Notices
General Diesel Discussion  

Convert to Diesel???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
cabochris's Avatar
cabochris
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Convert to Diesel???

This is my first post here. I just purchased a 1988 Econoline 250 Van. It also happens to be a fully self contained camping conversion van by Okanagan. Other than being in clean working condition, I know little about it since it is still new to me. I has an auto transmission, I believe 354 rear end and a 351 motor at around 10mpg. I believe this year Econoline also came with 6.9 and 7.3 diesels. Can I convert mine to a diesel? I was told I could put in a 460 gas, so how about a diesel? And if reasonable to do so, which diesel and what sort of fuel economy might one expect? This post is my starting point. The 351 motor runs good, but I feel it is somewhat underpowered and requires that I put more foot into it. I feel a 460 would up the power and perhaps still get 10mpg because I could ease back on the gas? But I'm really not power hungry and would prefer a diesel if it improved mpg. If the diesel got 12 to 14mpg, I would be happy with that. Thanks for any thoughts and advice.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 01:22 PM
  #2  
Ravenwood Ranch's Avatar
Ravenwood Ranch
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 1
From: Hanford, CA
hmm, i would just keep the gas motor, converting to diesel is alot more work than you realize, we just did a cummings into ford converstion at my freinds house, the truck was an 84 with the reg gas engine, not fun to wire it up.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #3  
cabochris's Avatar
cabochris
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Did the Cummings require more work than a Ford diesel would have? Now that all the work is is done, I bet you guys are happy with the transplant?
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 8
From: Lubbock
The cummins (5.9) would be difficult to fit I would think. Now a 4bt might work. If it were me and I was dead set I'd use a late 90's 7.3 either turbo diesel or the 7.3 powerstroke. Mpg should be better and so will power.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #5  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,491
Likes: 2,806
Club FTE Gold Member
Given the prices of vans, shop around for one with an oilburner already.

You could find a nice one with the equipment you want--a long shot as I realize you have the cramper unit, and then you sell yours and drive the new one. Or, you find one that's a bit trashed but still has sound running gear and make a swap.

Don't expect this to be easy, cheap or provide miracles. A 7.3 motor is still thirsty, even with diesel power.

4BT? Paint shaker.

Do some math. That 351 starts to look pretty good.

Check the SB forums. You may be able to improve the 351 enough to make it more livable. Conanski has the line on that.

Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #6  
kenpobuck's Avatar
kenpobuck
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,789
Likes: 5
From: Sand GAp, KY
It can be done. I put a 6.9 in my 88 Bronco, it was a lot of work but I feel it was worth it in the end. I was gettting about 14 mpg with the 302 that was in it and now I get about 17 mpg and that should go up after I turbo it and put in a zf5 speed. I bought an entire 86 4x4 truck and swapped out every thing including the axles. The gasser suspension will not hold the wieght of the diesel and the rear end will not take the torque. If you find a van the same year to use for a donor it is alot less painfull. Besides these old IDI's are easy to work on and a lot less expensive compared to a stroke, and if you do a few mods like a turbo and free flow exhaust they have great power potential! You can go down to the 6.9-7.3 pre powerstroke forum and ask about the IDI motors.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #7  
Kenworth's Avatar
Kenworth
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 2
It wouldn't be worth it do save very little money in fuel mileage.

Lets see you would need lots of pain killers for the headaches and the aches and pains your going to get.

You would need to change

Rad support and new Rad
Frame mounts for engine
Add wiring for glow plugs
New Transmission
Fuel tank and fuel lines
Upgrade the coil springs

The list goes on and on.

So buy the time you spend the 10 grand are you saving any money "NO"

You still have to find a good used 7.3 IDI. Good luck on finding a diesel Rad support for that year van.

In my mind your not going to save money so just live with the gas pot.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #8  
Volvo92906's Avatar
Volvo92906
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 1
From: Toledo, Ohio
Its worth it if you have a truck you want to keep for years and years and the truck is in good condition as it is. The headaches arent so bad because some places actually have a schematic on what you need to wire to what to hook it up but the suspension, transmission, mounts, brake system, and fuel system can be a pain to deal with and expensive. Im considering it all because I get 9mpg with a gasser but the rest of the truck is in great shape for another 20 years. An old 5.9 is mechanical and will boost me to 17 or 18mpg.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 12:48 AM
  #9  
Kenworth's Avatar
Kenworth
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 2
You would never beable to squeeze a Cummins B 5.9 in a E series way too long.

If you seen how shoe horned a 7.3 IDI is in a E series you wouldn't want to tempt it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
kenpobuck's Avatar
kenpobuck
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,789
Likes: 5
From: Sand GAp, KY
O.k., I didn't spend near 10 grand on my diesel conversion, more like about 3 grand and that was including freshening up the 6.9 when i did it. As I said if you get a donor for the engine trans etc. (you can pick up some cheap rust buckets) it gives you all the parts you need including the wiring. I bought my donor for $1300 and that included a delivery fee of $150. So if a guy wants to keep a vehichle like I did with my Bronco but wants a diesel a swap is a practical idea. I did the entire conversion in my drive way by myself with simple tools and a good grasp of mechanics and real good (if I must say so myself lol) set of fabrication skills.
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #11  
Kenworth's Avatar
Kenworth
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 2
A Bronco is hell of alot easier to work on than a E series.

I helped with a PSD removal out of a E series you want to talk about frustrating. To get the engine out took alot of work you can't lift them out easily with a engine hoist.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2009 | 07:42 PM
  #12  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,491
Likes: 2,806
Club FTE Gold Member
And note the PSD's in E's are rated lower in hp than the PU motors. Not enough room for the manifolding/turbo/air intake etc methinks.......
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #13  
samthelion's Avatar
samthelion
Cross-Country
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 1
From: W Cen. FL
Talking engine swap

I have to go with Lubbockguy1979 on this one. I, too, am looking at the
4BT for a swap. They are great because you can get the trans adaper and use your trans or an Allison, if you have an auto.
Down side is, you will probably have to change the rear gear, even with overdrive.
If you decide on the 460, raise the compression. 11.5 : 1 and you can still use pump gas.
Good luck and keep us posted.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #14  
6x4Cowboy's Avatar
6x4Cowboy
New User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: On a ranch
Originally Posted by samthelion
If you decide on the 460, raise the compression. 11.5 : 1 and you can still use pump gas.
I had a 1976 E350 Club Wagon with 460. You run that compression past 10 you better plan on running high test gas from the pump, you run it past 11 you better have a friend at the airport. That monster will pre-ignite (knock and ping) like you have an blacksmith under the hood. I ran 10:1 with an RV cam by Crane, and a Carter 625 CFM carb. I ran premium in it and it was an awesome van, on anything less octane it pinged bad. And before anyone chimes in, the timing was perfect. Well that is my 2 cents.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #15  
stormyrider's Avatar
stormyrider
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: northern Michigan
For starters you would have to beef up that front suspension as the diesel engine weighs a lot more then your gas engine. I would guess your radiator would need to be enlarged and add an extra cooling heat exchanger for your transmission. The 6.9 would be your best bet but it was rough on the C6. Plan on adding a shift kit to the C6 to make it hold up to the diesels torgue better. 6.9 should get you better mileage then the 351, nice thing about a diesel is it only uses the amount of fuel to get the work done. You'll also need to fiqure out where to put the addional battery tray as a diesel requires two batteries for starting.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE