3.5 EcoBoost
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,308
Likes: 42
From: SW Virginia
3.5 EcoBoost
Just ran across this. We've all debated about this engine and now it looks promising from an MPG standpoint. This is in the Lincoln MKS but I wonder how it will do in the trucks. I guess time will tell.
Ford details how EcoBoost will be more powerful, eco-friendly than competition
Ford details how EcoBoost will be more powerful, eco-friendly than competition
Logistics Pro
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,512
Likes: 18
From: Detroit
Just ran across this. We've all debated about this engine and now it looks promising from an MPG standpoint. This is in the Lincoln MKS but I wonder how it will do in the trucks. I guess time will tell.
Ford details how EcoBoost will be more powerful, eco-friendly than competition
Ford details how EcoBoost will be more powerful, eco-friendly than competition
I just don't think there will be a long-term payoff in total cost of ownership on the EcoBoost once the cost of repairs is figured in. I don't see these as 200k-300k mile engines, which I consider the modular motors to be without much trouble at all.
George
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
It'll take a lot of time to tell how they *really* do, like when we have 15 year old EcoBoost trucks being run on the cheapest gas possible, overloaded, low on oil, etc, by lawn crews.
I just don't think there will be a long-term payoff in total cost of ownership on the EcoBoost once the cost of repairs is figured in. I don't see these as 200k-300k mile engines, which I consider the modular motors to be without much trouble at all.
George
I just don't think there will be a long-term payoff in total cost of ownership on the EcoBoost once the cost of repairs is figured in. I don't see these as 200k-300k mile engines, which I consider the modular motors to be without much trouble at all.
George
Logistics Pro
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,512
Likes: 18
From: Detroit
There are certainly a small number of any engine that die prematurely, but I'd say the mod motors in general are as long-lived as most anything out there.
George
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
25mpg in a MKS. I am actually a little disappointed by that. Because, if it gets 25 in a car, I would think you will be lucky to get 21-22 in a F-150. The 4.6 3v can do that. Hopefully it will do better than I am thinking. Maybe there will be a significant difference in city fuel mileage.
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 3
From: Kzoo
So this engine will require premium correct? And if it does then I just can't see why anyone would choose this engine over the 4.6l 3v that runs on regular.
Trending Topics
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,698
Likes: 4
From: Neenah, Wisconsin
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 3
From: Kzoo
Really!? That surprises me, you'd think it would need premium since it runs a little cooler and these engines I imagine create a lot of heat. Well thats good then! Maybe this engine will be a hit after all.
MMNC (SS)(Ret)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,602
Likes: 148
From: SE Georgia
still...it's a small motor running a decent amount of boost in a 5,000 to 6,000 lb truck...and it will be severely taxed with towing/hauling
I cannot see the ecoboost being a good option for the F-150. I can foresee it being an option for 1-2 yrs, then getting dumped once the reliability issues come to light as it is used as a TRUCK ENGINE...and not a MPG gimmick
I cannot see the ecoboost being a good option for the F-150. I can foresee it being an option for 1-2 yrs, then getting dumped once the reliability issues come to light as it is used as a TRUCK ENGINE...and not a MPG gimmick
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
25mpg in a MKS. I am actually a little disappointed by that. Because, if it gets 25 in a car, I would think you will be lucky to get 21-22 in a F-150. The 4.6 3v can do that. Hopefully it will do better than I am thinking. Maybe there will be a significant difference in city fuel mileage.
Thing is the EB won't feel underpowered compared to the the 4.6L. so not a fair comparison.
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 509
Likes: 1
still...it's a small motor running a decent amount of boost in a 5,000 to 6,000 lb truck...and it will be severely taxed with towing/hauling
I cannot see the ecoboost being a good option for the F-150. I can foresee it being an option for 1-2 yrs, then getting dumped once the reliability issues come to light as it is used as a TRUCK ENGINE...and not a MPG gimmick
I cannot see the ecoboost being a good option for the F-150. I can foresee it being an option for 1-2 yrs, then getting dumped once the reliability issues come to light as it is used as a TRUCK ENGINE...and not a MPG gimmick
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,006
Likes: 1,517
From: Maine, Virginia
Not crackin' yer onions, just curious.
Talking about MPG's, the Ford website says the Flex with the 3.5L EB is rated at 22mpg's HWY. Lots of power, not great mileage.
Tim
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 509
Likes: 1
OK, Which engines on the road do you consider 200-300K engines? If you don't think a Ford gasser will make that lofty goal, then why are shopping for a Ford truck?
Not crackin' yer onions, just curious.
Talking about MPG's, the Ford website says the Flex with the 3.5L EB is rated at 22mpg's HWY. Lots of power, not great mileage.
Tim
Not crackin' yer onions, just curious.
Talking about MPG's, the Ford website says the Flex with the 3.5L EB is rated at 22mpg's HWY. Lots of power, not great mileage.
Tim