Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

little help needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 03:03 PM
  #1  
nintey4f150's Avatar
nintey4f150
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
From: south jersey
little help needed

hey guys.. i finally got thw swap done on my 94 f150... originally had a 302 but i had a 351 windsor put in....just picked it up from the exhaust shop and drove it around and it seems to crusie around ok but when i give it full throttle it seems to break up.. not sure if its a fuel issue or not cause it still is the 302 wiring harness... any help would be great
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 01:42 AM
  #2  
LCAM-01XA's Avatar
LCAM-01XA
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 1
What's the firing order of the 302, compared to the 351? I know for sure the 351 has the same firing order as the 302s in Mustang and Mark VIIs, but the truck 302 I think uses the same firing order as the fullsize cars and that one is different from the HO/351 firing order. The issue with all this is not just the spark plugs order on the dizzy cap, but with the injectors as well - the '94 302 is a SEFI system, meaning each injector fires just before the intake valve opens, as oposed to the batch-fire system where the injectors fire in groups of 4 at a time. I think the 351 always used batch-fire and never got a SEFI setup...
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 07:11 AM
  #3  
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 40
From: Concord, NC
The 94 302 should use the 351 firing order. I assume you still have the 302 computer? If it is not mass air then you need to find a 351 computer.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
nintey4f150's Avatar
nintey4f150
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
From: south jersey
yes it is they are the same firing order and yes it is a 302 computer with mass air
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #5  
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 40
From: Concord, NC
Try pulling codes from the computer and see what comes up.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #6  
nintey4f150's Avatar
nintey4f150
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
From: south jersey
pulled the codes an all igot was egr not opening
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #7  
LCAM-01XA's Avatar
LCAM-01XA
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 1
Is there a 351 ECM with mass air and SEFI? Cause if there ain't and the 351 ECM uses the batch-fire, you will end up with just two injectors firing, unless you swap in a batch-fire engine harness as well. I apologize if this is all a moot point, I do not know enough about the truck Windsor engines, but one of my friends has an '86 F150 with a 351 that he converted to SEFI using a mass-air SEFI harness and a matching 302 ECM (believe tis the A9L), then he Tweecer-ed it to work with the larger airflows associated with the 351 displacement.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #8  
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 40
From: Concord, NC
You are right about the 351 being batch injected, but since nintey4f150 is using the 302 SEFI computer and wiring, he won't experience that problem. If he were to install a batch injected 351 computer into the 302 wiring, then yes, it would be running on two cylinders.

Is there any way you can monitor fuel pressure while driving? If fuel pressure drops when the engine stumbles, you may have a weak pump. One thing you might try is to clean the MAF sensor heating elements. If they are dirty, the computer will interpret less mass air flow and will inject less fuel, leaving any adjustment up to O2 sensor feedback. The range of adjustment based on O2 sensor feedback may not be enough to prevent the stumble at higher loads and rpms.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 08:38 PM
  #9  
nintey4f150's Avatar
nintey4f150
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
From: south jersey
well i just drove to dairy queen and it was good for a little bit just crusing but then it started missing and running like crap... but i later drove it and it was ok and then the ssame thing happened
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #10  
LCAM-01XA's Avatar
LCAM-01XA
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by EPNCSU2006
You are right about the 351 being batch injected, but since nintey4f150 is using the 302 SEFI computer and wiring, he won't experience that problem. If he were to install a batch injected 351 computer into the 302 wiring, then yes, it would be running on two cylinders.
Oh, okay, I misread you then - I thought you suggested running a 351 computer, hence why I pointed out the whole batch-fire vs SEFI thing.
Is there any way you can monitor fuel pressure while driving? If fuel pressure drops when the engine stumbles, you may have a weak pump. One thing you might try is to clean the MAF sensor heating elements. If they are dirty, the computer will interpret less mass air flow and will inject less fuel, leaving any adjustment up to O2 sensor feedback. The range of adjustment based on O2 sensor feedback may not be enough to prevent the stumble at higher loads and rpms.
I'm thinking you're onto something with the MAF - the ECM is programmed from the factory to ignore O2 sensors at higher throttle positions, so it will rely entirely on the MAF and the MAP to tell it how much fuel to put in based on how much air is coming in and how much load the engine is experiencing. I'm thinking tho, every engine sensor has a margin of acceptable readings, if it reads out of that the ECM eventually learns to ignore it and switches over to an alternate means of running the engine. So now the MAF is reading higher flow numbers at any given engine speed (just cause tis a 351 engine, and not a 302), what if those flow numbers are out of the ECM's acceptable range? Again, I don't know how wide that acceptable readings band os fir this 302 ECM, but wouldn't that make sense?
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 04:48 AM
  #11  
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 40
From: Concord, NC
Oh, okay, I misread you then - I thought you suggested running a 351 computer, hence why I pointed out the whole batch-fire vs SEFI thing.
I see, sorry about that. I meant that if the 302 were not MAF, then a 351 computer was a good idea. Since it is MAF, it should be okay with the 302 computer.

So now the MAF is reading higher flow numbers at any given engine speed (just cause tis a 351 engine, and not a 302), what if those flow numbers are out of the ECM's acceptable range? Again, I don't know how wide that acceptable readings band os fir this 302 ECM, but wouldn't that make sense?
I see what you mean. I'm not sure if the computer has an acceptable range of mass flows for each RPM or if it just uses the full MAF sensor voltage range as acceptable regardless of RPM.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE