Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

O2 Sensor Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #16  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
If you don't have a baro sensor then you MAF is at fault, is it all original or has it been replaced?
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 09:09 PM
  #17  
wantaford's Avatar
wantaford
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Davis County, UT
Originally Posted by Conanski
If you don't have a baro sensor then you MAF is at fault, is it all original or has it been replaced?
It is original. It was really dirty when I bought the truck, I cleaned it with MAF cleaner and it helped alot. Do you know which pin/wire to check on these? I could check the voltage on it at idle.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #18  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
See here... Ford Fuel Injection Mass Air Flow Sensor

I also just saw a note that from '94 and up Ford used the MAF sensor to calculate barometric pressure instead of measuring it directly.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #19  
wantaford's Avatar
wantaford
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Davis County, UT
Cool Webpage, lots of info there. Looks like Pin C is where to check.
Maybe this means it's time to upgrade the MAF to bigger (like 85mm), with bigger induction and bigger throttle body - and a EEC-V tuner.

Thanks Conanski
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #20  
wantaford's Avatar
wantaford
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Davis County, UT
Originally Posted by Conanski
OK here's the deal, 2 of your sensors are working exactly as they should.. switching rapidly from low to high voltage. I also think that your two main(front) sensors are bank 1 sensor 1 and bank 2 sensor 1. The one behind the cat should be bank 1 sensor 2 and I don't know if it's supposed to act differently or not, could be since it's function is different.
Do you know what the voltage should be reading on the O2 Sensors in KOEO?
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #21  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
There in info and testing details for all the sensors on the main page in that link...
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #22  
wantaford's Avatar
wantaford
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Davis County, UT
I think my MAF is bad, after days of playing and testing that is my un-professional opinion. It is reading almost 1/2 a volt higher in every airflow range. I was going to order a reman unit from Ford but I decided to call Pro-M to see what they had before ordering it from Ford. After talking to them I am more confused then ever. They asked me clean the old MAF in a way that I had not done before. Use a small pipe cleaner soaked in carb cleaner and scrub it until those metal sensor wires were bright silver - "but don't break them". My MAF was pretty clean already - but I cleaned it the way they suggested and nothing changed.

Pro-M said because of the K&N filter that is on the end of my MAF it has changed the dynamics of the voltage. They suggested I send them my K&N Filter with the adapter it has to mount to the MAF and they will send me a new MAF specifically calibrated to work with my K&N and mods I have done to the truck. Anyone have good or bad experiences with Pro-M Racing?
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 02:33 PM
  #23  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by wantaford
Pro-M said because of the K&N filter that is on the end of my MAF it has changed the dynamics of the voltage.
Oh... you have one of those damn things, that explains it then. ProM is dead on, the conical filter is messing up your MAF meter readings, it should NEVER be attached directly to the meter, it should be 6-12 inches away to allow the airflow to smooth out. As you are now aware the oil from these filters also contaminates the meter, and it sucks in hot underhood air instead of cooler outside air along with more dirt, so they really create more problems than they cure. Before spending money on a custom MAF meter simple reposition yours as I suggested above, and also try rotating the meter, sometimes just putting the sensor in a different part of the airstream changes the readings.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #24  
wantaford's Avatar
wantaford
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Davis County, UT
I don't think putting on a filter on the outside of an MAF would disrupt air flow that much. Pro-M them selves offer MAF's with filters attached to the outside. I do agree that it is sucking in exhaust manifold heat. I am building an aluminum shield for it right now. Here is a link of the FIPK that I have on my truck right now: 57-2516 - K&N 57 Series FIPK, Performance Intake Kit. Pro-M told me today that I would need to buy their 85mm MAF as they don't offer a 80mm flanged MAF. If I were to go with the 85mm MAF I would have to build an all new air tube induction system and I really don't want to do that, especially considering California smog I have to deal with. I did call a local dyno tuner and they recommended the Pro-M stuff, but they would want to reflash my ECM instead of chipping it with something like from SCT. Not sure what to do
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #25  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
One of the problems with open air filters under the hood is fan wash, I have seen testing results showing just how much this disrupts the sensor but can't find it at the moment, if memory serves me a 1/2 volt is well within possibility here. You should try rotating the meter from straight up and down and see if it makes any difference in the voltage measurements you get.

Is your truck OBD1 or OBD2? If it's OBD1 it can't be reflashed there is no programmable memory onboard, that's why all the 3rd party companies use a chip or module for this series.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:38 AM
  #26  
wantaford's Avatar
wantaford
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Davis County, UT
Originally Posted by Conanski

Is your truck OBD1 or OBD2? If it's OBD1 it can't be reflashed there is no programmable memory onboard, that's why all the 3rd party companies use a chip or module for this series.
It's OBD II, it has the EEC-V ECM. I think the heat shield will help tremendously. It will cut back on the fan swirl and keep the excess heat out. If SMOG was not such a big deal here I would build a custom cold-air intake for it with the bigger throttle body that BBK offers. But I don't think it is quite worth the funds. I think the best thing to do at this point is get a new MAF (Stock or Pro-M) and have it dyno tuned and calibrated/reflashed. It might be the best $400 I have ever spent.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #27  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Why don't you believe me that changing the distance from the filter or even the orienataion of the meter changes the meter readings? It's simple to test and won't cost you anything.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 09:44 AM
  #28  
wantaford's Avatar
wantaford
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
From: Davis County, UT
Originally Posted by Conanski
Why don't you believe me that changing the distance from the filter or even the orienataion of the meter changes the meter readings? It's simple to test and won't cost you anything.
I didn't ever say I wouldn't try it. I was going to try it.

With the K&N attached to the end of the MAF and being that it is a flanged MAF I can only tweak and rotate so much. Because of the brackets that attach to the flange to support and hold it in place.

However, with the other mods that have been added, the truck needs to be dyno/tuned anyways. I have always felt that the truck isn't utilizing the headers and exhaust that have been added.

I used to own a '92 F-250 that I had added the same mods too. Banks Power Pack, MSD, etc. That was a speed density setup and that truck was a screamer. It pulled heavy loads really well and had tremendous power. With this truck being a MAF truck, I always thought it would run better with the MAF which in many ways it does. But from the perspective of power I don't think the ECM is utilizing the exhaust as wells as the SD setup.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 06:01 AM
  #29  
jbracefan1977's Avatar
jbracefan1977
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by wantaford
I don't think putting on a filter on the outside of an MAF would disrupt air flow that much. Pro-M them selves offer MAF's with filters attached to the outside. I do agree that it is sucking in exhaust manifold heat. I am building an aluminum shield for it right now. Here is a link of the FIPK that I have on my truck right now: 57-2516 - K&N 57 Series FIPK, Performance Intake Kit. Pro-M told me today that I would need to buy their 85mm MAF as they don't offer a 80mm flanged MAF. If I were to go with the 85mm MAF I would have to build an all new air tube induction system and I really don't want to do that, especially considering California smog I have to deal with. I did call a local dyno tuner and they recommended the Pro-M stuff, but they would want to reflash my ECM instead of chipping it with something like from SCT. Not sure what to do
I have the same K&N also and love it, I could have found it a little cheaper on ebay, but I wanted a valid warranty so I got it at here. K&N 57-2516, or you can try one of the vendors on the forum here, you can usually find a good deal that way as well. This was very easy to install and I love it. good luck
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 09:35 PM
  #30  
Brad57's Avatar
Brad57
New User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
where is the baro sensor on a 95 F150 with a 5.0
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE