When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As I have read and researched there is not to much difference detween the 250 and the 350 rear diffs unless spec orders this truck has a nice posi in it now. and as the basics will tell more rubber on the street more traction. The engine has a Bully dog six position computer plus a Injector pressure chip Injectors are also set up for about a 120hp increase 4"down pipe 5" straight pipe exhaust Stage 3 cold air intake and Methaneole injection. The truck has not been Dynoed yet. the estimated HP is based on the math of the up grades. I am looking at building just a different truck that should run in the 11's at the strip. Cause there is nothing more fun than smoking car with a old diesel truck
As I have read and researched there is not to much difference detween the 250 and the 350 rear diffs
Thers IS a difference though. The 250 has a 35 spline shaft and the 350 has a 37, its just a touch bigger too. Figured I'd post up the numbers, it's enough to rate the truck differently I suppose. Read: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/5...-and-f350.html
And here's even more about the differences between a 250 and 350. Just copied this guys post over.
You have no traction in the snow because snow doesn't offer the friction coefficient of asphalt! If if had the same friction then a dually would have the same traction. Dually's have higher flotation in snow and rain but that can be offset (to a degree) by having weight over the wheels.
The larger the tire's contact patch, the larger the area of friction, hence the more available area for traction. Tread design, the friction coefficient of the road surface, weight displaced all have bearing on available traction.
Obviously snow doesn't have the same friction coefficient as asphalt, believe me Ive found out on more than one occasion.
Not to bust anyones gonads, but isn't higher flotation directly related to the size of the tire/tires contact patch area? I mean, why would Tanks need larger and larger tracks in order to offset their increased weights, why would off road trucks (HEMITTS and the like) have extra large wide tires?
Tire design is of the utmost importance, but so is tire sizing depending on the situation at hand.
And again, I know I'm comparing apples and oranges, but look at the the difference in tire size on a WRC Rally Car, let alone tire design, depending on the conditions of the track.