Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

not impressed with towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #16  
aldridgec's Avatar
aldridgec
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 84
From: Wake Forest, NC
CAT BACK? Is this a manual california truck?
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #17  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bubba828
...4000lbs trailer, 1000lbs in the bed and an extended cab full of people and when going up the the steep hills i could only do 55mph ...do these numbers sound about right to you?...
Based on the above I estimate your GCW as about 13,500 lb. Your towing performance only depends on how much FWHP you apply to the road as RWHP, but your transmission gear ratios, differential ratio, and tire diameter determine the MPH speed at which you can apply a given amount of FWHP to the road as RWHP!

My ballpark estimate for your load is that to maintain a 55 MPH speed you need about 75 RWHP to tow that load on the flat and about 175 RWHP to tow that load up a 4% grade. The graph below gives RWHP vs MPH for an auto tranny with a 3.73 diff and stock 31.6" diameter tires.

Note that these RWHP curves are for a 90 HP chip so if your truck is stock you need to subtract about 90 RWHP at the MPH speeds in the vicinity of the RWHP maximums but a progressively less RWHP adjustment is required at MPH speeds further from the RWHP maximums. Also if you have a 3.73 diff and oversize 35" diameter tires all of these curves move about a 10% MPH to the right or conversely just read the RWHP at a 10% lower MPH than your actual MPH speed.

For example at 55 MPH in 4th gear the red curve shows a 195 RWHP but for oversize 35" diameter tires you use the 175 RWHP at 50 MPH. So if you had a 90 HP chip you'd need all of the available RWHP at 55 MPH to tow that load up a 4% grade, but an auto tranny will automatically downshift to 3rd gear before allowing you to fully load the engine and use all the available HP in 4th gear.

So look at 3rd gear and the blue curve gives about 260 RWHP at 50 MPH which is about 55 MPH for 35" tires. Without the 90 HP chip you only get about 180 RWHP at 55 MPH for 35" tires versus the 175 RWHP that's required to tow that load up a 4% grade at 55 MPH. So if your "steep hill" is about a 4% grade and you have a stock truck with an auto tranny in 3rd gear with a 3.73 diff and oversize 35" diameter tires I'd say that a maximum speed of 55 MPH is exactly correct!

The reason you shouldn't do any serious towing with oversize tires is because they reduce your braking ability, increase your braking distance, and on a long steep downgrade your brakes will fade! Please note that changing to a lower diff ratio like a 4.10, 4.30, or a 4.88 won't compensate one bit for the adverse effect that oversize tires have on your braking ability!

 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #18  
nunya001's Avatar
nunya001
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
I pull 5K pounds with a similar load in truck up grades in the Rockies with no problems and power to spare - sounds like you have an issue. At the risk of being redundant - gauges.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #19  
StillNotKing's Avatar
StillNotKing
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
'02 7.3 here... when I was running full stock and pulling a 3-horse slant loaded for bear and a camper, I was screwing around and passing people at 75+ in the mountain passes.

Now, with improved tuning and several small and cheap mods, I am hitting the same speeds with the same load at 2MPG better and at 150 degrees cooler and faster response.

You've got a performance problem, straight up. You ought to be rocking that payload.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #20  
Bubba828's Avatar
Bubba828
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Roseburg, OR
wow thank you for all the responses.

ernesteugene: thank you so much so the response. i have read a few of your other posts and can tell that math is your friend.

there seems to be a little discrepancy on what the truck should. i didnt think the tires would make that big of a difference in how it towed, but perhaps it does. as far as braking goes, i know that the trailer brakes werent working and the truck didnt even seem to care.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 09:56 PM
  #21  
whjco's Avatar
whjco
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Bubba,

I pull a 9500# car trailer and a 5500# travel trailer with both of my 7.3 trucks and they'll both walk up hills with a load. I'll bet you've got a 3.55 rear end and those 35" tires are just gearing you too high.

However, as good as the brakes are in the truck, I wouldn't recommend towing a trailer of that weight without any brakes.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 10:05 PM
  #22  
HKusp's Avatar
HKusp
Lead Driver
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,760
Likes: 27
From: Hampton, Maryland.
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Izzy351
I'd be surprised that the gears would do that. I think Scott (TexasOutlaw) tows with a similar setup and stock gears (IIANM) and has no problems. I pulled my Dad's 6500+ pound boat, and it was like it wasn't even there.
I am with Joe here. I am towing with 315's and 3.73's. I have a steel 2 horse slant and it has a dressing room and a sheotload of tack in the dressing room. It pulls fine. I agree with everyone else that says you have a boost issue, or maybe a fuel delivery issue.

Originally Posted by Bubba828
wow thank you for all the responses.

ernesteugene: thank you so much so the response. i have read a few of your other posts and can tell that math is your friend.
You know how they say, "it ain't rocket science"? He is actually a retired rocket scientist. Math is definitely Ernest's "thing".
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 10:14 PM
  #23  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bubba828
...as far as braking goes, i know that the trailer brakes werent working and the truck didnt even seem to care ...
Believe me the lawyers will care if you hit someone! Since you might not see the other thread I'll also post this here! Also check this thread to see how to test your RWHP... How to get your RWHP from a simple road test... This thread is located at:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...5&goto=newpost

Towing up a long steep mountain grade with oversize tires isn't the issue it's being able to safely descend the grade without brake fade and to make an emergency stop on the way down if a car pulls in front of you and suddenly slows or if someone pulls onto the highway from a side road and doesn't get up to speed quickly!

For a given brake pedal pressure which translates to a given clamping force on the disks and a given braking TQ lb-ft on the wheels a tire of radius R ft applies a braking force F lb to the road that's given by... F={TQ}/{R} lb. For a given braking TQ lb-ft on the wheels a 37" diameter tire reduces the total braking force F lb that the tires apply to the road by 17% and a 35" diameter tire reduces the total braking force by 11%, both compared to a stock 31.6" tire.

This means that to maintain a steady speed during your decent you need to work your brakes 11% to 17% harder and this produces more heat and eventually results in hot brakes that fade. In an emergency stop you have at least 11% to 17% less maximum braking force even if your brakes are cool and this increases your braking distance considerably and if the brakes are hot you might not have much emergency braking force at all!

As a retired fulltime RVer I'm not in a rush and I'm one of the most conservative drivers you'll find on the road but in 10 years of towing I've had to make several emergency stops that literally only left a few feet of margin! In other words if I'd had 35" tires on my F350 instead of the stock 31.6" tires I would've through no fault of my own crashed several times over! Not big life ending crashes but significant enough crashes to drastically increase my insurance premiums!

The following analysis is simplified to illustrate a few key points so it neglects aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance. The kinetic ENERGY KE ft-lb of a truck and trailer weighing a GCW lb and moving at a given MPH is given by KE={(GCW)(MPH^2)}/{30} ft-lb. To stop this GCW this amount of kinetic ENERGY must be dissipated by the brakes in the form of an equal ft-lb amount of heat ENERGY.

The maximum braking force F lb that can be applied to the road without losing traction and skidding is F={(u)(GCW)} where u is the dimensionless coefficient of friction. If this maximum braking force F lb is applied over a distance D ft that's parallel to the F the ft-lb amount of WORK W that's done is W={(F)(D)} ft-lb, and the amount of KE that's dissipated by the brakes as heat energy is KE=W={(F)(D)} ft-lb.

If you set KE={(GCW)(MPH^2)}/{30}=W={(F)(D)} and solve for D you get D={(GCW)(MPH^2)}/{(F)(30)} ft, and now substitute F={(u)(GCW)} in to this equation and get D={(GCW)(MPH^2)}/{(u)(GCW)(30)}={(MPH^2)}/{(u)(30)} ft, and since the GCW term cancels this dives D={(MPH^2)}/{(u)(30)} ft. Note that this equation says that if your brakes are powerful enough to apply the maximum "skid free" braking force to the road your minimum stopping distance D ft doesn't depend on your GCW lb!!!

If you assume MPH=60 and u=0.8 then D={(MPH^2)}/{(u)(30)}={(60^2)}/{(0.8)(30)}=150 ft so the laws of Physics say that if your brakes are powerful enough any GCW should stop within 150 ft from an initial 60 MPH speed! I have as much trouble convincing people of this fact as I do convincing them that it's not their engine's TQ that gets them up a hill quickly, and that's why it sometimes takes equations to see these things clearly!

As I'll show no one's brakes are powerful enough to stop their GCW in 150 ft from an initial 60 MPH speed and this is why oversize tires are a big safety NO NO for towing because they further reduce the already inadequate braking capability that you do have!

I was towing a GCW=22,000 lb and that requires brakes that can produce a F={(u)(GCW)}={(0.8)(22,000)}=17,600 lb to provide the minimum stopping distance. At 60 MPH these "optimum" stopping distance brakes would need to produce an initial braking HP of... HP={(F)(MPH)}/{375)={(17,600)(60)}/{375)=2,816 HP. Since some trucks can't even lock their service brakes and stall their TQ converter I don't think their brakes will be providing this "optimum" braking HP of 2,816 HP!

At 60 MPH my GCW=22,000 lb gives a KE={(GCW)(MPH^2)}/{30}={(22,000)(60^2)}/{30}=2,640,000 ft-lb and if I want to stop that GCW in a D=500 ft distance the brakes need to provide a constant braking F of... F={KE}/{D}={2,640,000}/{500}=5,280 lb over the 500 ft distance while dissipating 2,640,000 ft-lb of heat ENERGY. That's the kinetic ENERGY you'd feel if you dropped 2,640,000 16 oz cans of beer on your foot from a height of 1 ft! That's 110,000 cases of 16 oz cans or 146,667 cases of 12 oz cans!

In general the braking distance D={(GCW)(MPH^2)}/{(F)(30)} ft, and substituting the tire force F={TQ}/{R} gives D={(GCW)(MPH^2)(R)}/{(TQ)(30)} ft. The braking torque TQ is limited by the brake design so that increasing R by 11% to 17% by using oversize tires also increases D by 11% to 17%. Now a 500 ft stopping distance becomes a 555 ft to 585 ft stopping distance!

My bottom line is that if you tow with oversize tires you've modified the Ford design and made it less safe and if you crash and cause death and destruction you'll probably get sued big time for having changed the Ford design. I know for a fact that one of the items that's always checked in any accident investigation is the tire size and load range against what the OEM specified on the door jam safety sticker!

Note that the oversize tires also compromise other safety issues like steering and handling. It's harder for me to write equations to address these issues but I'm sure a lawyer wouldn't have any problems addressing them in court!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 10:21 PM
  #24  
bdrummonds's Avatar
bdrummonds
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,584
Likes: 0
From: Millbrook Alabama
Originally Posted by whjco
Bubba,

I pull a 9500# car trailer and a 5500# travel trailer with both of my 7.3 trucks and they'll both walk up hills with a load. I'll bet you've got a 3.55 rear end and those 35" tires are just gearing you too high.

However, as good as the brakes are in the truck, I wouldn't recommend towing a trailer of that weight without any brakes.
Super Duties did not come with 3.55 gears that I know of. 99.5 to 03, 3.73,for the single rear wheel trucks(250s and 350s, 2 or 4WD unless special ordered with 4.10s) 4.10 for most duallies (although one could order a shortbed crew cab with 3.73s ) or 4.88 for the 450s and up
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #25  
jdecker88's Avatar
jdecker88
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,241
Likes: 1
From: Powder Springs, East TN
Club FTE Silver Member

SOunds like you have a cali truck since you have a cat heck it could be clogged I would gut that thing out and leave the body on there for inspection sake. Get some 4.10s and some gauges, check out the IC boots, up pipes and anything else for boost/exhaust leaks because those are always killers.

Also check into changing your fuel filter as well.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 12:29 AM
  #26  
Bubba828's Avatar
Bubba828
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Roseburg, OR
Originally Posted by jdecker88
SOunds like you have a cali truck since you have a cat heck it could be clogged I would gut that thing out and leave the body on there for inspection sake. Get some 4.10s and some gauges, check out the IC boots, up pipes and anything else for boost/exhaust leaks because those are always killers.

Also check into changing your fuel filter as well.
well i was told when i bought the truck that the cat had been removed and exhaust put in from there back. so maybe not quite a cat back exhaust
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shake-N-Bake
EcoBoost (all engine sizes)
9
Jul 20, 2015 11:52 AM
offroad_4life
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
4
Oct 9, 2014 12:11 AM
cwilson285
All Things Towing
7
Mar 7, 2005 08:05 AM
pscanlon
All Things Towing
15
Oct 30, 2002 06:03 PM
fly master
All Things Towing
1
Aug 18, 2002 09:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 10:59:05


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE