Notices

300/6 performance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 03:00 AM
  #16  
tlk50's Avatar
tlk50
Elder User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Wasilla, AK
If you really want a Bad 300 six!

If you really want a Bad 300 Six-banger check out this before you go to far: www.cliffordperformance.net The cost for a pavement smoking, fire breathing 300 six might just give you sticker shock. The cost effectiveness is in, like the guy's said, a small block. A 351W can be made to be healthy pretty cheaply and there are lots of vendors that handle the parts. I have a 351W 4V with RV cam and a C4 in a 67 F100 2WD. If I stay out of the 4 barrel and drive normal I get about 17 mpg. When I listen to ZZ Top it drops to about 12 mpg. Just some thoughts of my own? What ever you personally want to do is fine. Just make it happen and enjoy it!!
Tim
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #17  
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 4
From: Almost Heaven
Originally Posted by jgheid
My stock 78 f350 with the 400m and a fresh tune up got 13.8 mpg highway at 65-70 mph.
my truck now has a stock 390 FE and over the last 400 miles it got 12.6 including alot of city driving.
I'v never had a 300 I6 what is it's mpg like.
Wow. I was expecting better than that! But those are big motors.

Not bad if you set it up right. A lot of guys claim 15 city / 18 highway, which isn't bad for a flying brick. Mine drinks gasoline like it's free. I think there may be something wrong with it. I've been throwing money at it but I'm about done. I expected better MPG than what I'm getting with the new tires and gears.
I think my auto tranny is killing it. That would explain the horrible in-town mileage but my highway seems to be right on the money.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #18  
jgheid's Avatar
jgheid
New User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Washington
that was also hauling biulding materials around and dump runs in all kinds of driving conditions, stop and go trafic, city, cruzing speed, and washington isn't getting any flater. during this time I was doing testing how the truck ran at differant timming settings, so there was a lot of WOT time.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 02:20 PM
  #19  
80broncoman's Avatar
80broncoman
Laughing Gas
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: southeren Oh
My 400 uses about 25% more fuel than the 300 I owned.
I used to get a best of 20mpg in my 95 300 pickup. My 400 gets a best of 15mpg.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #20  
RedWing58's Avatar
RedWing58
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Woodland
mine gets about 21-22 highway and about 16-17 city, but i use 92 octane fuel. i dont know how much of a difference that makes but it seems to get better gas milage than when i used 87 and it has more power.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #21  
F-150battlemaster's Avatar
F-150battlemaster
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Got a cold air intake with a 2.5in cat back and a magnaflow muffler. While I was at it I told em to cut the hump off and now the exhaust exits just forward of the tire. Put a hotter MSD coil and a K&N on it to finish it off. Not much of an improvement but instead of merging onto the highway at 52mph I merge at 60mph.

QFE for this motor is not a speed demon. However, if you feel the need to rip the titanic off the ocean floor and haul it to NY. Then this is probably the motor to do it with.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #22  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Originally Posted by tlk50
If you really want a Bad 300 Six-banger check out this before you go to far: www.cliffordperformance.net The cost for a pavement smoking, fire breathing 300 six might just give you sticker shock.
Clifford sucks sweaty monkey *****. They'll break it off in your @ss after they wrap it with dynamite and broken glass. Then they'll light the fuse and run away so they don't have to help out when your ***** blows up.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 05:59 PM
  #23  
tlk50's Avatar
tlk50
Elder User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Wasilla, AK
Silver Streak

Sounds like you had a bad experiance with Clifford? I'm not pushing Cliffords products I just wanted to give the guy a round-a-bout cost of hot rodding a six-banger. I personally have only used their intakes, headers, and some marine grade rods for a cirlce tracker I built a few years ago. They worked fine for that purpose without any failures.
Tim

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #24  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Search this forum and you will find that the majority wouldn't **** on Clifford if it was on fire. They are jerks and their products are at best second rate leftovers from when they were on the cutting edge about 30 years ago.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #25  
Blue Bomber's Avatar
Blue Bomber
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 679
Likes: 1
From: Memphis, TN
you pretty much "pay to play" with these motors. they are not cheap when it comes to going fast, and forced induction is the best way to go. however, that being said, the stock internals will not hold up to much. you can go ahead and add forged pistons and rods to your price est. if you want to go fast with a 300, put it in a really small car. you will have much more fun and probably not spend half as much. unless you cant weld. then i would go with a V8.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #26  
Silver Streak's Avatar
Silver Streak
Postmaster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 3
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Factory rods are forged.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #27  
Blue Bomber's Avatar
Blue Bomber
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 679
Likes: 1
From: Memphis, TN
oopps, sorry.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #28  
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 4
From: Almost Heaven
Originally Posted by Blue Bomber
you pretty much "pay to play" with these motors. they are not cheap when it comes to going fast, and forced induction is the best way to go. however, that being said, the stock internals will not hold up to much. you can go ahead and add forged pistons and rods to your price est. if you want to go fast with a 300, put it in a really small car. you will have much more fun and probably not spend half as much. unless you cant weld. then i would go with a V8.
300 six in a single cab Ranger. Put a heavy rear bumper on it for better balance, and wallah. It should be pretty quick, eh?
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #29  
Blue Bomber's Avatar
Blue Bomber
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 679
Likes: 1
From: Memphis, TN
where does the back half of the motor go?
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #30  
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 4
From: Almost Heaven
Originally Posted by Blue Bomber
where does the back half of the motor go?
You put the motor in the bed.

I wonder if someone did put a 300 in the bed of a Ranger, if when they stomp on it they could lift the front end of the Ranger off the ground?? That would be a really short drive shaft. I bet it's possible.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE