When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
A long while ago, when backing up, I got in the habit of dropping the tranny into neutral about the same time I hit the brakes to stop and start forward again. I figured if I'm going to be trying to stop the truck from heading in that direction, why would I want to keep power applied? I'm going to be shifting to forward in a second anyway.
Now I find myself dropping the tranny into neutral at stop lights, then back into drive when the light turns green. Same thinking - why would I want to be applying power to move when I'm trying to stay still?
So the question is (or "are" I guess): Does this save any fuel? Is it easier on the brakes? Does shifting in and out of gear like this introduce extra wear in the transmission or driveline?
I've been told that shifting into neutral helps when stopping on slippery surfaces, but have never tried it. A friend of mine that has a trans temp gauge said that when he leaves it in gear the temp goes up, but if he puts it in neutral it doesn't. So if I get stuck by a train or some fairly long stop I put mine in neutral. I don't think that it is good to shift while the vehicle is moving though, but that is just a opinion.
It doesn't save any gas, even when coasting downhill. When I drive automatics (rarely now) I'll put it in park if I'm going to be stopped for any period of time, but at stoplights and the like, its not worth the effort.
Since it is releasing all the bands and clutches when you put it in neutral or park, there's no problem with shifting it with the vehicle moving. Its probably not a good idea to get into the habit of shifting back and forth between gears unless it has an auto-stick function just because of the extra wear to the clutch packs, but I think the old tales about not shifting gears in an automatic in a moving vehicle is mainly an old wive's tale.
I know in the manual for my 90 Bronco it says to shift to nuetral at stops to let the "engine Idle Higher" so it must not be that much wear on a tranny.
you are not saving any gas, maybe using more becasue the engin can idle at a higher RPM...the breaks dont wear any when they are stoped, you usethng to stop and once the break is not turning it is not being worn, even if you have your foot on the break. to me more shifting = more wear = shorter trans life. but if you wanted to save fuel the only way you might save a little if if when you start to break shift into N and then the RPMs will drop sooner but even then its not really worth the efort...just one more mans opinion....
I don't think there's any doubt it saves *some* gas, but most likely not enough to make it worth while, maybe not enough even measure without some pretty precise equipment. For instance, oldgoats buddy with the trans temp gauge - the tranny heats up when left in gear. That heat comes from somewhere - from fuel. You won't wear your brakes out when stopped in gear, but again, the energy has to go somewhere. I doubt the engine runs cooler when stopped in gear, it'll probably get hotter. but that's, most likely due to less heat transfer via the cooling system due to slower rpms.
I'm not thinking this is the answer to the energy crisis or anything, just was sitting there (at a light, in neutral) thinking about it...
Recently got a ScanGuageII. It will tell you how much fuel it calculates you use at any moment in time.
When I heard an advertisement from Honda, I believe, about their transmission that shifts itself into neutral at stops, I monitored fuel g.p.m.'s when stopped, both in drive and neutral. Guage says engine uses less fuel in neutral.
Also monitored going downhill, both in drive and neutral. Neutral uses less fuel as well.
I'm just reporting what the ScanGuageII indicated.
Recently got a ScanGuageII. It will tell you how much fuel it calculates you use at any moment in time.
When I heard an advertisement from Honda, I believe, about their transmission that shifts itself into neutral at stops, I monitored fuel g.p.m.'s when stopped, both in drive and neutral. Guage says engine uses less fuel in neutral.
Also monitored going downhill, both in drive and neutral. Neutral uses less fuel as well.
I'm just reporting what the ScanGuageII indicated.
I was thinking about the coasting thing as well. Most computer controlled EFI systems will allow no fuel at all for a closed throttle condition, as long as the engine is above about 1500 rpm. So coasting down a hill in neutral (with the engine at idle, using fuel) *might* use more fuel than if you left it in gear AND the engine rpm stayed above the cutoff.
I'm sure we're talking very minute amounts of difference here, but it's interesting to think about.. (at least to me it is!)
I second the previous poster about coasting in neutral. For some time now, cars have been designed to cut off fuel completely when coasting.
I read this a while back in Popular Mechanics, and brought it up here to see if it was the real deal. Answers were pretty much 'where have you been -- this is old news'. The reason that they went to that system was to up mileage.
I don't know how much you might save by popping it into N at a stoplight, but I wouldn't do it unless I had a nice slow idle. Hate it when you hear a thunk when you drop it in gear.
one thing to consider about neutral dropping when going downhill.
you have no control of the driving force with the vehicle in neutral, and in many states, it is illegal.
if you are in an accident, and the L.E.O. can prove you were in neutral, it is considered a your fault accident even if you were an innocent bystander.
and you very well may get a ticket for it too.
one thing to consider about neutral dropping when going downhill.
you have no control of the driving force with the vehicle in neutral, and in many states, it is illegal.
if you are in an accident, and the L.E.O. can prove you were in neutral, it is considered a your fault accident even if you were an innocent bystander.
and you very well may get a ticket for it too.
I don't believe this applies to passenger vehicles, just commercial. They have all kinds of extra restrictions - things like it's illegal to shift gears going over a RR crossing..
Anyone remember the old Saab 2 cycles? They had a free-wheeling clutch, When you went downhill if the engine started braking the clutch would effectively release allowing the vehicle to roll freely.
And as I tried to state in my previous post, you might actually be using MORE fuel with the computer controlled EFI if you're coasting down a hill in neutral. The computer will shut off fuel when you're coasting, but ONLY when the engine rpm is above a certain point. If it shut off the fuel when the engine was in neutral, the engine (it's at idle, remember) would die.
I don't believe this applies to passenger vehicles, just commercial. They have all kinds of extra restrictions - things like it's illegal to shift gears going over a RR crossing...
well, i know for a fact it applies to passenger vehicles in New Jersey.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.