Notices
6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

Ford Rethinks Big Block V8s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 07:37 AM
  #76  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 2000BLK54
Go to the library and read a book already. I've quoted enough sources and you just don't seem to get it. It is not magic, it is a fundamental aspect of thermo- and fluid dynamics. Heat is part of the energy transfer, not just some by-product of a process you don't really understand.
Again, the temperature difference between input and output side of the exhaust turbine is a BYPRODUCT of the reduced pressure after the turbine. Keeping as much heat in the exhaust BEFORE the turbine is a good thing because it keeps the pressure up.

Cart-before-the-horse sort of thing.

The heat is not producing the energy. It's HELPFUL, and loss of heat will HURT the turbo in terms of power, but the heat itself is NOT what's causing the turbo to spin.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #77  
DanielC's Avatar
DanielC
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
I am going to step into this again, and try to bring some consensus.
A few basic premises.
1. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. We are not talking about anything nuclear here.
2. About a third to a half of the total chemical energy in a motor vehicle fuel just goes out the exhaust pipe.
3. Gas laws:
"The ideal gas law can be stated as a formula, pV = nRT, where p stands for pressure, V for volume, n for number of moles, and T for temperature. R is known as the universal gas constant, a figure equal to 0.0821 atm · liter/mole · K. (Like most terms in physics, this one is best expressed in metric rather than English units.)"
This was copied from this site: gas laws: Definition from Answers.com

Simply put, you cannot change the temperature of a gas without changing the pressure, if you hold the volume the same. If you allow one thing (pressure, temperature, or volume) to change, at least one other thing has to change.

You can measure the temperature, or the pressure on both the engine side and the outlet side of a turbocharger exhaust side turbine, and both the pressure AND the temperature will be lower, and the gas has expanded in volume.

That pressure and temperature loss is an indication that the gas on the outlet side of the turbine has less energy than it did before it went through the turbine. The turbocharger turbine, by controlling the expansion of the gas has captured some of that energy that is in the exhaust gas. This is energy that is wasted on a non turbocharged engine.

Once this energy is captured from the hot exhaust, it can be used to do something useful, like partially compressing the air on the intake side of the cylinder. If the air is partially compressed when it goes into the cylinder, you can lower the compression ratio in the cylinder, and reduce the amount of energy each piston absorbs from the flywheel to compress the gas in the first place.

This is where a well designed turbocharger system on an internal combustion engine can result in fuel economy gains, or power gains.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #78  
2000BLK54's Avatar
2000BLK54
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 3
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by BURNSTOUGHFORD
YES... thermo, fluid dynamics, two areas im well versed in..

You last few posts already gave the lie here buddy. This is quite a bit beyond the scope of the elementary classes you have taken so far.



Originally Posted by krewat
Again, the temperature difference between input and output side of the exhaust turbine is a BYPRODUCT of the reduced pressure after the turbine. Keeping as much heat in the exhaust BEFORE the turbine is a good thing because it keeps the pressure up.

Cart-before-the-horse sort of thing.

The heat is not producing the energy. It's HELPFUL, and loss of heat will HURT the turbo in terms of power, but the heat itself is NOT what's causing the turbo to spin.

Let's make this simple for you. Engineers measure performance of the turbine and compressor separately using a calibrated test engine. They KNOW all of the inputs and by measuring the compressor performance they know the output. They find that after taking all the losses into account that just using the PRESSURE differential there is not enough energy to account for the output at the compressor side. So genius, explain where the energy is coming from because, as the other poster just so succinctly put it, energy cannot be created or destroyed in this process.


Oh, and this goes FAR beyond the scope of the ideal gas law.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #79  
meanv10's Avatar
meanv10
Elder User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 699
Likes: 1
You just have a problem admitting when your wrong dont you. lol
Takes a big man dosnt it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #80  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 2000BLK54
They find that after taking all the losses into account that just using the PRESSURE differential there is not enough energy to account for the output at the compressor side.
Can you provide links to actual research data? I would be very interested in reading it. And by the way, the pressure difference between input and output sides of the exhaust turbine is responsible for the temperature difference, I didn't say it's the only source of mechanical energy.

The only things I can find about this subject specifically state only about 1/3rd of the "heat energy" that is wasted out the exhaust is then turned into mechanical energy.

And by "heat energy" they mean the flow/pressure of exhaust gases as a result of internal combustion, not that the heat itself is utilized as energy.

I still think semantics is the issue here, not that the heat itself is being used to produce mechanical energy (torque) at the turbo shaft but that you're reading more into the process than what really exists.
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #81  
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by 2000BLK54
You last few posts already gave the lie here buddy. This is quite a bit beyond the scope of the elementary classes you have taken so far.
Im a little past elementary class's i think you need to go back to school take a couple class's

mass flow rate is what drives the majority of a turbo, simple as that, what little expansion that happens doesn't effect the turbo nearly as much as the flow rate of gas's going through.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #82  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Let's start over with something basic.

What's moving the exhaust turbine side of the turbo is individual molecules of exhaust gas imparting kinetic energy to the impeller. Period.

Heat is the random vibration of molecules(atoms) moving in all directions at once (or at least, they all cancel each other out). Otherwise, the desk I'm leaning on would move. There is no vector.

Of course, the TEMPERATURE of the exhaust gases is important to keep the pressure up on the input side of the turbine.

But heat is not doing the work, the flow is doing the work.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #83  
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
thats why i said mass flow rate does the work. anyways i think we are just beating our heads against a wall with him.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #84  
ddl_cgy's Avatar
ddl_cgy
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BURNSTOUGHFORD
thats why i said mass flow rate does the work. anyways i think we are just beating our heads against a wall with him.
The exhaust gas before the turbocharger has a certain internal energy (enthalpy) at that pressure and temperature. After the exhaust turbine the exhaust gas is now at a different lower pressure and temperature; this corresponds to a different enthalpy.

This reduction in enthalpy (reduction of exhaust gas internal energy) can produce a certain amount of ideal work; the useful work is this maximum ideal amount times the efficiency of the exhaust turbine process.

The larger the drop in temperature and pressure the larger the enthalpy change (reduction) one gets.

This amount of work (reduction in enthalpy is given as BTU/lb mass) times the mass flow (lb mass/sec) gives one the amount of power (BTU/sec, 0.71 BTU/sec = 1 HP) that the exhaust turbine can produce. Likewise this is the amount of work less friction losses turning the turbine shaft that goes into the compressor side which times the compressor efficiency gives the actual work done compressing the air (raising its temperature and pressure from ambient).

If mass flow alone was to provide the turbocharger work then what gives us the mass flow?

When the exhaust valve opens the upstroke of the piston on the exhaust stroke helps to push the exhaust out (providing the mass flow) plus there is a slightly higher pressure in the cylinder from combustion than on the other side the exhaust valve. If there was no change in energy of the exhaust gas then the energy to turn the turbocharger would have to come from the useful work produced by the other cylinders thus robbing the engine of power (other cylinders on their power stroke turn the crankshaft which pushes up the piston for the cylinder on the exhaust stroke).

That is why turbochargers are used instead of superchargers; the turbocharger doesn't have as much parasitic loss (slight increase in exhaust backpressure) versus a supercharger (which is belt driven off of the crankshaft directly robbing useful power). Of course superchargers have their advantages as well.

DDL

p.s. I'm a senior mechanical engineer who has worked on developing industrial natural gas engine air/fuel ratio control for both natural aspirated and turbocharged engines. I hope I laid out my explanation in an easy to follow manner. Sorry for the wordiness!
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #85  
Econoline 150's Avatar
Econoline 150
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 566
Likes: 1
Fords mistake was when they made the 4.6 and 5.4 that they designed it so they couldnt use larger bores. If they had they could go another 20-30 cubes more easily without going to a newer V8 design instead of explanding theexisting one using less new tooling.
But, even if they could use a larger bore on the existing 5.4, they might not have expanded it anyway.

Im late on this conversation, but thats my .02
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 08:35 AM
  #86  
ddl_cgy's Avatar
ddl_cgy
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Exhaust heat is important as it helps keep the pressure of the gas up plus it is inidicative of the internal energy of the exhaust gas. This energy is from the work put into the compression stroke and the exothermal (heat releasing) combustion process. The higher the temperature and pressure of the exhaust gas above atmospheric the more energy the gas has available to do work in an expansion down to atmospheric pressure.

If the exhaust gas loses temperature in the exhaust system prior to the turbocharger then its pressure and internal energy will go down leaving less energy available to produce work in the exhaust turbine. Cooling a constant volume of gas reduces its pressure so this is to be avoided if possible.

That is why on a turbocharged engine the exhaust inlet to the turbine is usually insulated in order to retain as much heat (and thus pressure) in the "constant volume" exhaust manifold.

The exhaust turbine is turned by the impulse of the exhaust gas striking the turbine blades and the reaction force of the gas changing direction.

The pressure differential between the cylinder and the outlet of the turbine is what gives the gas velocity; the more the differential the more velocity the gas can achieve and thus impart more energy into the turbine wheel.

The gas leaving the exhaust turbine is hotter than atmospheric and has to be at a higher pressure than atmospheric in order to get through the rest of the exhaust system downstream of the turbine outlet. This is where a lower restriction exhaust system would help so that the turbine could have a larger pressure drop in it (getting closer to atmospheric pressure) and thus produce more power which could be used by the compressor section with less pressure required to exhaust the gas through the remainder of the exhaust system.

The larger the heat drop going through the exhaust turbine (assuming no heat transfer to the turbine) is indicative of more produced work. However the work produced is actually a result of the pressure expansion of the gas in the exhaust turbine which is accompanied by the drop in temperature.

Dropping heat at constant pressure does no useful work unless this heat is transferred to another fluid (or heat engine) which can be used to produce useful work (e.g. exhaust heat boils water into steam which is then used to drive a small steam turbine).

DDL
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 12:45 PM
  #87  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
You can come up with all the fancy explanations for the process, but it comes down to this:


Originally Posted by krewat
What's moving the exhaust turbine side of the turbo is individual molecules of exhaust gas imparting kinetic energy to the impeller. Period.

The amount of work transferred, the speed of the molecules, the heat involved, drop in pressure, everything you can point out, fine.

However, the actual work being done is mechanical work.

Ever see one of these:

Crookes radiometer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I mean, turbo impellers aren't painted a different color on one side versus the other, right?

In other words, there is no mechanism where by "heat" is used as a DIRECT energy source.

There is pure mechanical kinetic energy being used to move the turbine. Period.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #88  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Originally Posted by Econoline 150
Fords mistake was when they made the 4.6 and 5.4 that they designed it so they couldnt use larger bores. If they had they could go another 20-30 cubes more easily without going to a newer V8 design instead of explanding theexisting one using less new tooling.
But, even if they could use a larger bore on the existing 5.4, they might not have expanded it anyway.

Im late on this conversation, but thats my .02
Increase the stroke, increase the CI.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #89  
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by ddl_cgy
The exhaust gas before the turbocharger has a certain internal energy (enthalpy) at that pressure and temperature. After the exhaust turbine the exhaust gas is now at a different lower pressure and temperature; this corresponds to a different enthalpy.

This reduction in enthalpy (reduction of exhaust gas internal energy) can produce a certain amount of ideal work; the useful work is this maximum ideal amount times the efficiency of the exhaust turbine process.

The larger the drop in temperature and pressure the larger the enthalpy change (reduction) one gets.

This amount of work (reduction in enthalpy is given as BTU/lb mass) times the mass flow (lb mass/sec) gives one the amount of power (BTU/sec, 0.71 BTU/sec = 1 HP) that the exhaust turbine can produce. Likewise this is the amount of work less friction losses turning the turbine shaft that goes into the compressor side which times the compressor efficiency gives the actual work done compressing the air (raising its temperature and pressure from ambient).

If mass flow alone was to provide the turbocharger work then what gives us the mass flow?

When the exhaust valve opens the upstroke of the piston on the exhaust stroke helps to push the exhaust out (providing the mass flow) plus there is a slightly higher pressure in the cylinder from combustion than on the other side the exhaust valve. If there was no change in energy of the exhaust gas then the energy to turn the turbocharger would have to come from the useful work produced by the other cylinders thus robbing the engine of power (other cylinders on their power stroke turn the crankshaft which pushes up the piston for the cylinder on the exhaust stroke).

That is why turbochargers are used instead of superchargers; the turbocharger doesn't have as much parasitic loss (slight increase in exhaust backpressure) versus a supercharger (which is belt driven off of the crankshaft directly robbing useful power). Of course superchargers have their advantages as well.

DDL

p.s. I'm a senior mechanical engineer who has worked on developing industrial natural gas engine air/fuel ratio control for both natural aspirated and turbocharged engines. I hope I laid out my explanation in an easy to follow manner. Sorry for the wordiness!
I completely agree. It comes from the mass of air being pushed out of the engine. That's what i have been trying to say. The guys earlier where trying to say it was work done by gas expansion from heat after the engine. There is very little work dont from the expansion from heat since the air is cooling as soon as it leaves the engine. For the most part.

The energy is a result of the pressure ratio across the turbo (i.e. the ratio of the pressure in the exhaust manifold/ambient pressure). The mass of air flow is also a factor but basically the same air following into the turbo is flowing out of the turbo
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #90  
wizardsr's Avatar
wizardsr
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 713
Likes: 5
From: Minneapolis, MN
Ok, now that I've sifted through a million off topic posts about how turbos work when it doesn't even relate to the 6.2...

The real question is, will I be able to buy a 2010 F350 with a V10, or am I going to be stuck with a torque deficient 6.2?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE