1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MAF Conversion clarification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-11-2010, 09:06 AM
special_k's Avatar
special_k
special_k is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAF Conversion clarification

Same old topic keeps coming up over and over again.

I did a search and couldn't find what I was looking for, and I went to fordfuelinjection.com and couldn't find what I was looking for.

What I'm looking for is what to do about coverting to MAF with a 302 and a e40d. I found information about using mustang parts for the 302, to switch it, except it doesn't work with the e40d. I found info on how to switch from a lightning with the 351 and e40d.

Does anyone know how to switch from sd to MAF with a 302 and e40d?
 
  #2  
Old 03-11-2010, 09:15 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 963 Likes on 762 Posts
It's the same as doing so with a 5.8 you just have to find a 5.0 MAF computer for the E4OD.
 
  #3  
Old 03-11-2010, 09:24 AM
special_k's Avatar
special_k
special_k is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So basically, all I need are the parts from a PU or BRONCO that has a 302 and the e40d.
Thanks for the fast timely response.
 
  #4  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:01 PM
greystreak92's Avatar
greystreak92
greystreak92 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gateway to the West
Posts: 9,179
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Yep, the only electrical/harness difference there would be that the the 302 has a knock sensor.
 
  #5  
Old 03-12-2010, 04:45 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
actually have heard that the maf f150 harness is different then the bronco maf harness due to the 4WABS and such.
 
  #6  
Old 03-12-2010, 09:44 PM
greystreak92's Avatar
greystreak92
greystreak92 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gateway to the West
Posts: 9,179
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Kem,

Did the F-150 get 4WABS before the Bronco did? I mean that would be a little odd considering the nearly identical equipment for so many years. And even so, if the Bronco lagged by a few years the wiring for the 4WABS should end up superfluous if the truck the harness goes into doesn't have it. Not doubting you, just curious as to how that could affect things. Did the 4WABS computer get info from equipment other than the ABS sensors?
 
  #7  
Old 03-12-2010, 09:49 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 963 Likes on 762 Posts
87-96 pickups never did get 4wABS.
 
  #8  
Old 03-15-2010, 11:36 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
a guy on fsb.com tried using the same year f150 maf harness as his current bronco and ran into issues. he found that he had to use a bronco maf setup complete for it to work.
 
  #9  
Old 03-15-2010, 06:05 PM
greystreak92's Avatar
greystreak92
greystreak92 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gateway to the West
Posts: 9,179
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Kemicalburns
a guy on fsb.com tried using the same year f150 maf harness as his current bronco and ran into issues. he found that he had to use a bronco maf setup complete for it to work.
How odd. Wasn't aware of any electrical harness differences between the Bronco and F-150's other than tailgate and dual fuel tank wiring of which the former is simply not used and the latter uses a jumper to tie two into one.

Oh and the fact that the F-series got the nifty factory break in the taillight harness to install a trailer connector where the Bronco didn't.
 
  #10  
Old 03-15-2010, 07:21 PM
Canadianice's Avatar
Canadianice
Canadianice is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I have been doing a lot of research on converting my 92 bronco 351 e40d to mass air and it looks like for my truck which does not have 4wABS a 302 mass air computer w/e40d is the ticket. Only problems I can see is that it looks like the pin locations on the computer for the mass air 302 system go to different wires for the e40d vs. my speed density computer according to my chiltons manual. so basically I would convert your truck from 4wABS to the old style 2wABS and it might expand your options. Then again that might be more work than being able to find a 5.0 mass air bronco.
 
  #11  
Old 03-16-2010, 10:40 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
canadianice, in your case you still will need the entire engine harness and e4od/mass air computer. dont try to use your current sd harness. also are you sure you dont have 4wabs? if thats the case then you could use an f150 harness and computer from 93-95
 
  #12  
Old 03-16-2010, 11:53 AM
monkei's Avatar
monkei
monkei is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: pleasanton, sfbay
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I have been doing a lot of research on converting my 92 bronco 351 e40d to mass air and it looks like for my truck which does not have 4wABS a 302 mass air computer w/e40d is the ticket.
Also, unless you have the ability to tune the EEC, I wouldn't advise using a 302 computer to run a 351w.

I grabbed everything (harness computer dist tfi) from a 94 CA MAF 5.0/e40d bronco to convert my 92 5.0/e40d Bronco and couldn't get it to shift correctly because of differences in wire routing to the trans between those years. Part of it may have been because I didn't have the 4wabs module hooked up to the 94 harness when I put it in my 92. The MAF conversion part went OK, though.

My plan now is to convert to a 351 and go MAF using a 95 CA bronco 351/e40d EEC with a modified 1995 f250 (2wd) harness. There are some special considerations when going this route: the EGR setup is different (95-DPFE, 92-Sonic EGR), I have to bypass the 4WABS module to get the speed signal to the PSOM, and I must add another 02 sensor. The engine wiring end of things should be fine.

If you have the $$$ you can use the mustang EEC and a standalone e40d trans controller like the Baumannator. If you go this way, there is a lot more tuning support for Mustang EECs compared to truck EECs.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Squaretrucks
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
07-29-2016 09:12 AM
Glaser67
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
01-31-2016 12:44 PM
southernboy0122
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
12-24-2010 08:57 PM
ranger6202
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
09-01-2008 10:54 PM
Karic
Modular V10 (6.8l)
7
04-27-2003 12:41 PM



Quick Reply: MAF Conversion clarification



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.