Slight pinging in 3.0
#17
I put in 93 octane and the pinging went away. Seemed like it had more power, which leads me to think that it may be doing a silent preignitioning other times. I put in some of the Chevrons Techron Cocentrate Plus that pawpaw recommended. It was on sale 2 for 1 at Advanced Auto. Will run that through. Thinking a buildup in the cylinders may be what I am looking at. These trucks should run fine on low octane right?
Well from the results you got, from going to a higher octane fuel & the pinging stopping & if you have the correct heat range spark plugs in, it kinda suggests that combustion chamber deposits may indeed be the problem & with the vehicles mileage, it's to be expected.
So, during this tank of Techron treated gas, do the spirited driving, high rpm blow it out routine, of Fords decarbon TSB & then see how it goes with 87 octane regular gas, after you use most of this treated tank up.
If you need too, do a second treatment.
Yes these engines are designd to use 87 octane.
I don't think one tank of 93 octane is likely to deposit foul the spark plugs, but Pablo is right about not using it constantly, in low compression engines & it causing deposit problems.
Using 93 octane in our low compression engines is sorta like retarding the spark timing, as it's more difficult to ignite & burns slower, so an engine like ours, thats timed closer to TDC, doesn't have time for all the 93 octane fuel to burn, before the exhaust valve opens, so all the fuel isn't consumed & can cause combustion chamber deposits over time.
Also things like the exhaust valve & manafold, cat converter, run hotter than designed, so long term use of higher than designed for octane fuel, isn't a good idea because of deposit loading in these engines & Ford so says in our owners manual.
Keep us posted on how it goes.
#19
OK, good feedback.
Well from the results you got, from going to a higher octane fuel & the pinging stopping & if you have the correct heat range spark plugs in, it kinda suggests that combustion chamber deposits may indeed be the problem & with the vehicles mileage, it's to be expected.
So, during this tank of Techron treated gas, do the spirited driving, high rpm blow it out routine, of Fords decarbon TSB & then see how it goes with 87 octane regular gas, after you use most of this treated tank up.
If you need too, do a second treatment.
Yes these engines are designd to use 87 octane.
I don't think one tank of 93 octane is likely to deposit foul the spark plugs, but Pablo is right about not using it constantly, in low compression engines & it causing deposit problems.
Using 93 octane in our low compression engines is sorta like retarding the spark timing, as it's more difficult to ignite & burns slower, so an engine like ours, thats timed closer to TDC, doesn't have time for all the 93 octane fuel to burn, before the exhaust valve opens, so all the fuel isn't consumed & can cause combustion chamber deposits over time.
Also things like the exhaust valve & manafold, cat converter, run hotter than designed, so long term use of higher than designed for octane fuel, isn't a good idea because of deposit loading in these engines & Ford so says in our owners manual.
Keep us posted on how it goes.
Well from the results you got, from going to a higher octane fuel & the pinging stopping & if you have the correct heat range spark plugs in, it kinda suggests that combustion chamber deposits may indeed be the problem & with the vehicles mileage, it's to be expected.
So, during this tank of Techron treated gas, do the spirited driving, high rpm blow it out routine, of Fords decarbon TSB & then see how it goes with 87 octane regular gas, after you use most of this treated tank up.
If you need too, do a second treatment.
Yes these engines are designd to use 87 octane.
I don't think one tank of 93 octane is likely to deposit foul the spark plugs, but Pablo is right about not using it constantly, in low compression engines & it causing deposit problems.
Using 93 octane in our low compression engines is sorta like retarding the spark timing, as it's more difficult to ignite & burns slower, so an engine like ours, thats timed closer to TDC, doesn't have time for all the 93 octane fuel to burn, before the exhaust valve opens, so all the fuel isn't consumed & can cause combustion chamber deposits over time.
Also things like the exhaust valve & manafold, cat converter, run hotter than designed, so long term use of higher than designed for octane fuel, isn't a good idea because of deposit loading in these engines & Ford so says in our owners manual.
Keep us posted on how it goes.
#20
Yup, the cat converter has to process any unburned hydrocarbons, so anything left over form the engines power stroke & pumped down stream to it, causes it to run hotter than designed for & that plays havoc on it's matrix!!!!
Our low compression engines compression ratio, cam & spark timing & computer programming are optimized for 87 octane, so when we use a higher octane slower buring fuel than specified, the engines compression, valve & spark timing just aren't right, to be able to take full advantage of the higher octane fuels btu's, so some of those unburned hydrocarbons go to waste & cause down stream mischief, a vicious circle as you've outlined!!!!
Also another reason we shouldn't ignore a misfire, or over rich code, as that too pumps unburned fuel down stream, for the cat converter to process!!!!
Sometimes, little things mean a lot!!!! lol
Our low compression engines compression ratio, cam & spark timing & computer programming are optimized for 87 octane, so when we use a higher octane slower buring fuel than specified, the engines compression, valve & spark timing just aren't right, to be able to take full advantage of the higher octane fuels btu's, so some of those unburned hydrocarbons go to waste & cause down stream mischief, a vicious circle as you've outlined!!!!
Also another reason we shouldn't ignore a misfire, or over rich code, as that too pumps unburned fuel down stream, for the cat converter to process!!!!
Sometimes, little things mean a lot!!!! lol
#22
Ok, after a tank with the treatment I am now back on 87 octane. Seems to have a little more power and be running smoother. Further leading me to believe it was doing some silent preignitioning too. Not having the audible pinging so far and I have gone about 60 miles on the low octane. Still thinking of doing another tank of the treatment in a month or so.
Thanks all, for the input, suggestions, and tech explinations!
Thanks all, for the input, suggestions, and tech explinations!
#23
Good to hear you seem to have gotten positive results.
If you later find the ping returns, no need to use premium fuel for the next treatment.
Just add the Techron at the pump, before filling up with regular Chevron, Texaco, or CalTex, so it'll mix well.
Just be sure to add the specfied oz/gal ratio of Techron, so it'll be effective & run most of the treated tank out.
Adding the Techron & filling up with one of those three fuels, all of which already have some Techron in them, raises the treat rate 10X above the pump gas concentration, so, often one treatment is enough.
If you'll continue to use one of those three fuels, they'll continue to tidy things up inside, just at a slower rate, so you may not need another treatment.
More thoughts for consideration.
Let us know how it goes.
If you later find the ping returns, no need to use premium fuel for the next treatment.
Just add the Techron at the pump, before filling up with regular Chevron, Texaco, or CalTex, so it'll mix well.
Just be sure to add the specfied oz/gal ratio of Techron, so it'll be effective & run most of the treated tank out.
Adding the Techron & filling up with one of those three fuels, all of which already have some Techron in them, raises the treat rate 10X above the pump gas concentration, so, often one treatment is enough.
If you'll continue to use one of those three fuels, they'll continue to tidy things up inside, just at a slower rate, so you may not need another treatment.
More thoughts for consideration.
Let us know how it goes.
#25
It's time to replace my plugs, 98,000mi and I am still trying to decide whether or not to put AGsf-12pp or AGSF-22pp in my 2002 ranger 3.0. I had the same pinging problem you described early in the trucks life and I have used premium ever since and never had a problem. But this leads me to believe the problem may have been the original plugs?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Milwaukee1979F150
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
9
10-04-2010 12:17 PM