Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Exhaust question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #1  
Uncle Ethan's Avatar
Uncle Ethan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico, finally
Exhaust question

For my 1979 F350 4x4 w/6.6 engine, when using the factory exhaust manifolds should I have the muffler shop bend 2 1/2 " tubing from the manifolds into a 3" main pipe and continue the 3" through the muffler and out the back?
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #2  
mark a.'s Avatar
mark a.
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,922
Likes: 153
If thats what you want to do. I don't see anything wrong with it.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #3  
Uncle Ethan's Avatar
Uncle Ethan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico, finally
If that will reduce back pressure and help the engine to function better without the expense and trouble of headers and the more expensive and tricked out exhaust systems, then that seems the most sensible way to go. I want to spend what is necessary to remove the body rust permanently, repaint the truck, and I am in process advancing the cam to non-Califonia factory specs.
The use I will make of my truck makes the expense of aluminum heads, 4bbl intake, cam, and headers for just cruising down the highway and four wheeling out to hunting sites seem to be money spent that could go for gas. if you have any suggestions for where to go to buy aluminized exhaust pipes to do what I described please let me know. thanks
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 12:08 AM
  #4  
Kennewick's Avatar
Kennewick
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 511
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Uncle Ethan
For my 1979 F350 4x4 w/6.6 engine, when using the factory exhaust manifolds should I have the muffler shop bend 2 1/2 " tubing from the manifolds into a 3" main pipe and continue the 3" through the muffler and out the back?
You can't flow more than your smallest restriction. Also you will loose exhaust velocity and this will cool the gases and cause undue condensation in the pipes (rust) In addition the loss of velocity will kill your scavanging effect and the added cooled gasses are heavy and will cause additional back pressure trying to push the heavier charge out. You could increase to 3" at the muffler to reduce muffler restriction. Some say reduce 1 size for the tail pipe and some say go bigger. My opinnion is to increase at the muffler and stay the same going out to maintain velocity and scavanging.
It will actually work better if you dump as soon as possible after the muffler but thats a call you have to make for what your looking for and sound control.
Of course this is for stock mani's. I use an H pipe and if you do connect as close as you can (stuff in the way) and no more than 1 size smaller.
You might get better performance by going with a 2 (2.5) into one y (3" out) with a high flow muff, 3"" into 3" out the tail. These systems work with differant physics and scavange like crazy. They can sound bad *** too. Scavanging can massivly increase air flow through the carb.
My 2 cents.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 07:56 AM
  #5  
Uncle Ethan's Avatar
Uncle Ethan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico, finally
Originally Posted by Kennewick
You can't flow more than your smallest restriction. Also you will loose exhaust velocity and this will cool the gases and cause undue condensation in the pipes (rust) In addition the loss of velocity will kill your scavanging effect and the added cooled gasses are heavy and will cause additional back pressure trying to push the heavier charge out. You could increase to 3" at the muffler to reduce muffler restriction. Some say reduce 1 size for the tail pipe and some say go bigger. My opinnion is to increase at the muffler and stay the same going out to maintain velocity and scavanging.
It will actually work better if you dump as soon as possible after the muffler but thats a call you have to make for what your looking for and sound control.
Of course this is for stock mani's. I use an H pipe and if you do connect as close as you can (stuff in the way) and no more than 1 size smaller.
You might get better performance by going with a 2 (2.5) into one y (3" out) with a high flow muff, 3"" into 3" out the tail. These systems work with differant physics and scavange like crazy. They can sound bad *** too. Scavanging can massivly increase air flow through the carb.
My 2 cents.
Your final suggestion is what I was trying to say. If I go out from the stock manifolds with 2 1/2 dia. pipe into a Y which has a 3" outlet and into a magnaflow or some such that is quiet, and continue out with 3" pipe. I would have to see how long the muffler is to direct the final exhaust. I might be able to dump it just before the rear tire [passenger side], but probably will have to go out after the tire. After I got up to a minimum of $3K but probably more like $5K for all the engine mods I was planning the result was lots of power and torque [25% increase approx] but only a 2MPG increase in milage I looked at how much gas that amount of money would buy, I was looking at about 12,000 miles worth of gas. In the last 15 years I have only put on 20,000 miles, so I just couldn't see going crazy on the engine. Now, if I was still in my forties it might make sense, but I figure I will wear out about the same time as the truck so maybe a grandson will get to do the mods.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
clhart426
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
43
Sep 9, 2019 11:12 PM
FordYoungGun35
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Dec 10, 2012 01:24 PM
bradley639
6.2L V8
9
Feb 26, 2012 07:16 PM
edseldude
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Aug 25, 2003 09:22 AM
James Gatling
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
5
Jan 14, 2000 05:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 PM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE