Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Running board bracket differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 08:29 PM
  #1  
51PanelMan's Avatar
51PanelMan
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,669
Likes: 13
From: San Jose, CA
Running board bracket differences

While scavenging through my parts, I came upon two sets of four running board brackets. I thought that all running board brackets were created equal, but upon closer inspection, I found them to be different. One set is longer than the other.

Does any one know why they're different? Used on different model trucks, i.e. Panel vs F1, or F2 vs F6, etc.??? I looked underneath my Panel trucks and found the brackets to be the same as the longer one pictured. However, I don't have an F1 or larger truck to compare them to.

Please help me solve this mystery.

Thanks.







 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
gearhead1952's Avatar
gearhead1952
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 1
From: Arvada, CO
The long ones with the four holes fit panel trucks, F4 thru F6 and F1 with the shorty boards. Basically the short boards need those brackets.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #3  
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52
Welder User
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 49
From: northwest MT
Club FTE Silver Member

Long ones are for a panel, short ones are for F1. Not sure about F2 thru F6........T/M
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 09:47 PM
  #4  
bobj49f2's Avatar
bobj49f2
Hotshot
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,851
Likes: 3,070
From: SE Wisc. (the Rust Belt)
Ilya,

We had this discussion a few months ago. It seems the panels, and conventional cabbed trucks with short running boards had different running board brackets than the pickups with the long running boards. I never knew this until I think it was Gear Up brought it to my attention. I went out to the garage and measured the running board brackets on my panel, which has the pickup chassis under it and no running boards yet, and then I went down in back of the farm and measured the running board brackets on the other panel, the one with the original panel truck chassis. They were different. I also measured the bracket on the F-4 and found them to be the same as the actual panels brackets.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #5  
bobj49f2's Avatar
bobj49f2
Hotshot
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,851
Likes: 3,070
From: SE Wisc. (the Rust Belt)
Dennis, I thought was you that brought the fact to my attention. I was searching the forum to find the post but couldn't find it. I would have posted sooner but I was doing the search.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 10:12 PM
  #6  
51PanelMan's Avatar
51PanelMan
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,669
Likes: 13
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by bobj49f2
Ilya,

We had this discussion a few months ago. It seems the panels, and conventional cabbed trucks with short running boards had different running board brackets than the pickups with the long running boards. I never knew this until I think it was Gear Up brought it to my attention. I went out to the garage and measured the running board brackets on my panel, which has the pickup chassis under it and no running boards yet, and then I went down in back of the farm and measured the running board brackets on the other panel, the one with the original panel truck chassis. They were different. I also measured the bracket on the F-4 and found them to be the same as the actual panels brackets.
It must have been during my hiatus (sp?).

Thanks for the explanation everyone.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #7  
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
Logistics Pro
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,361
Likes: 74
From: Utah
I dont know the answer, but that is an interesting tape measure you got there! 1/8" increments? looks like my Keson engineers "pocket rod" only its graduated in hundreths of a foot. I didn't know they would have made them in inches. seems foreign.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 02:48 PM
  #8  
51PanelMan's Avatar
51PanelMan
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,669
Likes: 13
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by jmadsen
I dont know the answer, but that is an interesting tape measure you got there! 1/8" increments? looks like my Keson engineers "pocket rod" only its graduated in hundreths of a foot. I didn't know they would have made them in inches. seems foreign.
It is a Keson, made is Japan, "pocket rod". Standard issue/use in the auto collision appraisal industry. Easy to see the numbers and divisions.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #9  
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
Logistics Pro
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,361
Likes: 74
From: Utah
Originally Posted by 51PanelMan
It is a Keson, made is Japan, "pocket rod". Standard issue/use in the auto collision appraisal industry. Easy to see the numbers and divisions.

A joke going around our office (Engineering/Surveying) say's that inches are for w h ores and Architects, oh NO and now auto collision appraisals too! I'm sorry that was not cool I'm sure i will pay for that one
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.