Notices
Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

2009 dodge ram full test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #1  
heathk2003's Avatar
heathk2003
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
2009 dodge ram full test

2009 Dodge Ram Sport R/T - First Test - Motor Trend
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #2  
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Denver USA
Like the 4.10:1 gears, but Dodge needs to up the 5spd to 6spds like the others are doing.

Significantly smaller brakes provide better stopping distance than the Tundra.

Also the HEMI has quicker 0-60 times than the Tundra, even with a 5spd compared to the Tundras 6spd.

Depending on the overall quality, Dodge may just have provided a competitor to Ford/Chevy.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #3  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Notice in the specs it say the recommended fuel is midgrade, which I take is 89 octane. Thats a downside IMO.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #4  
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Denver USA
Originally Posted by dkf
Notice in the specs it say the recommended fuel is midgrade, which I take is 89 octane. Thats a downside IMO.
Doesn't the 5.4L require mid grade? I know here in CO, we don't have 89, only 87, but 87 is okay to use in place of 89 here at this altitude.

So can't say it's really a downside. Just normal anymore.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #5  
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 9
From: Rhode Island
89 is a couple of cents more then 87, barely make a difference, but from what I understand, it will still run on 87 but with slightly reduce power. I guess that is a trade off of 10.5:1 compression
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #6  
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl's Avatar
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Running lower grade fuel isn't going to hurt the power in the 5.4l, which I do not beleave has enough compression to require a higher octane gas than 87. The only difference fuel makes on power is if you are running a normal motor with low compression and you get the bright idea hey lets run race gas (101 octane), which will actually hurt the power because the gas wont completely burn do to not enough heat thus not heating the air well enough. The only time you need a higher octane gas is when you are running a high compression motor. The reason you need a higher octane is so the fuel wont pre ignite from the heat during the compression stroke.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 07:14 AM
  #7  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Originally Posted by V8EXPLR
Doesn't the 5.4L require mid grade? I know here in CO, we don't have 89, only 87, but 87 is okay to use in place of 89 here at this altitude.

So can't say it's really a downside. Just normal anymore.
The 5.4ls run on a minimum of 87, unless Ford changed it for 09'. You should know, you have a 5.4l in your sig.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 07:16 AM
  #8  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Originally Posted by SUPERDUTY_untouchabl
Running lower grade fuel isn't going to hurt the power in the 5.4l, which I do not beleave has enough compression to require a higher octane gas than 87. The only difference fuel makes on power is if you are running a normal motor with low compression and you get the bright idea hey lets run race gas (101 octane), which will actually hurt the power because the gas wont completely burn do to not enough heat thus not heating the air well enough. The only time you need a higher octane gas is when you are running a high compression motor. The reason you need a higher octane is so the fuel wont pre ignite from the heat during the compression stroke.
The 3V 5.4 has a 9.8:1 CR which is high, however its runs on 87 fine.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Denver USA
Originally Posted by dkf
The 5.4ls run on a minimum of 87, unless Ford changed it for 09'. You should know, you have a 5.4l in your sig.
'06 owner guide states a minimum of 87 octane. Listed below is a link to the '06 owners guide and page #296 lists the recommendations. Here's a little tidbit.

Unleaded Gasoline engines
Your vehicle is designed to use “Regular” unleaded gasoline with an
(R+M)/2 octane rating of 87. We do not recommend the use of gasolines
labeled as “Regular” that are sold with octane ratings of 86 or lower in
high altitude areas.


http://www.motorcraftservice.com/pub.../06f12og4e.pdf

Here is the 1st release of the '09 F150 owners guide, which it also recommends 87 octane on page #373.

http://www.motorcraftservice.com/pub.../09f12og1e.pdf

Originally Posted by dkf
The 3V 5.4 has a 9.8:1 CR which is high, however its runs on 87 fine.
You think the 9.8:1 is high, just look at the 5.7L HEMI at 10.5:1 as lead head stated as does the article.
 

Last edited by V8EXPLR; Sep 5, 2008 at 09:31 AM. Reason: Forgot '09 owners guide link, dangit!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #10  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
The CR on the 5.7l is way up there, no doubt helps performance out though. Should also lend itself to a healthy just in power with 93 octane and custom tuning. I just see many people may see that the Dodge needs 89 and shy away because they don't want to pay $.10 more per gallon for fuel, who knows. Ford has about reached the max CR with the 5.4l to run 87, at least with current EFI.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #11  
DKA-78's Avatar
DKA-78
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by V8EXPLR
Like the 4.10:1 gears, but Dodge needs to up the 5spd to 6spds like the others are doing.

Significantly smaller brakes provide better stopping distance than the Tundra.

Also the HEMI has quicker 0-60 times than the Tundra, even with a 5spd compared to the Tundras 6spd.

Depending on the overall quality, Dodge may just have provided a competitor to Ford/Chevy.
Is there something I am missing about smaller brakes providing better stopping distance? I thought it was larger brakes that stopped better.


and as far as the new Dodge, I like it, I have a hard time parting with the cash that companies are asking for new cars though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #12  
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Denver USA
Originally Posted by DKA-78
Is there something I am missing about smaller brakes providing better stopping distance? I thought it was larger brakes that stopped better.
No you aren't missing anything. Usually bigger brakes provide better distance, but not in this case.

Don't know if it's due to the weight difference between the Ram/Tundra Or exactly what the case may be, but this is what the report stated, just going off what they said.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #13  
DKA-78's Avatar
DKA-78
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by V8EXPLR
No you aren't missing anything. Usually bigger brakes provide better distance, but not in this case.

Don't know if it's due to the weight difference between the Ram/Tundra Or exactly what the case may be, but this is what the report stated, just going off what they said.

OK, I went back and read the report again, I missed a lot of pieces through out due to our puppy running around and harassing one of our cats.


it's definitely quite a truck and I would not mind having it in my driveway, if the price was right.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #14  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Honestly the new Dodge is a nice looking truck, better than the tundra and GM for shure maybe even better looking than the F-150.

Dodge probably went with a larger caliper with more pistons.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #15  
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by DKA-78
Is there something I am missing about smaller brakes providing better stopping distance? I thought it was larger brakes that stopped better.
Not always the case. In a comparison, if both vehicles stop hard enough for ABS activation then the deciding factor is the tires.

Vehicle weight plays a large role, as well.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE