Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Banjo Bolt Fuel Mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #31  
Big_Red_1993_F250's Avatar
Big_Red_1993_F250
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Bump for an afternoon read.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 01:24 PM
  #32  
DSMMH's Avatar
DSMMH
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 20
My .02 worth

With regards to the banjo bolt check valve. It will restrict fuel flow through the bolt. Whenever a restriction is removed from any liquid line, the flow will increase. Removing it will improve fuel flow to the heads. I bought new bolts from Ford and they did not have any valves in them. I have not had time to do the mod so I do not even know if I have the right bolts. I suspect I do not since the threads do not match the plugs I removed when I put the cross over line mod in. Will probably do mod tomorrow.

Anyway, I believe the semi check valve bolt design is for the following reason. When the motor stops, the fuel system pressure immediately goes to zero. If you pressurize a liquid then released the pressure quickly, you get "backflow". If the valve is not there, then I believe the possibility exists for the fuel rail to not be full of fuel due to backflow on the next startup. The banjo bolt check valve SLOWLY releases the pressure so the fuel rail remians full of fuel for the next start.

Now I have a special case. I have an Airdog 2 fuel pump. I no longer have fuel return from the engine filter bowl to the fuel tank since the AD2 has it own tank return and fuel pressure regulator. So I removed the fuel bowl return fitting, drilled and tapped it for 1/4-20 threads and put a bolt in it with a copper seal. Worked great! So I have a "dead end" fuel system from my AD2 to the motor. There was no sense in sending treated fuel to the fuel bowl just to have it returned to the tank.

FWIW - I believe the ideal 6.0 fuel system is to have the HFCM pump fuel directly to the fuel bowl, block off the return line as I described above, remove the head's rear fuel rail plugs, tie both heads to a common line, connect that common line to a fuel pressure regulator and connect the regulator back to the tank fuel return line at the HFCM. This does two good things: gives better fuel pressure regulation since the regulator is after the FI and not before and prevents any FI fuel starvation.

DSMMH
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 02:08 PM
  #33  
smokersteve's Avatar
smokersteve
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 2
From: CA Sacramento
If the valves in the bolts prevent dry start from the fuel moving away from the injectors, then what replaces the fuel in the fuel rail?

The pump pressurises with in 4 sec of key on.

If there is a dry start then what is replacing the fuel? air??.... fuel leak???
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #34  
Big_Red_1993_F250's Avatar
Big_Red_1993_F250
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
cheezit pm'd me a few days ago and said he still had some thoughts on this so I want to see his opinion on the back flow. The fuel rail reaches equilibrium at atmospheric pressure when the truck shuts off but it does not induce air into the rail by releasing the pressure. The pump stops applying force on the fluid, simply P=Ff/Ac, no fluid force=no gauge pressure.

Derek
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #35  
w_huisman's Avatar
w_huisman
Elder User
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: IA MN SD
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by smokersteve
If the valves in the bolts prevent dry start from the fuel moving away from the injectors, then what replaces the fuel in the fuel rail?

The pump pressurises with in 4 sec of key on.

If there is a dry start then what is replacing the fuel? air??.... fuel leak???
When the pump shuts down, the entire fuel system instantaneously drops to the pressure in the fuel tank. So whether the restriction through the banjo bolts is a 3/8" hole or a pin hole is insignificant because the pressure instantaneously (speed of sound in water +/-) bleeds back to the tank through the pump. You can see that with fuel pressure gauge. The needle drops as fast as the mechanical gauge allows it when the engine is shut down. There's nowhere for air to enter the system and displace fuel at shutdown in a healthy fuel system, so air is not the issue..

When the engine is running and fuel is flowing, the restrictive check valve would most definitely reduce/eliminate pressure surges caused by injector firing, preventing them from traveling further back through the system. (Pressure surges don't care which direction the fluid is flowing.) The waves would only be allowed to run back and forth in the fuel rail. At 1400 m/s (about the speed of sound in water), a pressure wave bouncing back and forth through a 18" long tube may equate to a constant pressure, as far as an injector is concerned.

Maybe removing the restriction allows the wave to run back through the system to the pump or some other restriction back down the like, making the wave return time long enough that it becomes significant to the injectors.

Just a swag. I'm getting a headache.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #36  
Big_Red_1993_F250's Avatar
Big_Red_1993_F250
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
The pressure waves (infinitesimally small) will not move the check valve at all. They are called "normal shocks" in thermodynamics and can be associated with breaking the sound barrier as well. These waves travel within the fluid medium. A check valve is not a hydraulic attenuation device so it doesn't do anything to stop pulse waves. Just my $.02 from an eng. standpoint.

Derek
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #37  
w_huisman's Avatar
w_huisman
Elder User
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: IA MN SD
Club FTE Silver Member

Post deleted. Carry on.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #38  
william_04_x's Avatar
william_04_x
Lead Driver
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,139
Likes: 209
Club FTE Silver Member

The debate is great, but what kind of gains do you guys expect?

Injector demand can easily exceed the flow rate of the HFCM with a tune, then the plumbing becomes a mute point.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #39  
smokersteve's Avatar
smokersteve
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 2
From: CA Sacramento
[quote=w_huisman;8715203]When the pump shuts down, the entire fuel system instantaneously drops to the pressure in the fuel tank. So whether the restriction through the banjo bolts is a 3/8" hole or a pin hole is insignificant because the pressure instantaneously (speed of sound in water +/-) bleeds back to the tank through the pump. You can see that with fuel pressure gauge. The needle drops as fast as the mechanical gauge allows it when the engine is shut down. There's nowhere for air to enter the system and displace fuel at shutdown in a healthy fuel system, so air is not the issue..[quote]





if there is no air in the lines then how can there be dry starts if the fuel is still there, and once the key is on the pressure is back up.

"How can there be dry starts if the fuel is still there?" that is my main question to the ones who feel that removing the valves can create dry starts even though the fuel is still where it needs to be(if there are no leaks)

The only way I can see dry starts is if they quickly start the truck, or a fuel leak
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #40  
Big_Red_1993_F250's Avatar
Big_Red_1993_F250
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by william_04_x
The debate is great, but what kind of gains do you guys expect?

Injector demand can easily exceed the flow rate of the HFCM with a tune, then the plumbing becomes a mute point.
I agree, a banjo bolt mod is not the be all-end all of fuel mods, that's for sure. But for the convenience you can't beat it, the previous orifice was 2 @ 3mm vs the new orifice of 3 @ 5mm. The smallest cross sectional area is the banjo bolt, pressure is force over cross sectional area. If you upgrade the banjo bolt then the next restriction is the lines. Instead of building pressure at the orifice of the banjo bolt, you can now be assured that the pressure is being built within the head itself and there is far less restriction at the bolt itself.

I like where this is going, if we can all agree the check valves are useless we might get onto the next fuel restrictions. The stock pump can produce ~100 psi, just decide where you want it to build that pressure... let's think about it.

Derek
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 08:00 PM
  #41  
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
Post Fiend
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 35
From: N. Fort Worth, tx
Club FTE Silver Member

if we can all agree the check valves are useless we might get onto the next fuel restrictions.
im still not there.
Im gonna sit back a little bit and see what else I can dig up on the issue. Like I said its interesting. I know what they were ment to do. I have not see or had to do any testing in a engine with them gone yet.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 08:12 PM
  #42  
Big_Red_1993_F250's Avatar
Big_Red_1993_F250
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cheezit
if we can all agree the check valves are useless we might get onto the next fuel restrictions.
im still not there.
Im gonna sit back a little bit and see what else I can dig up on the issue. Like I said its interesting. I know what they were ment to do. I have not see or had to do any testing in a engine with them gone yet.
Story of my life... Mechanic vs. Eng... I know we have a bad rap... But, I am sure glad I grew up on a farm here in S.W. Ontario, I don't only design machines, I turn on 'em.

cheezit, I wanna hear everything you've got. I strive to be a book of knowledge. PM me?

Derek
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #43  
smokersteve's Avatar
smokersteve
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 2
From: CA Sacramento
at first I was unsure of the upgrade by the dry start issue, but there is no way there can be a dry start from the way I see it with a normal functioning fuel system, no leaks and pausing after key on,
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 08:31 PM
  #44  
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
Post Fiend
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 35
From: N. Fort Worth, tx
Club FTE Silver Member

naw no hatered at all I deal with the guy how make this stuff more then I care to sometimes. all of have been good people. funny is when they call they always ask what we know.
my issue is my knowledge of hydrolics and fliud dynamics is limited. I have no issue with stating that at all.

I can agree its a restriction, I dont agree on the uslessness of it. Its there to prevent a backwards pluse from being sent back to the fuel bowl. is it effective in that.. I dont know. I do know that unwanted pules in the fuel system are not wanted and will damage injectors. This valve may very well be a reason that when exhust pulse enters the fuel system it does not spred to the uneffected bank. this tie in to my opinion of tie the rear ports at the back of the head tohether as well. Looping the fuel system together will only serve to add the risk of debree transfer, damaging more injectors if you have an issue with exhaust in the fuel rail, etc. also if we look at the system we would have equal pressure built up in the center between the 2 heads. as pressure is going to be equal to both banks anyway by design.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #45  
Big_Red_1993_F250's Avatar
Big_Red_1993_F250
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cheezit
naw no hatered at all I deal with the guy how make this stuff more then I care to sometimes. all of have been good people. funny is when they call they always ask what we know.
my issue is my knowledge of hydrolics and fliud dynamics is limited. I have no issue with stating that at all.

I can agree its a restriction, I dont agree on the uslessness of it. Its there to prevent a backwards pluse from being sent back to the fuel bowl. is it effective in that.. I dont know. I do know that unwanted pules in the fuel system are not wanted and will damage injectors. This valve may very well be a reason that when exhust pulse enters the fuel system it does not spred to the uneffected bank. this tie in to my opinion of tie the rear ports at the back of the head tohether as well. Looping the fuel system together will only serve to add the risk of debree transfer, damaging more injectors if you have an issue with exhaust in the fuel rail, etc. also if we look at the system we would have equal pressure built up in the center between the 2 heads. as pressure is going to be equal to both banks anyway by design.
I know you know this but what are the last 2 firing cylinders in the cycle. 6 then 8 correct? They are both on the same side, correct? So 6 takes a good "gulp" before 8 does, then what. A pulse wave traveling at the speed of sound is located how many inches away from the banjo bolts, a spring loaded check valve can't help. You need a hydraulic attenuator similar to that found in the HP oil rail. There are so many pulses @ 2000 RPM that this can be considered a static pressure within the fuel rail, honestly.

Derek
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE