Notices

429 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #1  
Truxx1956's Avatar
Truxx1956
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 9
From: I live in Leitchfield, KY
Question 429 question

Hey guys, I'm new on this board, but this looks like the right place for this question. I just bought a '71 model 429 from a Mercury Station Wagon. It has DOVE C heads on it and 94,000 miles on the engine. My question is, since it has a 2barrel carb on it, does that make any difference in the heads and cam? Also, what within a "cheap" price range is some good things to do to it for added performance? I'm thinkin about for at least now leaving the 2bbl on it and putting all new gaskets in it. I pulled the valve covers and you could eat out of them. I'm plannin on using it in a '56 panel truck. I'd like to see around 10 mpgs or so out of it? I couldnt get to the tag on the rear axle to see what gear ratio it had to get it close to a decent RPM at HWY speeds. It has C6 behind it and it ran great. Any ideas on what this beast put out stock? HP/Torque specs also how much does this thing weigh?
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #2  
kettle-one's Avatar
kettle-one
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Gresham Oregon
Honestly, a Performer, 600 Holley, and headers would free things up with out tearing the motor apart and porting the heads and adding a cam. I don't know if the 71' had the retarded timing chain, but I would replace it anyway with a good true roller as the stocker is likely stretched.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #3  
mcdonaldm's Avatar
mcdonaldm
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 6
From: Edmonton, Alberta Canada
the heads between the 4bbl and 2bbl engines are the same. not sure on cam, but i would suspect they are the same also.

the 460 is a heavy beast. all loaded you are looking at around 750 - 800 lbs of cast iron. going to an aluminum 4bbl manifold will probably save around 75lbs give or take as those cast iron manifolds are heavy.

rgds
Mike
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #4  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 778
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Truxx1956
I couldnt get to the tag on the rear axle to see what gear ratio it had.
Welcome to FTE

Most full sized Ford/Merc station wagons from this time frame, have either a 2.75-1 or 3.00-1 rear axle ratio.

 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #5  
Truxx1956's Avatar
Truxx1956
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 9
From: I live in Leitchfield, KY
Talking Thanks guys

Hey thanks guys. I'm probably goin to leave it "stock" with a fresh tune up on the carb and dist. I'll probably run 3:08's in the rear and hope for the best on MPG's??
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
huntinfool87
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Feb 22, 2017 09:50 PM
Barrett Mills
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
Feb 15, 2017 12:21 PM
dipstick429
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
May 15, 2015 08:18 PM
650
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Dec 29, 2011 11:07 AM
mgoovaerts
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
Feb 14, 2004 01:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.