Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

New Tires; Thin vs. Fat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #1  
skoveng's Avatar
skoveng
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
New Tires; Thin vs. Fat

Did a search and could not find this topic.

I'm getting ready for new skins; I either going with 235/85R16 or 285/75R16.

My driving is 95% highway, I'm here in the Phila. area so we get snow but not like the old days so I'm thinking of a good M/S.

Do you guys perfer the bigger fatter or the taller thinner tires, why?

Thanks for any input.

Steve
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #2  
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,404
Likes: 52
From: Wheatland, Mo
Club FTE Silver Member

I like the looks of the 285-75-16...But prefer the OEM size...265-70-16 for snow traction. I have found that the wider the tire, the more it packs the snow instead of cutting it.

Ummmm Are you sure of the 235 measurement? That seems too narrow.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #3  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
My truck came with 235/85R16s from factory and I have 285/75R16s on now. Theres no comparing the two IMO. I have far better traction in all conditions with the 285s including snow. My 285s are more aggressive than the 235s were but..... Never going back to 235/85s or 265/75s.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
skoveng's Avatar
skoveng
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
My F250 originally can with the 235/85R16's. I moved to 265/75R16 which are now bologna skins.

My truck is a 6.0, CC, LB 4X4
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #5  
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,404
Likes: 52
From: Wheatland, Mo
Club FTE Silver Member

Hmmm interesting....I thought the 265 were the OEM size. Oh well....
JMO
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #6  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Originally Posted by BillyBob69
Hmmm interesting....I thought the 265 were the OEM size. Oh well....
JMO
There were different tires options. If you got the optional A/T OWL tires you got 265/75R16 if you got the standard BSW tires they were usually 235/85R16s. Both the 235s and 265s have almost identical diameters because of the aspect ratio. I believe duallys usually came with 235s also.

My dads 99' and his 03' both came with the 265 firestone steeltexs because he got the optional OWL A/T tires. My dad was a happy camper when he got rid of the steeltexs on both trucks and went to 285 BF A/Ts, those steeltexs were horrible tires traction wise. My 04' came with the standard BSW 235s.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
skunk250's Avatar
skunk250
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
I have had 325's (13.5") with my 07 CC 250 and I am very impressed with the traction in the snow. I have heard some make the argument that thinner tires are better in the snow but from my personal expierience with highway driving, I feel very comfortable with the wider tires in white stuff. Braking sucks in the snow any way you look at it but I am sure that your tire type will also affect the performance in adverse weather conditions.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #8  
jim henderson's Avatar
jim henderson
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
A lot of factors go into a tire's snow performance. Width is just one factor.

Also important are big open blocks of tread to throw off snow and prevent packing.

Rubber compound designed to flex in snow and throw off snow.

Siping, small cuts in tread to give rubber many edges to grab on ice.

Maybe bubbles in the rubber to cat like mini suction cups. Blizzaks and maybe a couple others have these.

I probably missed a few of these, since 1) I have lived most of my life in southern Calif. 2) I am not a tire expert.

I did live for about 14 years in Oregon and my experience is that it is more important how you drive, but your tires do make a difference. I had an Impala SS with big fat tires, got along fine in snow, ice was tricky, even my blizzaks were marginal.

Studded tires work well in ice, so so in snow and are terrible on dry or wet clear pavement.

Chains are good when all else fails but good for only a few hundred miles before they drive you crazy or snap a link.

My F250 with skinny tires and 4x4 is OK in most snow, not good on ice. I even towed my 30 foot travel trailer in snowy mountains at low speed just fine, even when others in 4x4 and no trailer, stopped driving.

OH, back to reasons... 3) I am not too bright.

In general I would say narrow tires work better for me on snow and ice(Barely). I can get around fine on fat tires if I drive carefully. Hard dry COLD ice is easy to drive on. It is the sloppy just wet snow or ice that is dangerous.

Jim Henderson
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #9  
cartmanea's Avatar
cartmanea
Lead Driver
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,757
Likes: 5
From: Corvallis, OR
Stockers are 235/85/16 or 265/75/16 depending on the trim package. I would go with the latter or a 285/75/16 since the 235s look way too small.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #10  
Ace!'s Avatar
Ace!
Cargo Master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 3
From: So Oregon
Taller, thinner, everyday and for almost all occassions.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #11  
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
Carl Lassiter
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: CA
Personally, I like 275s on SRW Super Duty's for all occassions. 235 andd 285 are two extremes so you could split the difference
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #12  
Fair 96's Avatar
Fair 96
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Ace!
Taller, thinner, everyday and for almost all occassions.
Lived in Northern Canada for 20 years and agree totally with Ace..
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #13  
sonneborn3's Avatar
sonneborn3
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, IL
The fatter the better! JMO
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #14  
Ace!'s Avatar
Ace!
Cargo Master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 3
From: So Oregon
Originally Posted by sonneborn3
The fatter the better! JMO
We're still talking tires, right?
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #15  
cartmanea's Avatar
cartmanea
Lead Driver
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,757
Likes: 5
From: Corvallis, OR
Originally Posted by sonneborn3
The fatter the better! JMO
Not on snow and ice! I have 35x12.50 tires now, I think my next set will be 285/75/18 which is about a 35x11.50
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE