'05 4.0 ranger problems
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
'05 4.0 ranger problems
2005 4.0, 2wd stick with 212,000 miles. Cruise set at 75 on interstate and the engine light came on followed by a loss in power, slight rattling of valves and a bad miss. Timing chain? Ideas and suggestions appreciated. Thanks for any help.
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
ouch
Thanks, i'll check the codes asap. Had a '94 with same set up and got 400,000 out of it with no over haul or oil usage, just couldn't keep a tranny in it. I had my hopes too high for this one apparently. What's the cost of a new motor or rebuild +/-?
Super Moderator
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
First, the crank is connected to a blank in the block where the old cam used to live.
In the front of the motor, the cam for the driver side is driven off this.
In the back of the motor, the cam for the passenge side is driven.
If it had a belt on the front, it would be an improvement. A single chain would be good too...
The tensioners for these cams have a history of making noise and going bad. Mostly noise and they'll still run, but as with any cam drive like this, a failure of one or more components would not be a surprise.
The Pacifier
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 7
From: Cloverdale, BC
Trending Topics
Super Moderator
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
Well, not to backpedal on my condemnation of the cam drive set up in the 4.0 OHC, BUT:
--we do not yet know what the failure is in the OP's vehicle
--212,000 miles isn't bad & is beyond the life of many a cam-in-block drive (small block Ford, for example...)
--Ford did fiddle with the tensioner system and beyond noise, I've been told they are ok, and that even the ones in my '98--again, beyond noise which I do not have much of yet at 90,000, they are ok. They ( or at least the front one) was fiddled with under a tsb.
--the cam drive is this way to keep your worries off the 5 speed automatic at least some of the time....
I was looking at Rangers, but the V6/5 speed mt combo seems to not exist in any dealer inventory.
--we do not yet know what the failure is in the OP's vehicle
--212,000 miles isn't bad & is beyond the life of many a cam-in-block drive (small block Ford, for example...)
--Ford did fiddle with the tensioner system and beyond noise, I've been told they are ok, and that even the ones in my '98--again, beyond noise which I do not have much of yet at 90,000, they are ok. They ( or at least the front one) was fiddled with under a tsb.
--the cam drive is this way to keep your worries off the 5 speed automatic at least some of the time....
I was looking at Rangers, but the V6/5 speed mt combo seems to not exist in any dealer inventory.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Thanks for all info. The motor will be examined at end of this week and i'll keep you posted on the results. Judging by sound of valves and vibration of motor it's def. the timing chain. I'm told that jumping more than one tooth can cause valve damage in one or both heads. Worst case i'll need a engine, anyone rebuilt this motor or purchased a refurb?
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
No offense but if this is FMC's idea of an "upgrade" it will be my last ranger.... I came to that conclusion 300 miles from home on the side of an interstate.
Cargo Master
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,208
Likes: 13
My goodness 212000 miles and it broke. I'm sorry it doesn't owe you a thing. We didn't use to get 60,000 out of a timing chain or timing belt. At that kinda mileage Changing the chains and tensioners would be called PM.
What I have seen when they get that kinda of mileage on them most of the failures are catastrophic.
What I have seen when they get that kinda of mileage on them most of the failures are catastrophic.
