When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I assume he is saying from the rear of the axle to the rear of the frame.
I assume that the radius of the arm would be too short and it would try to push the axle forward as the suspension was compressed, that is why nobody makes one that attaches behind the axle.
The bar would be very steep and the arc of it's travel would want to push the axle forward......while the normal movement of the leaf springs want to push the axle rearward.
The bar would be very steep and the arc of it's travel would want to push the axle forward......while the normal movement of the leaf springs want to push the axle rearward.
Did you just agree with me? It sounds like they are counteracting one another.
DC, could you tell me or what the two black runners under the cab of your truck are? I haven't seen parts that look like that before and it caught my eye.
Thanks,
5150
Did you just agree with me? It sounds like they are counteracting one another.
If you posted that going from the rear of the axle to the rear of the frame was a bad idea and would not work well, then yes I agreed with you.
Going to from under the axle forward on the frame towards the cab is the way they need to go to work properly with the leaf springs.
Originally Posted by 5150 MAN
DC, could you tell me or what the two black runners under the cab of your truck are? I haven't seen parts that look like that before and it caught my eye.
Thanks,
5150
If you posted that going from the rear of the axle to the rear of the frame was a bad idea and would not work well, then yes I agreed with you.
My knowledge of suspension design is very limited. I just thought that I would throw the idea out there with no expectation that my idea was truly valid.
I wonder if anyone makes a bar that mounts on the rear of the axle? Would that design provide the same level of stability? The bar would be much shorter and not potentially obstruct the approach to the rear axle when off-road.
Running a traction type bar on the shackle end of the spring would eliminate the movement of the shackle itself. As the spring compresses it gets longer and the axle actually moves towards the shackle. By placing the traction bar at this end, it would eliminate the critical movement of the shackle. This is part of the reason we dont see many offereings for front axle traction bars.
On another note, the short bars would bind pretty bad, and not allow enough axle movement.
Interesting idea, but not practical.
Running a traction type bar on the shackle end of the spring would eliminate the movement of the shackle itself. As the spring compresses it gets longer and the axle actually moves towards the shackle. By placing the traction bar at this end, it would eliminate the critical movement of the shackle. This is part of the reason we dont see many offereings for front axle traction bars.
On another note, the short bars would bind pretty bad, and not allow enough axle movement.
Interesting idea, but not practical.
I really enjoy this forum because you can ask questions, kick ideas around, and find the best solutions.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.