Delo vs Valvoline UOA comparison ???
#1
Delo vs Valvoline UOA comparison ???
OK, so I think my engine is finally broken in now, and my curiosity has gotten the better of me. I decided to try getting an oil analysis, which I don't really understand all (or most) of the numbers, then decided to start trying different oils to see if one showed better than the others.
Blackstone says all is well with my engine, but can anyone explain to me what each of these items are (I know the fuel, antifreeze, water and the simple ones)? For those who have done this more than twice, is it common for some of the numbers to move up or down a point or two?
I see a big jump in Molybdenum & Boron, and a big drop in Magnesium between the two samples. I'm guessing these are part of some additive or base part of the oil, but I don't know if I should be wanting higher or lower numbers with these.
If you had to choose an oil based on the two columns listed, which one would be better? I did run B20 for about 60% of the miles on the Delo test if that makes a difference. I was curious to see if I would get a higher fuel reading since Ford thinks shorter change intervals are required if you're running B5 or greater. Looks like the fuel part checked out ok.
The column on the left is the most recent analysis done of Delo 15w-40. The column on the right is my first analysis done of the Carquest private labeled Valvoline 15w-40.
I've got Delvac in the truck for another 1800 miles, then I'll get that tested. I think I'll swap to Rotella for the test after that. I'll post up the other results as I get them to hear any comments.
Blackstone says all is well with my engine, but can anyone explain to me what each of these items are (I know the fuel, antifreeze, water and the simple ones)? For those who have done this more than twice, is it common for some of the numbers to move up or down a point or two?
I see a big jump in Molybdenum & Boron, and a big drop in Magnesium between the two samples. I'm guessing these are part of some additive or base part of the oil, but I don't know if I should be wanting higher or lower numbers with these.
If you had to choose an oil based on the two columns listed, which one would be better? I did run B20 for about 60% of the miles on the Delo test if that makes a difference. I was curious to see if I would get a higher fuel reading since Ford thinks shorter change intervals are required if you're running B5 or greater. Looks like the fuel part checked out ok.
The column on the left is the most recent analysis done of Delo 15w-40. The column on the right is my first analysis done of the Carquest private labeled Valvoline 15w-40.
I've got Delvac in the truck for another 1800 miles, then I'll get that tested. I think I'll swap to Rotella for the test after that. I'll post up the other results as I get them to hear any comments.
#3
does this helP??
Blackstone Laboratories - Gasoline Diesel Report Expl
Blackstone Laboratories - Gasoline Diesel Report Expl
So does anyone know which additives are better to have in the engine?
#4
Delo recently re-formulated their additives package.
On the same oil, and adding a quart or two of "make-up oil", my "trace elements" changed around, too. I think the moly increased a bunch, and when I asked them about it they wrote:
"Magnesium has increased in this engine's oil recently. It is most commonly
a detergent/dispersant added at manufacture. It will help keep particles in
suspension in the oil so that they may be filtered. Some Delo 400 15W/40
samples that we've tested recently have had a higher concentration of
magnesium, others have not. Calcium is another detergent/dispersant; it's
usually quite prevalent in engine oil. In the case of your engine, you will
notice that over time, calcium has decreased a bit while magnesium has
increased. It could very well be that the additive mix in this oil has been
slightly modified. Higher magnesium readings shouldn't have any negative
effects on performance. Note that that the level of boron has also
increased. This is another dispersant/detergent element in the oil. Oil
companies will tinker with additive packages, in order to find the right
balance to improve oil performance. This should not be problematic for your
engine in any way. The wear trends that we've seen in your Navistar are
enviable, so you've obviously been doing the right things to keep it that
way. I hope that this message helps you out. If you have any other
questions or comments, feel free to contact us.
Stephen Zulkowski
Blackstone Labs
Does that fit what you're seeing?
Pop
On the same oil, and adding a quart or two of "make-up oil", my "trace elements" changed around, too. I think the moly increased a bunch, and when I asked them about it they wrote:
"Magnesium has increased in this engine's oil recently. It is most commonly
a detergent/dispersant added at manufacture. It will help keep particles in
suspension in the oil so that they may be filtered. Some Delo 400 15W/40
samples that we've tested recently have had a higher concentration of
magnesium, others have not. Calcium is another detergent/dispersant; it's
usually quite prevalent in engine oil. In the case of your engine, you will
notice that over time, calcium has decreased a bit while magnesium has
increased. It could very well be that the additive mix in this oil has been
slightly modified. Higher magnesium readings shouldn't have any negative
effects on performance. Note that that the level of boron has also
increased. This is another dispersant/detergent element in the oil. Oil
companies will tinker with additive packages, in order to find the right
balance to improve oil performance. This should not be problematic for your
engine in any way. The wear trends that we've seen in your Navistar are
enviable, so you've obviously been doing the right things to keep it that
way. I hope that this message helps you out. If you have any other
questions or comments, feel free to contact us.
Stephen Zulkowski
Blackstone Labs
Does that fit what you're seeing?
Pop
#5
Thanks Pop. I guess singing the praises of their customers is sort of their SOP, or maybe it's just that the people actually getting an UOA are the ones that understand changing the oil is important.
Of course if the oil companies are changing their formula all the time, then I guess my comparison of different oils is kind of a waste of time.
Of course if the oil companies are changing their formula all the time, then I guess my comparison of different oils is kind of a waste of time.
#7
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: White Mnt's,New Hampshire
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
Thanks Ron. It helps to have other numbers to look at. I'm pretty sure this was the LE stuff too. I just went outside and checked, but since that's what I just put in the wife's truck, I can't be 100% sure if the bottle was from me or her. I'm 99% sure it's mine since we pumped out her HPOP too and needed the extra oil to top that off.
I guess I'll need you to teach me how to use a scanner also. I notice you're file is only 20kb, but is much clearer than my 113kb file.
I guess I'll need you to teach me how to use a scanner also. I notice you're file is only 20kb, but is much clearer than my 113kb file.
#9
Pop
#11
#12
High levels of zinc would be even better, but the EPA has the blenders putting less and less over time.
I'm going to look into additives.
I have been using RPM Delo for over 55 years, but my most recent oil change was using Rotella T-4.
Delo, as currently formulated, is (was?) not recommended by Ford for our diesels.
My Blackstones have always been good, so the next one will tell.
Pop
I'm going to look into additives.
I have been using RPM Delo for over 55 years, but my most recent oil change was using Rotella T-4.
Delo, as currently formulated, is (was?) not recommended by Ford for our diesels.
My Blackstones have always been good, so the next one will tell.
Pop
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Firefighter 1406
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
9
02-15-2017 12:27 PM
honeydew
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
23
08-19-2013 11:12 AM