When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
An 8.8 is not a bad rear end but if you can get a 9 inch I think that is the way to go.
They are not offered by Ford any longer, but there is a ton of aftermarket parts for
the 9 inch. The biggest advantage to me is the ease of changing gear ratios and
differentials in the 9 inch vs the 8.8.
Rogue_Wulff, I'll check that out thanks. And just to throw one more stupid Ford fact into this off topic conversation. Those 7 lug wheels, axle, etc. where offered as a factory high payload F-150 option ever sence that silly 98 LD F-250 at least up till the last time I was selling Fords in 2008. And IIRC there was also a Ranger off-road package option in about 2001 that had those 7 lug wheels also.
I do believe the thread starter has gotten most any info he needed, and doesn't mind us getting off on a bit of tangent, since he's likely very aware that should another question arise, we'll gladly jump right back on topic.
As for the whole 7 lug thing, I just never paid any attention, since the last decent looking F150 was built in 1996......
Of course I don't mind! Listening to you guys is how I learn. And you're right, I believe I do have what I need now to go back this weekend and pick out the right rearend. I really appreciate the time and advice I get from from everyone here.
as to other stuff - the 8.8 is way quieter than a 9", and a 9" cannot be sealed against leaks - ever. 8.8 brakes will fit on he 9 and vice versa, BUT, the drums only go one way - the 9" drums do not have a hole large enuf to clear the 8.8 axle end. wheel cylinders and shoes and kits are the same.
3.55 CAN be had in the 9", cuz the 4x4s mostly used a dana 44 with 3.54 (dana had their own agenda...)
if I had it to do over, I would put a 3.08 8.8 - woulda given me the great shot in the arm torque still, dropped a few hundred highway rpm, and been easier to get a speedo gear to match up.
is your 4spd the srod? if so you need to find the left handed gears to swap. go 3.55 you need to change the drive as well as driven gear to get speedo on....(Im 10.5% off) - see my project page for links and stuff.
3.55 CAN be had in the 9", cuz the 4x4s mostly used a dana 44 with 3.54 (dana had their own agenda...)
Actually, the 4wd with D44 and 9" used 3.50 gears (3.00 was also available). I have a set of those axles with the 3.50 gears that are going under my 80 F150.
You have to look real hard to find the 3.50 ratio for the D44, but even dana admits that it exists.
This doesn't mean that someone, somewhere, offers a 3.55 gearset for the 9", but ford didn't. I guess they were just way too fond of that 12 tooth pinion gear.......
I had a 9" in 2.47 (2.50) open that I replaced with a 3L55 8.8 (3.55 with limited slip)
Wow IMO that is going backwards, 3 steps back to go 2 forward.
Originally Posted by quaddriver
...... a 9" cannot be sealed against leaks - ever......
I've never had an issue with a 9 leaking, I can only assume you mean between the housing and 3rd member? You really just need a little RTV there, and 8.8s have issues with axle seals.
Actually, the 4wd with D44 and 9" used 3.50 gears (3.00 was also available). I have a set of those axles with the 3.50 gears that are going under my 80 F150.
You have to look real hard to find the 3.50 ratio for the D44, but even dana admits that it exists.
This doesn't mean that someone, somewhere, offers a 3.55 gearset for the 9", but ford didn't. I guess they were just way too fond of that 12 tooth pinion gear.......
You dont have to look too hard....Im loosing track on what the topic was, but the D44 front gearset in 3.50 is part 707240-5X in 42-12, the more popular D44 (IFS or not) 3.54 has 4 or 5 part numbers, including reverse gearsets for the jeeper crowd - for ford the gearset would be 706517-3x or 707020-3x. in 46-13 IIRC
I was under the impression his truck was 2wd - if not a 2.50/2.50 axle ratio would suck in a 4x4 - with a 6.
btw correct me if I am wrong but a 3.50 9" is 35-10 and the 370 is 37-10 - in axles with large possible gear ranges, there are usually what they call 'large carrier' and 'small carrier' models - even tho they are essenitally the same size. its based on there the bolt holes are located a certain distance from the tooth load point - since the carrier is fixed in size and the bolt holes go in one place, the ring grows or shrinks slightly (go find a GM corp 10 bolt in 2.73 and 3.23 (like a caprice sedan vs caprice wagon with TT) and you will see what I mean)
long story short, I believe you will find ack! my post was truncated!
Last edited by quaddriver; Jun 30, 2010 at 02:34 PM.
Reason: it got posted funny!
A 2 dollar paper gasket between the housing and pig (3rd member) is all thats needed to have a perfect seal!
I have changed thousands of pigs (I'm a racer) and rarely have a leaker, I do not use Sillycone!
Remove all paint and contaminants ... Including gear oil, If any residual oil remains on the sealing surface it will become a weeper, Especially if it's Synthetic oil.
Do not use bolts, use studs and apply a _little_ loctite on the studs in the housing and allow to dry before assembly.
I've never had an issue with a 9 leaking, I can only assume you mean between the housing and 3rd member? You really just need a little RTV there, and 8.8s have issues with axle seals.
nossir. the end seals. 9"ers are famous for letting the lube flow freely - circle track guys have more of an issue cuz of the centrifugal force...such that they fill the seal cups with heavy grease etc, but the leaks will return on a street machine.
its anecdotal but I have NEVER EVER seen an 8.8 damp anywhere in my shop, other than the cover gasket and sometimes under the pinion seal on the high mileage jobbers. (granted the 8.8 is a much newer design and machined a lot closer due to modern blah blah blah)
hit your boneyard and photograph all the 9"ers you see - they will be wet in 4 places: both ends, pinion and 3rd member joint
(oddly, D44s almost never leak, on even on the IFS jobs where the stub shaft exits)
its anecdotal but I have NEVER EVER seen an 8.8 damp anywhere in my shop, other than the cover gasket and sometimes under the pinion seal on the high mileage jobbers.
Hmm things must work different on opposite coasts kinda like toilets turning the other way in the south. Cause I have NEVER EVER seen oily brakes on a 9 anywhere in my shop, but have seen many leaking 8.8s.
I can beleive circle track guys having an issue, my friends that run circle track haven't mentioned it to me, but most of them have to use C-clip axles in their class and use eleminators. But I can't see the leak coming from the seal itself but between the flange, backing plate, and ratainer.
Originally Posted by quaddriver
btw correct me if I am wrong but a 3.50 9" is 35-10 and the 370 is 37-10 - in axles with large possible gear ranges, there are usually what they call 'large carrier' and 'small carrier' models - even tho they are essenitally the same size. its based on there the bolt holes are located a certain distance from the tooth load point - since the carrier is fixed in size and the bolt holes go in one place, the ring grows or shrinks slightly (go find a GM corp 10 bolt in 2.73 and 3.23 (like a caprice sedan vs caprice wagon with TT) and you will see what I mean)
I'm not totaly sure what your getting at here, but the carrier split is beacause the ring gear get's too thick or thin as the pinion must get larger or smaller in diameter to accomidate the ratio. Because of this the mounting surface for the ring gear is moved left or right on the carrier. Take the 9 for example, pretty sure the split is 3.73 but you can get thick gears to put 4.10s on a 3.73 and down carrier but not the other way around because the ring is to thin.
You dont have to look too hard....Im loosing track on what the topic was, but the D44 front gearset in 3.50 is part 707240-5X in 42-12, the more popular D44 (IFS or not) 3.54 has 4 or 5 part numbers, including reverse gearsets for the jeeper crowd - for ford the gearset would be 706517-3x or 707020-3x. in 46-13 IIRC
I was under the impression his truck was 2wd - if not a 2.50/2.50 axle ratio would suck in a 4x4 - with a 6.
btw correct me if I am wrong but a 3.50 9" is 35-10 and the 370 is 37-10 - in axles with large possible gear ranges, there are usually what they call 'large carrier' and 'small carrier' models - even tho they are essenitally the same size. its based on there the bolt holes are located a certain distance from the tooth load point - since the carrier is fixed in size and the bolt holes go in one place, the ring grows or shrinks slightly (go find a GM corp 10 bolt in 2.73 and 3.23 (like a caprice sedan vs caprice wagon with TT) and you will see what I mean)
long story short, I believe you will find ack! my post was truncated!
You know, I'm not 100% sure what the 9" 3.50 used. I know the dana 44 uses a 42-12, and that *may* have been the one I was thinking of.
But, the 9" has many ratios that do use a 12 pinion (2.75, 3.00, 3.25) so I assumed (yes, I know) that the 3.50 would as well, since it would be a simple as adding another tooth to the ring, pretty doable, since the 4.10 is frequently a 41-10.
Perhaps both the 42-12 and 35-10 have been used, depending on manufacturer and/or year.
Personally, I've never had an axle or pinion seal leak on a 9" that wasn't caused by A) bad seal, B) bad bearing(s) or C) plugged vent. Maybe I'm just lucky. Or, perhaps the racers you are speaking of use the sealed bearings, and either don't put the seal inside the housing before axle, or put too much weld on the lock ring, and damaged that seal.....
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.