Overheating? Should 220 worry me?
Fan Clutches: There are two different styles on the market; thermal and non-thermal. Thermal will engage tighter when the air being pulled through the radiator reaches a certain temperature; however, they will never engage 100% due to some hydraulic slippage. Non-thermal clutches remain in a halfway engaged position no matter what the temp. This is fine at an idle, but it does not pull much at higher RPM. As someone else said, bumping the RPM up to 1500-2000 for a minute or so will often cool-down an engine, but probably not as well, if any, with a non-thermal clutch or a flex-fan. You can easily tell the two clutches apart. A thermal style will have a coil attached to the front of it, similar to those large outdoor dial-style themometers. However, no clutch is going to pull more air than your direct-drive, fixed-pitch fan. The best you could do here would be to get a bigger fan. 16 inch seems small. Most pickup fans I have seen measure 18-19 inches.
Electric Fans: Not sure why, but I have always heard that these are more effective as a puller (between radiator & engine) rather than a pusher (between grill & radiator).
Radiators: Aluminum is more efficient than brass/copper. A 2-row aluminum can actually out-cool a 4-row brass/copper. This is because the aluminum tubes can be made out of thinner material(less insulating) and larger (more surface area) without balloning/bursting from pressure.
Here is a trick that some RVers (motorhomes) have done for travel in extreme climates. They hooked up a winshield washer pump to their fresh water tank to spray a fine mist in front of their radiator using several tiny jets. When the temperature gets too high, they just turn the pump on for a few seconds. Seems crude, but I would have to believe it is highly effective since water dissapates heat from metal many times better that air does.
Fan Shroud: Yes. Also required for safety sake. Touch the back of a spinning fan and it gives you a slap; touch the front and you will never touch it again (at least with the same hand).
The high-perf stat with the bigger hole is interesting, but that might afect the system much like when I had no thermostat and the engine temp went through the roof compared to either a 180 or 195. Imay try a 160, though, when I install the shroud. I'm not sure whether either type of clutch fan would improve the low-rpm cooling where the real problem is.
I also have a 302 in a '78 window van that has never had a cooling problem, even in 3-hour summer traffic jams with the air on. This is my first such problem with any Ford.
The RV "spray" trick is clever, and should work well. Since this truck also carries a 275-gallon fresh water tank, I may rig up something just for emergencies until this gets sorted out permanently. I have high hopes that the shroud may make a real difference shortly.
It now occurs to me that I should take a very careful look at the fan belt, also. It's not likely that it's the problem, or that five or six of us missed something that basic, but stranger things have happened. I'm going to try the water wetter, also. My order of attack then should be: fan shroud, and then a larger, or alternate type, of fan. The description of the theory behind shroud and fan design was a real education and I'm going to stick to that design as closely as possible. Many thanks for the excellent insights & ideas.
Gid
We'll probably have to do some significant modification, since the fan opening does appear to be much more off-center than fan, so we probably can't install it before Saturday or Sunday. Aside from the modifications, it looks pretty easy -- just removing the fan and maybe one or both of the radiator hoses, and then reinstalling the fan while the shroud is pushed back around the water pump. Probably one of those 20-minute jobs that stretch to four hours because of fitting, re-fitting, headscratching and trying to invent adapters and spacers out of beer cans and duct tape.
I'll report back about the water wetter tomorrow evening. According to the directions, it can be used with antifreeze, though the more dilute the mix, the better it works. The two people I've found who used it with 50/50 got an 8-10 degree reduction.
Gid
Though I'd mention that the fans a suppose to enter the shroud only about 3/4 to one inch or so, or visa versa. I once had a problem in that I had a Holley "clean air" 600 on a 390Gt Ranchero running in the Central Valley in Ca. with temps are over 100 alot, It didn't like the carb, changed to a 750 vaccum along with a overflow tank ended the 230 temps forever after. Is it the same carb as was on the 351m? When they set the timing, you use to have to pull and plug the vaccum line to get it set right....
Jim
My theory is that I should leave the fan cutout alone and simply adjust the shroud to sit in that spot with brackets, even though the shroud-to-radiator fit is off about an inch and a half or more. It hangs past the edge of the radiator on one side (and therefore must be blocked to force air thru the cores) and falls that much short on the other side. The hose cutouts are way off & will have to be patched & re-cut, too. Just in case any of you have the misfortune to tackle one like this, you probably need, like me, to make allowances for the edge of the radiator that the shroud flange blocks on the engine side. To keep out crud and insects that would eventually block the fins, I'll try to fit a fine-mesh screen over that strip. The only two other difficulty I can see is that two of the brackets probably should not actually contact the radiator fins (as they would since the 4-core is just as thick as the tanks) and the thin space they'll have to be offset will need to be filled with weatherstrip or something to make the air flow correct. I'll actually try to add something to the flange there so that air is pulled through every square inch of fins, but I doubt that'll work. However, if I have to settle for 90% flow thru a four-core and a shroud, that should be enough.
30 years ago, when I was young & foolish, I spent the summer stuffing a 413 wedge with long rams into a little Plymouth, and now I remember why I never did anything that radical again.
Gid
Most people tend to over analyze the cooling system, and forget the simple physics involved.
A: If the engine runs hot at idle and very slow speeds, But runs at normal temp at highway speeds. The problem is airflow through the raidiator.
B: If it runs normal at idle or slow speeds, but runs hot at higher speeds. The problem is water flow. (And yes! to much is just as bad as not enough! i.e. no thermostat)
Using these simple, but absolute, rules, your problem is ...airflow through the raidiator (actualy a lack of airflow) So you need one or more of the following. Larger fan, more fan blades, ducting to control airflow (shroud) or move the fan closer to the radiator.
If it was me, I would put on a 7 or 8 blade fan (off of a Lincoln or Camper special or?) No fan clutch (unless you do a lot of highway driving and gas milage is a consideration)(A GOOD flex fan is an acceptable compromise, not a cheap one). And most importantly, a fan shroud! For this, you can take your truck to a heating/air conditioning sheat metal shop and they will take mesurments and make you an amazingly nice shroud! I had one made and it cost me $75.00. The best investment I ever made.
As a note to everyone else, If both A & B apply. (it runs hot at idle slow or crusing speeds) There is a malfunction in the system such as bad thermostat, bad fan clutch, blocked water passages, pluged radiator retarded timing etc.
Also, now we know where "too hot" is -- today it hit 240 at one long idle (15 min. in only 70-degree weather), and at that point it began to stagger when he got back in and hit the gas pedal.
-- Gid
The only other thing that I've run into that did this was a cracked head. I'm not sure if anybody's mention this, but just to get it out on the table for thought. They can do a pressure check on the cooling system thats like a leak down test to see how it's holding pressure, and with the temps you've been seeing a radiator shop should be able to add some ideas. Hope I'm not just repeating things here.
Jim
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Jim, the leak-down test is a good idea & we'll do one later this week. It uses no coolant at all, though, so I don't expect to see a leak.
Will report back after we try this out.
Gid
Gid





