Why say never?
An f-100 would be great.. itd be slightly larger than the ranger but not a 150. Like someone already stated, an F-100 would fall under the F-series truck statistics and would be a great selling point. the ranger hasnt won anything to advertise about. Then you could build the bronco2 off of that and screw the explorer. we already got a huge lineup of SUV's. the escape and expediton is close enough.
Update the look just a bit.
Crew cab 4 door option.
4 inches wider.
Crew cab with 5 foot bed.
Reg cab with a 6 foot or 7 foot bed.
Supercab with 5, 6, or 7 foot bed.
4.6L 3V. auto
4BT cummins auto only
4.0SOHC man or auto
2.3DOHC manual or auto
Solid front axle or use the F-150 a arms. Plenty o beef.
Make a 1/2 ton truck but with the compactness of the Ranger.
The number 1 trait that would make the Ranger sell like a hot cake is a V-8 option.
These babys would sell faster than a $5 crack rock in the slums of New York.
I have 2 Rangers and the comment I make most is, I wish it had a V-8, be it a 5.0 or 4.6 The 4.0 pulls hard and runs good but add another 75-100 HP and it would be way better than a Mustang.
Update the look just a bit.
Crew cab 4 door option.
4 inches wider.
Crew cab with 5 foot bed.
Reg cab with a 6 foot or 7 foot bed.
Supercab with 5, 6, or 7 foot bed.
4.6L 3V. auto
4BT cummins auto only
4.0SOHC man or auto
2.3DOHC manual or auto
Solid front axle or use the F-150 a arms. Plenty o beef.
Make a 1/2 ton truck but with the compactness of the Ranger.
The number 1 trait that would make the Ranger sell like a hot cake is a V-8 option.
These babys would sell faster than a $5 crack rock in the slums of New York.
I have 2 Rangers and the comment I make most is, I wish it had a V-8, be it a 5.0 or 4.6 The 4.0 pulls hard and runs good but add another 75-100 HP and it would be way better than a Mustang.




