1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  

4.10's to 3.73's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-03-2009, 12:36 PM
bleeds blue's Avatar
bleeds blue
bleeds blue is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Utah
Posts: 553
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
4.10's to 3.73's

I have 4.10 and have 35" tires. The truck has all the power in the world but anything over 70 she putters out a little bit. I get 17mpg at 70. When I go faster the gas mileage falls through the floor. Should I switch to 3.73's?
 
  #2  
Old 09-03-2009, 01:55 PM
gt8684's Avatar
gt8684
gt8684 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Folsom, Louisiana
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats a good question i cant answer... but if you do change out to lower gears, i might be interested in buying your old 4.10s... i only have 3.55s...
 
  #3  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:54 PM
Brown Falcon's Avatar
Brown Falcon
Brown Falcon is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thomasville, GA
Posts: 11,231
Received 123 Likes on 83 Posts
3.73's are a great gear IMO. I went from 4.10's to 3.55's and I want to get 3.73's now. I miss the get up and go of the 4.10's, but the 3.55's are great on the highway.

if you do a lot of highway but still want better acceleration I'd go 3.73's
 
  #4  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:56 PM
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
phillips91 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rogersville, TN
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bleeds blue
anything over 70 she putters out a little bit.
what exactly do you mean here? do you mean it putters out as in it has no power? if so, dropping to a 3.73 will only make the problem worse. with 35's you are probably already close to a 3.55. dropping to a 3.73 will put you somewhere in the 3.15 to 3.20 range. generally when people go with bigger tires they go with a lower gear ratio(numerically higher like a 4.30 or 4.56). bigger tires=more rotating mass/loss of gearing/have to run it harder to gain or maintain speed, etc. all that kills your gas mileage. going with a higher gear ratio will mean youll just have to run it that much harder and will lose that much more mpg's.
 
  #5  
Old 09-03-2009, 05:11 PM
bleeds blue's Avatar
bleeds blue
bleeds blue is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Utah
Posts: 553
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
I mean the rpm's are getting a little high at the top end on the freeway. It has plenty of get up and go. I just want to bring the rpm's so the mileage will improve at 75mph
 
  #6  
Old 09-03-2009, 06:21 PM
wmiller's Avatar
wmiller
wmiller is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North East, MD
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doubt your gonna do much better fuel milage wise. Your end up pushing so much air when you get up 70+. I would keep the 4.10 other wise your gonna loose alot of low end. My truck had terriable acceleration with 3.55 towing in stock form.
 
  #7  
Old 09-03-2009, 06:35 PM
95_Dually's Avatar
95_Dually
95_Dually is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vacaville, Ca
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a buddy of mine that has 33's or 35's and 3.55 gears. He is getting 21 on the highway and 17 in town. It makes me jealous, LOL.



 
  #8  
Old 09-03-2009, 07:56 PM
Brown Falcon's Avatar
Brown Falcon
Brown Falcon is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thomasville, GA
Posts: 11,231
Received 123 Likes on 83 Posts
I wish I would have kept the 4.10's in mine... And I only have 33's. With your 35's I think you'll be happier with 4.10's
 
  #9  
Old 09-03-2009, 08:51 PM
Neal 97 250's Avatar
Neal 97 250
Neal 97 250 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN.
Posts: 9,010
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I turn 2500 at 70 and 2700-2800 at 75. I still have plenty of speed. I would be glad to race someone with a 65 mph kick. That is when it comes alive. Different mods, I know.
But still, if you want more speed it probably isn't the tires but maybe the mods. What mods do you have? Again I agree if you went 3.73 or 3.55 you would be sorry.
If you want 3.73 I have an open style carrier in my garage. I will ask the owner if he wants to sell if you want. Let me know.
 
  #10  
Old 09-04-2009, 12:36 AM
Riffraff Diesel's Avatar
Riffraff Diesel
Riffraff Diesel is online now
PREMIUM SPONSOR
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,027
Received 47 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by 95_Dually
I have a buddy of mine that has 33's or 35's and 3.55 gears. He is getting 21 on the highway and 17 in town. It makes me jealous, LOL.




Is that pic from the Oregon dunes? Looks really familiar, LOL.
 
  #11  
Old 09-04-2009, 12:44 AM
95_Dually's Avatar
95_Dually
95_Dually is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vacaville, Ca
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Riffraff Performance
Is that pic from the Oregon dunes? Looks really familiar, LOL.
It sure is. Good guess. We go up there every year for Presidents weekend. Great times.
 
  #12  
Old 09-04-2009, 12:55 AM
pjwoolw's Avatar
pjwoolw
pjwoolw is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Ramon Ca.
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The dunes near Florence?
 
  #13  
Old 09-04-2009, 08:00 AM
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
phillips91 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rogersville, TN
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bleeds blue
I mean the rpm's are getting a little high at the top end on the freeway. It has plenty of get up and go. I just want to bring the rpm's so the mileage will improve at 75mph

X2 what wmiller said. i saw a study a year or two ago where they said you lose something like 2 mpg for every 5 mph you do above 55 mph. the lower the rpm's you turn, the harder you have to work to push the wind. the higher the rpms you turn the more fuel you burn. they also did wind tunnel testing and showed that the faster you go the more the wind behind you acts like a vacuum as well. so not only do you have to break the wind(no pun intended) in front of you, but you have to accelerate harder to escape the wind thats pulling you back.
 
  #14  
Old 09-04-2009, 08:09 AM
Talyn's Avatar
Talyn
Talyn is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ashland City, TN
Posts: 17,708
Received 42 Likes on 38 Posts
Trucks create a different vacuum then cars do, if you have an open bed I mean.
The null space is created more in the bed of the truck, instead of behind it. So your transporting a vacuum.

33's here, with 4.10's. 2600 at 70. I'd love to have just a second over drive.
So, i'ma go with cody on that thought and throw in an overdrive kit.
 
  #15  
Old 09-04-2009, 08:30 AM
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
phillips91 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rogersville, TN
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Talyn
The null space is created more in the bed of the truck, instead of behind it. So your transporting a vacuum.

i cant speak about the wind tunnel testing, but i did my own mpg tests and they were pretty much dead on with what the study showed. i lost exactly 4 mpg going from 55 to 65.

you bring up an interesting thing about transporting a vacuum though....going back to my physics classes we were taught that things are weightless in a vacuum. so in theory, if we drive with our tailgates down, we should have infinite payload capacity
 


Quick Reply: 4.10's to 3.73's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.