When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
hey guys.. i finally got thw swap done on my 94 f150... originally had a 302 but i had a 351 windsor put in....just picked it up from the exhaust shop and drove it around and it seems to crusie around ok but when i give it full throttle it seems to break up.. not sure if its a fuel issue or not cause it still is the 302 wiring harness... any help would be great
What's the firing order of the 302, compared to the 351? I know for sure the 351 has the same firing order as the 302s in Mustang and Mark VIIs, but the truck 302 I think uses the same firing order as the fullsize cars and that one is different from the HO/351 firing order. The issue with all this is not just the spark plugs order on the dizzy cap, but with the injectors as well - the '94 302 is a SEFI system, meaning each injector fires just before the intake valve opens, as oposed to the batch-fire system where the injectors fire in groups of 4 at a time. I think the 351 always used batch-fire and never got a SEFI setup...
Is there a 351 ECM with mass air and SEFI? Cause if there ain't and the 351 ECM uses the batch-fire, you will end up with just two injectors firing, unless you swap in a batch-fire engine harness as well. I apologize if this is all a moot point, I do not know enough about the truck Windsor engines, but one of my friends has an '86 F150 with a 351 that he converted to SEFI using a mass-air SEFI harness and a matching 302 ECM (believe tis the A9L), then he Tweecer-ed it to work with the larger airflows associated with the 351 displacement.
You are right about the 351 being batch injected, but since nintey4f150 is using the 302 SEFI computer and wiring, he won't experience that problem. If he were to install a batch injected 351 computer into the 302 wiring, then yes, it would be running on two cylinders.
Is there any way you can monitor fuel pressure while driving? If fuel pressure drops when the engine stumbles, you may have a weak pump. One thing you might try is to clean the MAF sensor heating elements. If they are dirty, the computer will interpret less mass air flow and will inject less fuel, leaving any adjustment up to O2 sensor feedback. The range of adjustment based on O2 sensor feedback may not be enough to prevent the stumble at higher loads and rpms.
well i just drove to dairy queen and it was good for a little bit just crusing but then it started missing and running like crap... but i later drove it and it was ok and then the ssame thing happened
You are right about the 351 being batch injected, but since nintey4f150 is using the 302 SEFI computer and wiring, he won't experience that problem. If he were to install a batch injected 351 computer into the 302 wiring, then yes, it would be running on two cylinders.
Oh, okay, I misread you then - I thought you suggested running a 351 computer, hence why I pointed out the whole batch-fire vs SEFI thing.
Is there any way you can monitor fuel pressure while driving? If fuel pressure drops when the engine stumbles, you may have a weak pump. One thing you might try is to clean the MAF sensor heating elements. If they are dirty, the computer will interpret less mass air flow and will inject less fuel, leaving any adjustment up to O2 sensor feedback. The range of adjustment based on O2 sensor feedback may not be enough to prevent the stumble at higher loads and rpms.
I'm thinking you're onto something with the MAF - the ECM is programmed from the factory to ignore O2 sensors at higher throttle positions, so it will rely entirely on the MAF and the MAP to tell it how much fuel to put in based on how much air is coming in and how much load the engine is experiencing. I'm thinking tho, every engine sensor has a margin of acceptable readings, if it reads out of that the ECM eventually learns to ignore it and switches over to an alternate means of running the engine. So now the MAF is reading higher flow numbers at any given engine speed (just cause tis a 351 engine, and not a 302), what if those flow numbers are out of the ECM's acceptable range? Again, I don't know how wide that acceptable readings band os fir this 302 ECM, but wouldn't that make sense?
Oh, okay, I misread you then - I thought you suggested running a 351 computer, hence why I pointed out the whole batch-fire vs SEFI thing.
I see, sorry about that. I meant that if the 302 were not MAF, then a 351 computer was a good idea. Since it is MAF, it should be okay with the 302 computer.
So now the MAF is reading higher flow numbers at any given engine speed (just cause tis a 351 engine, and not a 302), what if those flow numbers are out of the ECM's acceptable range? Again, I don't know how wide that acceptable readings band os fir this 302 ECM, but wouldn't that make sense?
I see what you mean. I'm not sure if the computer has an acceptable range of mass flows for each RPM or if it just uses the full MAF sensor voltage range as acceptable regardless of RPM.