Help! - Emissions problems with high NOx
88' Ranger XLT, s-cab, 2.3L, 5sp
Test results are as follows and notes will be below the numbers:
1st Test
......................15mph....................... .....25mph
................Limit......Reading................ Limit......Reading
HC ppm......179.......103.....................174.... ....107
CO%..........1.52......0.12....................1.9 6.......0.17
NO ppm......1227......3767...................1121......3439
RPM.................1698.......................... ......1908
Dilution.............14.5......................... ........14.6
Notes: Timing was somewhere around 5 deg BTDC AND the cam gear was rotated clockwise 1-2 teeth. Not to mention the EGR vacuum hose had come off the valve. All these things were discovered afterwords, but the EGR hose was not discovered until just before the 3rd test.
2nd Test
......................15mph....................... .....25mph
................Limit......Reading................ Limit......Reading
HC ppm......179.......59.......................174... .....51
CO%..........1.52......0.10....................1.9 6.......0.16
NO ppm......1227......1641...................1121......1748
RPM.................1774.......................... ......2821
Dilution.............14.8......................... ........15
Notes: Adjusted timing to spec 10 deg BTDC, rotated cam gear counter-clock wise to line up with marks on the cover. Still didn't notice the EGR hose at this point, and the results were close to passing. It was suggested I adjust the timing a little more and maybe change the plugs to get it running as clean as possible.
3rd Test:
......................15mph....................... .....25mph
................Limit......Reading................ Limit......Reading
HC ppm......179.......89.......................174... .....98
CO%..........1.52......0.13....................1.9 6.......0.25
NO ppm......1227......2201...................1121......2645
RPM.................1758.......................... ......2847
Dilution.............14.7......................... ........14.9
Notes: I changed the plugs, moved the timing to 15 deg BTDC, and changed the air filter. It was just before this run on the rollers that the hose being off the EGR was spotted. So that should have really helped lower the #s but I guess not. Or was I supposed to set timing closer to 0-5 deg BTDC to lower the NOx for this run?
At this point I have re-adjusted the timing back to factory spec (10 deg BTDC), and added a bottle of cleaner to the fuel to flush it out before the next test. All signs point to "high combustion chamber temps", but the truck never gets hot, the other readings are pretty good, it is just the NOx reading that is bad. I should also mention that there are 2 KOEO codes, 31 & 67. I have never been able to get rid of these. The 67 is due to a trans swap and nothing to worry about. The 31 is EVP below voltage (I think) and I have tried new EVP sensors, new EGR valves, but no one has the EGR solenoid in stock for me to try that, and the code never goes away. Any ideas?
If that doesn
t do the trick, you may need a new converter to pass smog.
I do have a bottle of CRC in the tank right now so I am hoping that will help since it "claims" to have a "Guaranteed to pass". I am also not to sure that replacing the converter will have much affect on it since (correct me if I am wrong) this late 80's truck should only have a 2-way converter that won't affect NOx in the first place. I don't have a problem replacing a part if it is bad, but if the converter didn't play a part in the NOx readings from the factory I can't see how it has gone 'bad". I would agree that if there is a 3-way converter available for my truck then it would help to reduce the emissions, but it would only mask the root cause of the original problem.
Also, just as a reminder, I did a basic refresh on this engine 1.5-2 years ago when it broke a head bolt and blew the head gasket....... ahhh fun times. The head was rebuilt at a machine shop, and the block was cleaned out and put back together.
Rockledge - That is a good idea if it works. Not to sound like I am doubting you...... is that the way it works? IE - keeping the timing closer to TDC will lower the combustion temps?
Other thoughts/notes: I have not had the time to check the fuel pressure at the rail, but I was assuming the "Dilution" reading on the tests indicated I was right on the mark for Air/Fuel ratio? Yes, no? I did notice a significant drop in temps as measured by my face
after moving the cam gear and adjusting the timing. The temp gauge never got above normal, but you could tell with your head under the hood that it was pretty warm under there. I am still not sure how the cam gear got rotated, but oh well, and I did realize how the timing was off in the first place. NOTE TO SELF - when using a timing light that has a built in advance **** on the back..... make sure it is still set to 0!!!!!!
I don't know if anyone remembers, but 2 years ago I couldn't get this thing through emissions for the same freaking thing: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/5...al-issues.html I do remember taking it to the Ford dealer, and paying way too much to have the timing set and re-inspected. They couldn't tell me how they got it through, nor could they tell me how they adjusted the timing. At the time I had been looking for that stupid spout connector for weeks with no success. When I got the truck back, it had passed, but had no guts below 55 mph. A month or so later I finally found the spout up by the battery on the passenger's side, and once I checked the timing they had it set at 0/TDC base timing.

Anyway, after re-reading part of the thread above...... is it true that the EGR doesn't even activate until 25+ mph????? If so then it can't be the problem at 15 mph and maybe not even at 25 mph! What gives?
If that's right, since your truck is an '88 you may indeed have the 3-way one.
Here's the article: Catalytic converter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Trending Topics
All OEM catalysts made after 1983 used some form of three way catalyst, either by using air injection, or oxygen cycling.
Have you checked or cleaned the MAF sensor? A bad MAF will most often cause a lean mixture, which will significantly raise NOX emissions. Plugged injectors or low fuel pressure will also cause the same problem. Vacuum leaks will also cause NOX problems.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Also there is no MAF on this model. I am not sure when they started, but the 88' 2.3L didn't have it. As for the rest, the majority of the sensors & hoses are new'ish (>2yr). The stuff that is likely original:
IAC
MAP
FPR
Injectors
EGR vacuum solenoid
Fuel pump - high pressure
Fuel pump - low pressure
I may, or may not have used Rock's advise to pass.
And the numbers were sill a little strange this time around:......................15mph....................... ......25mph
................Limit......Reading................ Limit......Reading
HC ppm......179.......55.......................174... ......57
CO%..........1.52......0.09....................1.9 6........0.24
NO ppm......1227.....1185....................1121.... ...613
RPM.................1735.......................... ......2827
Dilution.............14.9......................... ........14.9
The NOx at 15 mph just squeaked by, but the 25 mph was great. I am wondering if the 1/2 tank with fuel system cleaner in it is to blame for some of the #'s. The instructions did say to run the whole tank out and fill up again before testing. Well that would be at least another 200 miles, and I was 2 weeks over-due for my tags. Definitely driving on borrowed time, and I wasn't looking to attract Johnny Law.
Hey Bear River can you email me the cost of a direct replacement "3-way" converter for my truck? Thanks.
Bear River - It isn't certain that the EGR is bad, but yes I did mention that there is a code in the computer that complains about something in the EGR system.
Can anyone tell me for sure when the EGR activates? If it only comes on over 2000rpm (for example) then it won't do anything for the 15mph readings. Or is it speed activated?




