Notices
Modular V10 (6.8l)  

V10 project assistance....?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #1  
EvilScientist's Avatar
EvilScientist
Thread Starter
|
New User
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
V10 project assistance....?

Hello....
I'm contemplating doing a 2005-up, 6.8 3V V10 swap into a car (not a Mustang, and yes, I'm aware of how large this engine is) of all things, and I'd like to pick your collective brains about how feasible this idea might be. I've been doing some research over the last couple of months, and concerning the engine itself, there's almost nothing out there, short of 'pointless' and 'broken cranks', yet nobody seems to have actually known anyone with any of these problems.

Here are the parameters of how I'm going to set this car up:
1. Tremec TKO 5-speed
2. aftermarket EFI system
3. long-tube headers (custom built, obviously)
4. Possible upgrade to reground/custom cams later on
5. I'm going to lose the DBW throttle body

So far as the rest of the engine goes, with around 360 HP and north of 450 lbs/ft of torque....(before tuning, headers, and possibly cams) I really don't need to do too much else to the engine, and is precisely why I want to use one.

So far as practicality is concerned....this car will never be a daily driver, but the whole thought behind this concept was smooth power delivery, while also being frightening to drive, lol.

...which leads me to the following questions:
1. How well suited is this engine to N/A, lighter-car shenanigans, such as driving the bejesus out of it on a drag strip, or simply operating the engine where the rpm goes up and down constantly? Obviously it's a torque monster, and therefore I won't need to rev it to 10,000 rpm, but I'm curious as to whether or not I need to even think about using this engine.....

2. Connecting rods? Crankshaft? What is the real weak link to this engine?

3. If rods are the problem (as in the 5.4 Lightning), are these engines simply a 5.4 with two extra cylinders in the middle, therefore needing only to use 5.4 aftermarket components to strengthen the bottom end?

4. Has anyone ever discussed, or actually made a set of cams for this engine? I think that it might be possible to move the powerband up just a bit, and make it more suitable for mid-range and top end use, provided the rotating assembly can handle it....

Any thoughts? Cost isn't really a concern, yet I'll be doing the fab work myself.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #2  
TeamMudd's Avatar
TeamMudd
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 8
From: central Louisiana
here's a good site for performance V10 items.

Ford 4.6L 5.4L 6.8L Modular Performance Parts
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #3  
EvilScientist's Avatar
EvilScientist
Thread Starter
|
New User
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Well, that most certainly takes care of connecting rods and pistons, should I need to replace those....I thought that the 5.4/6.8 rods and pistons were the same, and this proves it.

Anything else out there? Or am I proceeding into rather uncharted territory here?
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #4  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
You are definitely in uncharted territory, to a degree, but GO FOR IT.

There was an Aussie here with a plan to put one into a car, but haven't heard from him in a while.

The one thing to look at is the variable-plenum intake, but if you just wire the flapper open (or remove it) or some other work that you obviously are capable of, it'll be fine in a light-weight (compared to a truck) vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #5  
EvilScientist's Avatar
EvilScientist
Thread Starter
|
New User
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Krewat
The one thing to look at is the variable-plenum intake, but if you just wire the flapper open (or remove it) or some other work that you obviously are capable of, it'll be fine in a light-weight (compared to a truck) vehicle.
Elaborate!

Is this 'variable-plenum' setup similar to what's equipped on a Mustang Cobra 4.6 engine, from 1999-2001, or the IMRC plates from the 4.6 DOHC B heads?

I'm thinking that I could retain the variable-plenum setup with an RPM-or-throttle-position switch (similar to a nitrous full-throttle switch) activated motor/switch, to open up the short-side of the intake at around 3000-3500 rpm or so....or only when going into 3/4-to-full throttle.

I'd like to get around 5500-6000 rpm out of it, just for giggles, but I don't know what the operating range of this engine is at, as I've only driven one V-10 equipped vehicle, and that was a '99 F350....some 5-6 years ago.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 05:11 PM
  #6  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Spinning 6k rpm should not be problem, my 2V has seen 5200 already.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 07:51 PM
  #7  
02mudbug's Avatar
02mudbug
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 164
Likes: 1
theres a fella here in the kansas city area that put a v10 in a grand marquis, merc probably 10 years ago, was lowered a little, had stang cobra brakes, heavy service p71 suspension parts, and i dont know what all done to the motor, I know its a little bigger car, but it moved " nahh, it cant be" but i looked underneath and sure enough, it was no 4.6 in that car.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #8  
MN_Viking's Avatar
MN_Viking
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
Here's from my research....

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/248160
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 07:26 AM
  #9  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by EvilScientist
Elaborate!

Is this 'variable-plenum' setup similar to what's equipped on a Mustang Cobra 4.6 engine, from 1999-2001, or the IMRC plates from the 4.6 DOHC B heads?

I'm thinking that I could retain the variable-plenum setup with an RPM-or-throttle-position switch (similar to a nitrous full-throttle switch) activated motor/switch, to open up the short-side of the intake at around 3000-3500 rpm or so....or only when going into 3/4-to-full throttle.

I'd like to get around 5500-6000 rpm out of it, just for giggles, but I don't know what the operating range of this engine is at, as I've only driven one V-10 equipped vehicle, and that was a '99 F350....some 5-6 years ago.
Anything over 5500rpms with the OE powdered metal rods and that long of a stroke is really pushing your luck.
JL
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 12:54 PM
  #10  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by EvilScientist
Elaborate!

Is this 'variable-plenum' setup similar to what's equipped on a Mustang Cobra 4.6 engine, from 1999-2001, or the IMRC plates from the 4.6 DOHC B heads?
I'm not really versed enough on all the other setups, but the "variable plenum" setup on the V10 is just that - a flapper basically shortens or lengthens the intake runners to help high- or low-end. It's not like the other setups that basically close one intake runner making the other runner flow faster (for low-end). I think if you have a light car, not a heavy truck, it'll be just fine setup for high-end. I could be wrong.

Someone on here who put a 3-valve motor into a 2-valve chassis setup some kind of vacuum dashpot to open/close the flapper based on load and/or RPM. After a pissing contest (by him and me, sadly) he hasn't been back.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #11  
EvilScientist's Avatar
EvilScientist
Thread Starter
|
New User
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Anything over 5500rpms with the OE powdered metal rods and that long of a stroke is really pushing your luck.
JL
Judging by the amount of 5.4-powered Lightnings I have seen with broken rods (it seems like at times it's one out of every two at times)....I am inclined to agree.

The other issue is going to be actually finding an intact 3-valve 6.8....

Anyone have the dry weight of this engine handy?
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2010 | 09:02 PM
  #12  
topscrt's Avatar
topscrt
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 258
Likes: 2
From: cleveland, ohio
you have to look at the wieght factor. It weight 670lb. if you going to replace the stock fuel rail for a custom on. you can go with a 4-port professional product fuel regulator. It's the only one with the right fuel pressure range (25-75lb). If you need any other answers email me.

nmmotorsports@hotmail.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #13  
EvilScientist's Avatar
EvilScientist
Thread Starter
|
New User
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by topscrt
you have to look at the wieght factor. It weight 670lb. if you going to replace the stock fuel rail for a custom on. you can go with a 4-port professional product fuel regulator. It's the only one with the right fuel pressure range (25-75lb). If you need any other answers email me.

nmmotorsports@hotmail.
Thank you, I will.

The only thing I'm paranoid about right now, is the crankshaft. I've been told FOAF (friend of a friend) horror stories about the cranks breaking in these engines, but no one as of yet can produce a direct witness to such a deed....I'm never going to supercharge one of these engines, but I wouldn't mind revving one a bit, as I've stated previously (6000 rpm, tops). I am already planning on upgrading rods and pistons whenever I get an engine to use, but to be honest, the crank issue, real or imagined, scares me.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #14  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by EvilScientist
Thank you, I will.

The only thing I'm paranoid about right now, is the crankshaft. I've been told FOAF (friend of a friend) horror stories about the cranks breaking in these engines, but no one as of yet can produce a direct witness to such a deed....I'm never going to supercharge one of these engines, but I wouldn't mind revving one a bit, as I've stated previously (6000 rpm, tops). I am already planning on upgrading rods and pistons whenever I get an engine to use, but to be honest, the crank issue, real or imagined, scares me.
The OEM cast cranks used in modulars are capable of FAR more HP and RPM than the old Windsor pushrod crap. The forged cranks that are used in some modular applications are even stronger. The deep-skirt block supplies serious support for the crankshaft,and I know of none that have broken that have not been broken due to other internal engine parts failing and taking out the crank in the process.
One example is a local shop that has a 4.6L with the OEM forged crank turning approx. 9000rpms and making in excess of 800rwhp N/A.
JL
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2010 | 11:47 PM
  #15  
MN_Viking's Avatar
MN_Viking
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
So with internal mods whats the way to go for rods and pistons?

How about valvetrain?

Can OEM Mustang parts fit with ease and are they better?

With having a 72 degree engine "V" is the vibration balancer a big deal when lightening up the internals and wanting to turn higher R's?


All these are questions I have in my head......just kind of let them spew out....
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE