1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ford why do you govern your stupid trucks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #76  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:59 PM
enduro4231's Avatar
enduro4231
enduro4231 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jaybread
All European cars are limited to 155mph per agreement with the EU. (this is for cars that can reach those speeds)

Tire speed ratings drive the limiters, besides political issues.

For example, the Japanese motorcycle companies all agreed to govern their high performance bikes to less than 200mph. This was in response to the media going crazy over "killer" sportbikes that could go over 200mph!! Now, they are limited to around 189, kill just as many people, but since they don't go over 200 the media has lost most of it's interest.

The only American car from a major company I know of with no limiter is the Corvette, but maybe the Viper also.

I agree with many other posts, if you are hitting the limiter in a Super Duty then you should re-think your driving habits. Not a good plan for survival.
2004 Mustang Cobra R as well.
 
  #77  
Old 05-19-2009, 08:25 PM
nitrogen's Avatar
nitrogen
nitrogen is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Carstairs Alberta
Posts: 2,191
Received 113 Likes on 67 Posts
well yeah there were plenty of cars that would pull 120 mph or better but with the exceptions of special editions how many of them were nearly flying by the time they hit 120. i've heard enough stories about dodges around 120/130 where the front tires were taking turns touching the ground. any of the 180 cars if you pulled it anywheres but a straight line your name better be Petty or Gurney. as far as tires overheating from speed several factors need to be considered, how much weight, ambient temperature and how long you intend to run at speed. ford has to consider worst case scenario, you're fully loaded with a fifth wheeler behind on a hot day in texas and you just might be crazy enough to try to cruise at 100 mph if they let you. now when you look at where saleen guy lives and what he is doing, ambient temps very rarely hit 100f, he had 500 lbs with a low center of gravity and all he wanted was a short burst of speed nowheres near longenough to cause the tires to actually overheat
 
  #78  
Old 05-20-2009, 12:54 PM
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
phillips91 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rogersville, TN
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
....Yes your right the 60s & 70s cars were alot of fun . I had a bunch of them & love em all.. Mopars . chevys . fords ..There wasn't to many boss 429s runing around but a few. More 428 cjs . But they all ran good mostley 14 sec cars stock but with some work ran alot better . I don't think a stock boss 429 will shave off 3 sec in the 1/4 mile with tires & timing . The tires to day are much better but back then we had what we had . So everything was pretty much the same traction wise. I ran a big block nova 396 that would hook with L 60 15s.. This is back in 73 though . Lew

youd be surprised what a set of tires will do for a car. just for comparisons sake i took my 86 mustang to the track with 225/60 street tires on it and i was in 4th gear before i hooked up. hadnt even made it to the 1/8 mile mark yet either. i was a good 5 or 6 seconds slower than with my drag radials. and those tires were wider than what the boss 9 came with stock. ive got a set of stock size goodyear polyglass tires on my 69 ltd and they look like bicycle tires compared to what comes on todays sports cars lol. those stock 60's tires didnt hold up too good on the skid pad tests either. skinny tires break free faster than the big meat the current gt 500 has. 14 and 15 inch rims and tires with huge sidewalls break free much faster than 18 inch rims and 2 inch sidewalls.
 
  #79  
Old 05-20-2009, 01:23 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by phillips91
youd be surprised what a set of tires will do for a car. just for comparisons sake i took my 86 mustang to the track with 225/60 street tires on it and i was in 4th gear before i hooked up. hadnt even made it to the 1/8 mile mark yet either. i was a good 5 or 6 seconds slower than with my drag radials. and those tires were wider than what the boss 9 came with stock. ive got a set of stock size goodyear polyglass tires on my 69 ltd and they look like bicycle tires compared to what comes on todays sports cars lol. those stock 60's tires didnt hold up too good on the skid pad tests either. skinny tires break free faster than the big meat the current gt 500 has. 14 and 15 inch rims and tires with huge sidewalls break free much faster than 18 inch rims and 2 inch sidewalls.
.....Oh yeah , im a big fan of mickey thompson tires . I like there drag radials they hook good but don't last long on the street . Im running a set of sportsman now they don't get traction like the drag radials but there a lot of fun . I have a set of ET slicks we use at the track . I like the 15in wheel , more sidewall flex better traction . Lew
 
  #80  
Old 05-20-2009, 02:37 PM
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
phillips91 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rogersville, TN
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
I like the 15in wheel , more sidewall flex better traction . Lew
thats what i run on mine too. 15in wheel with 28.8 inch tall tires. thats kind of what im getting at though. the new cars may put out better skid pad numbers, but a lot of that number comes from the tires and not the car itself. too many people just look at the stock testing numbers from old vs new and dont take into account why the numbers are the way they are. take the current gt-500 that turns a .90 on the skid pad and put a set of 15 inch wheels with big sidewall tires on it and that number is going to drop down to the low .8 range. then give it 8" wide tires like the 60's cars had and its going to drop down into the .7's. doesnt sound that much better than the 60's cars turning .7's if you give them equally matched wheels/tires.
 
  #81  
Old 05-20-2009, 04:35 PM
fcatpnj's Avatar
fcatpnj
fcatpnj is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 F-350 Larit Crewcab Dually Diesel-decked out

My truck turns 2500 RPM at 70-75 (4.30 gears) which I am used to hearing diesels turn 2000-2250 in heavy equipment. So the 2500 seems to tight for my comfort for a long period, I don't want to think about what it would turn at 90-100!!!!!!!!
I have found the "sweet" spot for fuel mile to be around 2100 RPM, so unless I am in a big hurry I run some where around that (60+). Besides I like to drive slow so everybody gets a good look at my beautiful truck!
 
  #82  
Old 05-20-2009, 05:09 PM
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
bill11012 is offline
Modular motor junkie
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I got my 98 v10 truck up to 105!
 
  #83  
Old 05-20-2009, 05:44 PM
SuperDutyScaler's Avatar
SuperDutyScaler
SuperDutyScaler is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,381
Received 36 Likes on 33 Posts
well i had my truck (pic in my avaitor) when i first got my superchip up to 125mph thanks to my cousin. hes a cop and we used his rador one afternoon, dont tell. it was cool but it fing scared me to death so now the governor is back on at 105mph. but i rarely go over 90 any more.
 
  #84  
Old 05-20-2009, 06:03 PM
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
bill11012 is offline
Modular motor junkie
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperDutyScaler
well i had my truck (pic in my avaitor) when i first got my superchip up to 125mph thanks to my cousin. hes a cop and we used his rador one afternoon, dont tell. it was cool but it fing scared me to death so now the governor is back on at 105mph. but i rarely go over 90 any more.
WOW!! I have gone up to 135 in an old cop car but i can never imagine going 125 in a truck! how high were the revs with a 4.30 rear in it?
 
  #85  
Old 05-20-2009, 07:14 PM
bigdummyford's Avatar
bigdummyford
bigdummyford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Duluth
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok im stupid....

Well, maybe my DP Tuner pulls the plug on the speed limiter but i was traveling at about 115 ( the needle was somewhere between the 1 and 2 gear position indicator) last weekend trying to keep up with 95 Impala SS. Now my tires are probably only rated to 100 but the tires should be fine so long as I am not doing so for extended periods of time. anyways if theres a limiter on my F-350 then I'll never find it.
 
  #86  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:20 PM
fcatpnj's Avatar
fcatpnj
fcatpnj is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a 2002 F-250 4x4 crewcab with 5.4 gas and 3.73 gears, it would cruise at 90 all night long. Had it up to and a tick over 100mph a few times (did not look down much). never did bump the governor and it was stock as a box of rocks. Threw the years every Ford I have ever own would stroll once it got on top of their gear.
 
  #87  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:55 PM
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Kajtek1 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well not a Ford, but still diesel

 
  #88  
Old 05-21-2009, 02:05 AM
freekyFX4's Avatar
freekyFX4
freekyFX4 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine used to cut off at 90 MPH...then I got a tuner.
 
  #89  
Old 05-21-2009, 05:56 PM
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
bill11012 is offline
Modular motor junkie
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
nice grill guard were you get it?
 
  #90  
Old 05-22-2009, 12:44 AM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 32,165
Received 1,725 Likes on 1,408 Posts
Originally Posted by phillips91
well, for starters, the torino talledega and mercury cyclone came with 3.25 gears, not 3.90. both of which could easily hit 180 without a 5 mile run. if you want to compare handling of yesterdays cars to todays, dont use a 60's car made for drag racing, use one thats made for handling. the 68.5 428 mustang was a drag race special car that was meant to do nothing more than go in a straight line and had no suspension upgrades what so ever. it wasnt built for handling. check the boss 302 if you want to see how a 60's car thats made to handle can do. cars today, like the gt-500, are much better all around cars than the muscle cars from the 60's, but the cars back then were built with a purpose. the boss 302 was meant for trans am racing, so it wasnt that good at drag racing. the 68.5 428 mustang was meant for drag racing, so it didnt handle worth a crap. the talladega was meant for top speed in nascar, so it came with 3.25 gears instead of 4.30, etc.

i dont know if you know much about 60's cars, but back then drag racing, nascar, etc had to be showroom cars. which means they had to come from the factory de-tuned enough so that the average joe could drive them on the street, but easily tuned to compete in nascar and professional drag racing. motor trend or car and driver, i cant remember which, did some tests on the boss 429 a few years back and in stock form it ran a 14.0 in the 1/4 mile. that will barely run with a stock 5.0. they also mentioned that the stock tires were 8" and it spun the them all the way through 3rd gear. they did nothing but bump the timing and put a set of drag radials on it and it ran an 11.2. so did it run an 11.2 off the showroom floor? no. but all it took to get it there was a decent set of tires and bumping the timing.

ive owned mustangs/muscle cars from every generation from the 60's up through the 90's and id take the 60's models any day of the week. but like i said, you had to get one for its intended purpose.
------------------------
Well, since we are OT and beating this horse too...

I was around in the '60s and read the mags and went to the drags, so I'm not making all this up and I remember it pretty well. First of all, with 3.25s and 28 inch tires, 180 mph takes 7020 rpm. NONE of those cars would go anywhere close to 180 off the showroom floor. By the time the Talledega etc came around, NASCAR cars were pretty much stock sheet metal, but had rollcages that stiffend the chassis, were lowered, suspension modified or completely replaced and a host of other items on top of 'radio and heater delete'. Plus they had "Boss" 429s & maybe still some 427 solid lifter engines, not the (relative) wheezer 428.

I'm not sure what a Boss 302 pulled G wise, but it was probably more than that 428 model. With respect to that, note the Mustang, on new radials, pulled almost the same G as the Corvette on older designed tires. Since the Boss had 60 series tires that were about 2 inches wider than the 70s, it probably pulled something close to .70. Keep in mind the Corvette, which I believe would out corner even a Boss 302, only pulled a .69 on those old tires.

The Boss 429 is probably the best example of a detuned for street use engine. Part of the plan there was to sell enough to qualify it for NASCAR. 13.7s IIRC with slicks--of course, the greasy hard slicks of 1970, so 11.2 on newer tires would make sense.

Hey, not disagreeing with you here on everything, but nothing ran 180 out the showroom door. However, I think a Super Duty ought to be allowed to run 180 if the driver needs to go that fast. KmH or MPH, take your pick.
 


Quick Reply: Ford why do you govern your stupid trucks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.