Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Level, AAL, 35's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #16  
cpdorroh's Avatar
cpdorroh
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by montecarlo31
That's crazy. My wife's Grand Prix GTP has a payload rating close to that. Why are they so low? What is your front and rear axle ratings? That's very scary. 4 good size guys going out to lunch would have it over the "rated" load. I've seen some w/ 4,000 lbs on the rear and some with 3,600 or something crazy low like that. Why such a huge difference? I don't remember what my 03 F-150 was rated at but my current personal truck (gasp 1500 LD chevy) is rated at 3950 front and 4,000 rear and 7000 combined. I think my company expedition is 3750 front and 4,250 rear, 7800 or 7600 total (I think?).
There is a very lengthy and extensive thread on here that discussed this issue to exhaustion. Pretty much the point is that the advertised payload is a max that doesn't take into account the weight of any additional options you get on the truck. Chevy, Dodge, and Toyota all do this in their advertising as well. Basically, to get your truck's true payload rating, look at the sticker in the door jamb, which supposedly takes into account the additional weight of any options. Vehicles produced before a certain year don't have it listed there. If you want more info, look for the big "payload" thread.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #17  
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,308
Likes: 42
From: SW Virginia
You mean this one?

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...-question.html

That has to be some kind of record - 269 posts all about F-150 payloads. Excellent information none the less.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #18  
cpdorroh's Avatar
cpdorroh
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by powerstroke72
You mean this one?

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...-question.html

That has to be some kind of record - 269 posts all about F-150 payloads. Excellent information none the less.
Oh gawd.... I hope that d@#* thing doesn't get resurrected.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 08:30 PM
  #19  
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,308
Likes: 42
From: SW Virginia
Yeah, me too but it was a good discussion and it led to a lot of very interesting info. I would have never in a million years guessed some of those numbers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 08:30 PM
  #20  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cpdorroh
Oh gawd.... I hope that d@#* thing doesn't get resurrected.
I think it should be a sticky. It's a good bit of info for people to know before they buy a truck thinking it can carry what they advertise. Even the Ford rep who got back to me in the ned said that 900lbs is s stupid rateing for a truck that size lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 04:18 AM
  #21  
cpdorroh's Avatar
cpdorroh
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Definitely some good info in that thread. I just felt like it was beating a dead horse by the end.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #22  
TheFist's Avatar
TheFist
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 5
Can I hijack this thread for one question. I've done a search on this and can't find an answer.

I've got a set of new BFG Mud Terrain KM2, 305/60/18. Anybody know if they'll fit without rubbing on a stock height F150 4X4, FX4 with 18" wheels?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 12:48 PM
  #23  
TheFist's Avatar
TheFist
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 5
The above tires are about 31-1/2" high and 11" wide. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #24  
Agdoctor's Avatar
Agdoctor
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TheFist
The above tires are about 31-1/2" high and 11" wide. Thanks.
the BFGs cost me 365 installed at discount tire.

the above tires are actually 32.4X12.0

EPW
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 02:58 AM
  #25  
BartStar's Avatar
BartStar
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
when i installed the 2" front level kit on my 05 F150 it ruined its smooth ride and it caused the front CV Joint to bend at an extreme angle
learned my lesson, won't do that to my new 09 F150
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 07:09 AM
  #26  
Agdoctor's Avatar
Agdoctor
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BartStar
when i installed the 2" front level kit on my 05 F150 it ruined its smooth ride and it caused the front CV Joint to bend at an extreme angle
learned my lesson, won't do that to my new 09 F150
my ride hasnt changed at all, i had one on my 06 for 35,000 miles without a problem. i plan on getting the Rancho lieft when its available, but wanted to go woth larger tires now. WAS going to wait for Rancho, but they couldnt even tell me when the lift that was announced in November would be available.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 04:20 PM
  #27  
wreedZ71's Avatar
wreedZ71
More Turbo
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX
Where did you get the AAL?
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #28  
04XLTRUNNER's Avatar
04XLTRUNNER
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, TX
Originally Posted by BartStar
when i installed the 2" front level kit on my 05 F150 it ruined its smooth ride and it caused the front CV Joint to bend at an extreme angle
learned my lesson, won't do that to my new 09 F150
thats funny cause i put the 2.5" kit on my 05 and never caused a problem. ride was fine, (had mudgrapplers so it wasnt the smoothest), and as far as the cv's go. there was no "extreme" angle. yeah it angled them a little but. a 6" put more of an angle on the cv's even with the dropdown than a 2" level does. and mine got flexed offroad quite a bit. never had a problem with the axles.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #29  
wreedZ71's Avatar
wreedZ71
More Turbo
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX
Originally Posted by 04XLTRUNNER
thats funny cause i put the 2.5" kit on my 05 and never caused a problem. ride was fine, (had mudgrapplers so it wasnt the smoothest), and as far as the cv's go. there was no "extreme" angle. yeah it angled them a little but. a 6" put more of an angle on the cv's even with the dropdown than a 2" level does. and mine got flexed offroad quite a bit. never had a problem with the axles.

Same here, your kit was installed wrong or something. My angles are not extreme at all.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #30  
04XLTRUNNER's Avatar
04XLTRUNNER
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, TX
im about to get either a level kit or a 6inch for my 09. think im gonna go with the 6in and 37's on some new 20's.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.