automakers
Filing for that is the fault of Obama. Obama as you said told them that they HAVE TO MERGE or they wont get any money and they will haveto file. Point is Obama shouldnt be telling automakers how to do their job when hes incompetent himself. He blaims bush still because all the money he threw at the problem (that others have said was a stupid idea) has done nothing but made things worse.
Obama could have given them the money and let them use it how they wish to stay afloat and let them do their thing. I mean hell Obama is giving us money down here for our ****ing light rail which is basically a glorifed transit train/trolley we had back in the 1900`s and did away with cause of the deaths (so far multiple cars have been hit by this silent trolley).
Either way though I think more needs to be done to afloat the big three over keeping the banks afloat. After all Roosevelt created jobs and fixed the economy by not spending money like Obama is. He got people work platning trees and building stuff and their pay was warm food. Why cant obama use his head and think of a way to resolve things over spending more money putting us more in debt.
But heres what you said.
"Stick to demestics? GM is close to bankruptcy, Chrysler will be fortunate to make it to May 1st."
You are basically saying dont buy domestic cars buy imports by saying that. If we did as you saidit would drive a nail in and end the domestic cars for sure.
To be honest its very hard for me to find a new car that says Made in USA on any part of it.
I gladly pay the $10 - $20 more for restoration parts that says Made in USA on it cause they fit better than those cheaply made import models that never fit right or look right.
Hell I had one I got it was a wheel well trim cause I couldnt find any other repoduction. 2 month later it hazed up and got foggy like the 46 year old anodized aluminum on my 63 and this was kept out of the weather.
But there are some things you cant get that says Made in the USA on it. But thankfully lots of the older cars has reuseable parts that can be rebuilt so thats a plus.
Filing for that is the fault of Obama. Obama as you said told them that they HAVE TO MERGE or they wont get any money and they will haveto file. Point is Obama shouldnt be telling automakers how to do their job when hes incompetent himself. He blaims bush still because all the money he threw at the problem (that others have said was a stupid idea) has done nothing but made things worse.
Obama could have given them the money and let them use it how they wish to stay afloat and let them do their thing. I mean hell Obama is giving us money down here for our ****ing light rail which is basically a glorifed transit train/trolley we had back in the 1900`s and did away with cause of the deaths (so far multiple cars have been hit by this silent trolley).
Either way though I think more needs to be done to afloat the big three over keeping the banks afloat. After all Roosevelt created jobs and fixed the economy by not spending money like Obama is. He got people work platning trees and building stuff and their pay was warm food. Why cant obama use his head and think of a way to resolve things over spending more money putting us more in debt.
But heres what you said.
"Stick to demestics? GM is close to bankruptcy, Chrysler will be fortunate to make it to May 1st."
You are basically saying dont buy domestic cars buy imports by saying that. If we did as you saidit would drive a nail in and end the domestic cars for sure.
I was replying to the OP who wanted to know which automaker: Ford, GM, or Toyota, is in the best financial condition.
The answer is...sadly...Toyota.
You better read some history inre to FDR, who spent BILLIONS of US dollars putting America back to work.
Do you honestly believe that the CCC, WPA, and all the other New Deal programs FDR began didn't cost anything but warm food?
For example...who paid for Hoover Dam, and Boulder City built especially to house the workers to build it?
Who paid for the TVA? Who paid for the 1000's of buildings erected by the WPA?
Who paid for all the new highways? Who paid all the workers involved in all these programs (they didn't work for nothing)? Who paid for the warm food?
The US Gov't paid for all of it...and who is the US Gov't? The American taxpayer.
FDR also gave over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS of US made products as foreign aid to the Allies before and during WWII.
How many of those countries repaid their war debts?
ONE = Canada.
GM may go bankrupt, but GM is not going under. Chapter 11 is a re-organization of debts.
The bankruptcy court will try and find buyers for GM's moribund brands: Hummer, Saturn. SAAB, Opel.
GM has already stated that they have been trying to find buyers for these brands, and put SAAB into Swedish bankruptcy court months ago.
The German Gov't has refused to bail out Adam Opel AG, which GM has owned since 1931.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
The new cars are okay. I like the 2009 Mustang (think the 2010 Mustang looks ugly) I like the 2009 Challenger (like the manual transmission option one more) and as far as the camaro goes what kills it for me is the flat top round tail lights they look like half closed eyes. Got the chinese eye 59 chevys and now the half asleep 09 Camaro.
Nope dont really need anything for the car just need to do body repairs where some dumb idiot speeding down the street wasnt paying attention hit the back bumper of my truck in the driveway and drove the truck bumper into the back end of the car. Got a new tail light lens but need body work. Only thing I really need is a new dashpad and apaint job. Oh yea and to figure out why the engine starts up and dies when you release the key. If I hold it slightly towards Run the engine stays running. I dont know if its the starter relay or if its the ignition switch behind the dashboard.
Cant drive it
What it does is turn the key to start the engine starts and when you let go of the key back to Run the engine dies. If I hold the key slightly foward it stays running. I just dont want to pull that plastic dashboard apart with age. I got a starter relay I planned on putting on when I had time hopefully that fixes is.
My 63 did this and i resolved it by running my own wire from the solenoid up to the coil and it worked. So hopefully thats the problem with this
Cant drive it
What it does is turn the key to start the engine starts and when you let go of the key back to Run the engine dies. If I hold the key slightly foward it stays running. I just dont want to pull that plastic dashboard apart with age. I got a starter relay I planned on putting on when I had time hopefully that fixes is.
Whatever the problem is..it will not involve taking the dash apart.
And it's most likely not the ignition cylinder or the starter relay that's causing the problem.
But its on the 88 Escort GT I got.
I am just going to replace the starter relay and go from there. Thats the orignal one that came with the car.
But its on the 88 Escort GT I got.
I am just going to replace the starter relay and go from there. Thats the orignal one that came with the car.
The rod operates the ignition switch...which is easily accessible at the bottom of the steering column.
Directly below the ignition cylinder in the column's flange is a brass gear, flat bearing and snap ring.
The brass gear is what operates that rod. And...
....That brass gear is notorious for stripping. When that occurs, the rod will not properly engage the switch.
Which means...you have to hold the key in the START position so the engine will keep running.
IMO...it's the brass gear or the ignition switch itself...possibly both.
If the relay was defective, it would just go click click click.
The 1982 truck you have ...has the exact same setup the Escort does.







