2011 F100
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Saratoga USA
freirefishing- I just checked Ford's Website, and the 2008 Sport Trac does indeed have independent rear suspension. That leads me to suspect the chassis is from the current Explorer, not the Ranger, which still has the live axle.
Moderator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 1,231
From: San Antonio, TX
The 2nd gen SportTrac is much larger than the 1st gen. It is built on a modified version of the current Explorer chassis with a. I saw one parked next to an F150 the other day.
The SportTrac is almost as long as the F150, a little shorter and a little narrower. It ca be had with a V6 or V8. If they made a 5.5 ft bed for it, it would be as long as an F150 super cab. An odd vehicle that doesn't represent a significant fuel milage savings for it's shortcomings. It will fit in most garages and parking spaces though.
The SportTrac is almost as long as the F150, a little shorter and a little narrower. It ca be had with a V6 or V8. If they made a 5.5 ft bed for it, it would be as long as an F150 super cab. An odd vehicle that doesn't represent a significant fuel milage savings for it's shortcomings. It will fit in most garages and parking spaces though.
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 1
From: Sweetwater Texas
I agree Ford should bring the F100 back, I just recently bought a 1980 F100 because I needed a fullsize but don't want to pay the gas bill of a big fullsize and I am very impressed that a fullsize truck can get 18-19 mpg.
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 18
From: Enjoying the real world.
Honestly Ken I've never really understood the common trend of dropping manual transmissions among full sized trucks. I'm pretty sure you have a better understanding of the auto industry then I do, but to me it would seem like Ford would want to sell every truck they possibly could.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't the provisions for producing a manual trans put in place a long time ago? What I mean is the equipment/assembly line for the manual trans were put in place in the Ford factories many years ago, correct?
I'm also assuming that from the purchase cost of a new vehicle a small percentage of that covers the transmission.
I understand that most common folks have no use for a manual trans. But when the automatic trans was introduced no one had any use for them either, so they were offered as an option for those few folks who wanted one. As odd as it may seem to me perhaps an automatic could be offered as the standard trans with a manual as a option. I've heard plenty of people on FTE voice their opinion in favor of a manual trans, Ford can't tell me there wouldn't be a market for one. A small market sure but the demand hasn't completely faded away yet.
New User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Ken,
Could you email me?
Thanks
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 1
From: Edgerton, WI
Ive personally always liked the Explorer Sport-Trac and would seriously consider one, but like you said, why buy one of those when you could buy an F-150 for pretty much the same amount of money.
Thread Starter
|
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
I think the Explorer Sport Trac is targeted at a different segment than the F150.
Think of it more as a Ridgeline/Avalanche competitor. It has a reduced payload etc. over an F150, but also comes with greater comfort, reduced NVH, better fuel mileage etc.
And if I am not mistaken, it is based on the Explorer not the Ranger. Although I can't recall for certain (I do know it definiately uses the Explorer suspension)
The F150 is more designed for a vehicle that is more "utilitarian". I also think with the current oil prices, the market the Explorer Sport Trac is in will be affected much more substantially than that of the F150.
Think of it more as a Ridgeline/Avalanche competitor. It has a reduced payload etc. over an F150, but also comes with greater comfort, reduced NVH, better fuel mileage etc.
And if I am not mistaken, it is based on the Explorer not the Ranger. Although I can't recall for certain (I do know it definiately uses the Explorer suspension)
The F150 is more designed for a vehicle that is more "utilitarian". I also think with the current oil prices, the market the Explorer Sport Trac is in will be affected much more substantially than that of the F150.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
Not only is the F-100 comming out, there will also be a new compact ranger p/u in 2012. It's being designed in austraila as we speak as a world truck. Just one ranger for every country, instead of different rangers for different countries like they have now. Main engine is to be a 4 cylinder with mpg at a round 30. There will also be a 4x4 4 cylinder, turbo's will more than likely be an option as well.
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern Indiana
Not only is the F-100 comming out, there will also be a new compact ranger p/u in 2012. It's being designed in austraila as we speak as a world truck. Just one ranger for every country, instead of different rangers for different countries like they have now. Main engine is to be a 4 cylinder with mpg at a round 30. There will also be a 4x4 4 cylinder, turbo's will more than likely be an option as well.
Junior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
its not like ford doesnt have any manual trannys that can take a V6 or a small V8. the M5OD-R2 is/was used with a 302 and later the 4.6 (which for 2003 i believe was rated @ 293 lb/ft, which is enough for a mid-size truck).
with those new fuel-efficiency requirements, a more efficient transmission is definately something that will help.
hopefully at least they will offer it with the V6, and if it follows the dakotas layout, the V8 will only be offered with 6 speeds of slushiness bull****
with those new fuel-efficiency requirements, a more efficient transmission is definately something that will help.
hopefully at least they will offer it with the V6, and if it follows the dakotas layout, the V8 will only be offered with 6 speeds of slushiness bull****
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 1
From: Edgerton, WI
its not like ford doesnt have any manual trannys that can take a V6 or a small V8. the M5OD-R2 is/was used with a 302 and later the 4.6 (which for 2003 i believe was rated @ 293 lb/ft, which is enough for a mid-size truck).
with those new fuel-efficiency requirements, a more efficient transmission is definately something that will help.
hopefully at least they will offer it with the V6, and if it follows the dakotas layout, the V8 will only be offered with 6 speeds of slushiness bull****
with those new fuel-efficiency requirements, a more efficient transmission is definately something that will help.
hopefully at least they will offer it with the V6, and if it follows the dakotas layout, the V8 will only be offered with 6 speeds of slushiness bull****
There will always be people who prefer manual transmissions, but if only 10% of people buy a model with a manual transmission, for Ford it doesnt make sense from a business standpoint to continue offering manual trannys.
Personally, I can see having a manual tranny in a sportscar, but not in a truck. For plowing snow, doing slowspeed off-roading or for backing up a trailer, automatic is the only way to go.
New User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Not to dampen the moistened spirit, but NO F100 could ever match the overall appeal and coolness of this:
I mean, this is arguably the coolest truck with the greatest possibilities...
For me, it just doesn't get any better than this...
So if they're going to revamp the name, it had better be an incredible offering that is capable of living up to the name F100. I'd much rather remember the F100 for how cool it was than as some mini pickup that doesn't live up to the name.....
I mean, this is arguably the coolest truck with the greatest possibilities...
For me, it just doesn't get any better than this...
So if they're going to revamp the name, it had better be an incredible offering that is capable of living up to the name F100. I'd much rather remember the F100 for how cool it was than as some mini pickup that doesn't live up to the name.....