Notices

MSD or Jacobs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 11:52 AM
  #1  
BigBronco93's Avatar
BigBronco93
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
MSD or Jacobs?

Well yet another question... I'm definatly going to pick up a new ignition kit soon... so what do you think about the MSD 6-Offroad and the Jacobs Off-Road Ultra Team?
Is one better then the other? anyone have one? did they help anything?

And whats the deal with the "uphill" part of the Jacobs kit?

also do I get it right when I see that these kits use the original distributor.

Yet again... let me know.

*SMC

------------
1993 Ford Bronco XLT
302 EFI, No Modifications yet.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2001 | 11:41 AM
  #2  
Billyk1's Avatar
Billyk1
New User
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Perkasie PA
MSD or Jacobs?

I put a MSD 6A on my 89 F150 302 along with an Accel coil. I did gain a little in the mileage department and when pulling up hill, it didn't seem to load up as much. The one thing I will caution is to make sure that your wires are in good shape and it wouldn't hurt to have 8.8 or 9 mm wires.


 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2001 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 3
MSD or Jacobs?

I bought a Jacobs Pro Street system for my F350 460. Worse mileage and no power increase. Truck now runs stock ignition and Jacobs is on the shelf.

Nathan
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2001 | 12:04 PM
  #4  
BigBronco93's Avatar
BigBronco93
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
MSD or Jacobs?

ouch.... thats not good... has anyone else had similar problem with the jacobs? or what about has anyone else had a good time with the MSD??


*SMC

------------
1993 Ford Bronco XLT
302 EFI, No Modifications yet.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2001 | 04:19 PM
  #5  
bsprowl's Avatar
bsprowl
Tuned
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Deatsville, AL
MSD or Jacobs?

Never heard of anybody that wasn't happy with an MSD. Been using there parts since the '70s.

Bob
'66 7 Litre, top loader, 3.25 Traction-lock, Sidewinder Intake, SCJ Exhaust
'88 F150 LWB 4x2, XLT Lariat, 302, 5 speed, 3.08
'99 Ranger, 4x2, 3.0, 5 speed, 3.73 posi



 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2001 | 08:25 PM
  #6  
Boss_358's Avatar
Boss_358
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
From: Benton County, MN
Club FTE Silver Member

MSD or Jacobs?

I run a jacobs in my 78 F-150 with the 351 cleveland 4V .040 over trw flattops with a comp cams magnum 280H and crane energizer 1:73 roller rockers topped off with a performer intake with a 750 holley. As you can see I am not going for the mileage aspect of things. But the engine does perform considerably well with this ignition set up. These are very tricky sysems but I think Nathan had a problem becuase he was running a pro street system which is probably not for mileage gain but for highly modified racing engines, hence PRO STREET.
They have differen't systems for different applications. The system I am running was supposed to be for a mid 80's bronco with a duraspark II and 351 h.o. The guy never had it installed due to selling the bronco so he never had an opinion. The only bad experience I had was we could not get the system to work with my mallory distributor. But I think we fried the module out in it crossing some wires so I think that was my own fualt. Otherwise it performs pretty good.

People who say it can't be done should not interrupt the person doing it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 07:50 AM
  #7  
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 3
MSD or Jacobs?

Jacobs adds claimed a 20 HP increase and 1-2 MPG for my application, I saw neither. Jacobs salesman said the gains would be more noticable on my 79 351M. Installed it on that truck with the same results as the 460, NOTHING! Also, if the coil got the slightest bit damp, engines no start!

Go with the MSD!

Nathan
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 08:40 AM
  #8  
slimersoup's Avatar
slimersoup
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
MSD or Jacobs?

Heard of lots of people having quality control issues with the Jacobs units. Not really built to hold up apparently. Although I did fry a MSD 6AL in 12,000 miles, this was on a GM HEI on a mild Pontiac 400. So I swapped back in the HEI module and kept going down the road, too lazy to send it in for warranty yet. Probably because there was no performance difference between the 6AL and the HEI modules. Not sure how it compares to the Ford module though.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 11:39 AM
  #9  
Boss_358's Avatar
Boss_358
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
From: Benton County, MN
Club FTE Silver Member

MSD or Jacobs?

[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 12-Aug-01 AT 12:40 PM (EST)[/font][p]I guess the real test will be when I go to move the truck from its resting place where it has been sitting for a while. I know the biggest problems we had with the jacobs was getting everything hooked up. These units are extremely cunfusing and I think can be damaged easily. It took us a few calls to their tech line with no results so finally we figured it out ourselves. There directions might as well have been in japaneese. But otherwise it seems to work. How well over any other ignition I do not know since this is the only set up I have had besides the stock duraspark with my old engine. I also stopped beleiving what salesmen say becuase I think all of them will say or do anything to make you buy something. Like our experience last night when we were looking at a $2000 couch. Salesmen came out of nowhere talking all of his usual jive trying to strike a deal. I know the shop I used to work for sends all of their salesmen to a special salesmen bootcamp, if you might call it. Every place must do this, they all seem to have the same sly and annoying routine. One thing is for sure, the more someone tells me to use something, the less I want to use it. If I have to buy another ignition in which I will sometime, I think I am going to give the Holley system a try. Or go with a Mallory so I know something will work with that darn distributor.

People who say it can't be done should not interrupt the person doing it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 03:38 PM
  #10  
dinosaurfan's Avatar
dinosaurfan
Cargo Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,931
Likes: 12
From: SW Michigan
MSD or Jacobs?

I have the Jacobs stuff and I love it. That said, I had points before and have a big intake, ported heads, headers and a bigger cam. I run a 080 gap and have no hard starts or misfires ever. My 4.56 gears seee to it that mileage is still bad. I did not purchase Jacobs until after reading his book on ignitions and learning a lot. If you are hoping for a big power increase on a stock engine, forget it. A stock engine will see no help from a more powerful ignition, it just doesn't need it. Either the flame is getting lit or it is not, if your stock ignition is doing the job, aftermarket ignition is a waste of money. DF
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2001 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
BigBronco93's Avatar
BigBronco93
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
MSD or Jacobs?

Thank you guys all so much... I appreciate the replies... I'm definatly gonna look at the MSD, but from what I can see it doesn't seem to help stock motors... so I'll drio the ignition system a bit lower on my list of mods... its looking like the dual exhaust, K&N, and possibly a new throttle body whould be first.

If anyone has some more comments... please.. let me know.

*SMC

------------
1993 Ford Bronco XLT
302 EFI, No Modifications yet.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 06:36 AM
  #12  
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 3
MSD or Jacobs?

I have the Jacobs stuff and I love it. That said, I had points before and have a big intake, ported heads, headers and a bigger cam. I run a 080 gap and have no hard starts or misfires ever. My 4.56 gears seee to it that mileage is still bad. I did not purchase Jacobs until after reading his book on ignitions and learning a lot. If you are hoping for a big power increase on a stock engine, forget it. A stock engine will see no help from a more powerful ignition, it just doesn't need it. Either the flame is getting lit or it is not, if your stock ignition is doing the job, aftermarket ignition is a waste of money. DF
Then why do they claim all of these improvements to "stock" engines in their adds and sales "pitch". I spent the money on the system because with their claims it would have paid for itself in short order. Lesson learned

Nathan

 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2001 | 07:37 AM
  #13  
loudfords's Avatar
loudfords
FTE Chapter Leader
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Beachville, Ontario
Club FTE Silver Member

MSD or Jacobs?

 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
24 Carat
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
Jan 28, 2016 11:57 PM
evans.w.jacob
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Sep 22, 2011 09:52 AM
53wa2fl
Alternative Fuels, Hybrids & Mileage
16
Oct 15, 2005 03:50 PM
SBV1
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
1
Feb 11, 2002 10:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE