG with the 302, and about 12 w/the 351. The 302 pulled our boat a couple of times (5500 lbs w/trailer), and it did fine. I think it depends on what you are going to be using it for. For a truck that won't be used to tow much or haul around a lot in the bed, I like the 302. If you're going to work it hard, the 351 might make more sense. But both motors feel underpowered compared to the newer motors like my 5.4. My 351 does run like a dream, though.
I guess I'll be the lone decenter here, but I preferred the 302 in our '93 Bronco to the 5.8 in the '94 Bronco we just bought. I was getting 15-16 MPG with the 302, and about 12 w/the 351. The 302 pulled our boat a couple of times (5500 lbs w/trailer), and it did fine. I think it depends on what you are going to be using it for. For a truck that won't be used to tow much or haul around a lot in the bed, I like the 302. If you're going to work it hard, the 351 might make more sense. But both motors feel underpowered compared to the newer motors like my 5.4. My 351 does run like a dream, though.
I disagree on one point. Towing a baler with the neighbor's Triton w/auto and 3.55 gears was a lot less agreeable than towing the same baler with our 351+C6 with 3.08 gears.
But both motors feel underpowered compared to the newer motors like my 5.4.
Yes.. all stock these old motors are down on power compared to the new modulars, but it's pretty easy to make up that and more with some simple upgrades.
I dunno about simple upgrades. If you want more power on a newer truck you buy a chip. But on these older trucks it takes alot of work to get an extra 25 ponies.