When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I spend a lot off time behind the wheel and I get to thinking about stuff...
With electronic ignition, fuel injection, crank position sensors and engine management computers, shouldn't we be able to start an engine just by injecting fuel into the proper cylinders and fire the sparkplugs?
You would still need something to "start" roating the engine to draw in and compress the air/fuel so the spark plugs can ignite the air/fuel mixture as opposed to tryin to ignite a puddle of liquid fuel.
I've thought about this myself, and I think I've come up with a better idea. Why not attach a length of stiff metal to the end of the crankshaft on the front of the engine, extend it out to the front of the vehicle with a handle on it to turn the engine over while the key is in the "on" position? This would eliminate the starter and save a lot of money, in my opinion. Who's with me?
I've thought about this myself, and I think I've come up with a better idea. Why not attach a length of stiff metal to the end of the crankshaft on the front of the engine, extend it out to the front of the vehicle with a handle on it to turn the engine over while the key is in the "on" position? This would eliminate the starter and save a lot of money, in my opinion. Who's with me?
You know, back in the 20's and 30's that's how the engines were started.
If you want to fire up a 460 using a hand crank be my guest, I'll stick with my conventional electric starter.
"Why they still hang off the side down in the water/mud next to the exhaust pipe might be a better question."
Probably because the real estate elsewhere on the engine is occupied, and it is (theoretically...) easy to replace it there.
A Cadillac guy quoted in Hot Rod, answering the question about putting the starter in the valley between the cylinder banks, like Lexus or Infiniti, said the starters die from heat or water. Less heat and no water in there, so you'll not be needing to get to the starter..... If you could prove the "Bendix" gizmo would last as long as the protected electric motor, I think you'd be on to something. Of course, on some rigs, it might be easier to pull the intake than to pull the headers to get to the starter.
Next time I engineer a new engine from a clean slate I'll think about it......
Well, if you're going to go that route-
With all the chemical technologies, why do we need to change the oil? Why do parts wear out? Why do tires wear out? Why do brakes wear out?
I think a starter isn't that bad of a failure item. I know they can be a pain to replace, but how often do you really replace them?
So I was at the truck show last year and one of the exhibits shows this up-and-coming technology whereby a quite large alternator is installed (somewhere) inside the bell housing. This power supply drives all parasitic loads electrically...so your fan, water pump, oil pump, air compressor, air conditioner....everything except the camshaft was driven electrically.
It is only a small task to install electronic switching gear to make that alternator into a starter.
So, I guess it's already been done, at least on paper.
There actually was some discussion about eliminating starters. This was when they were trying out electrically acuated valves. Never went anywhere because the whole 42 volt electrical system turned out to have problems.
Thought was that with the electrical valves, they could seal seal the cylinder whenever it was close to the right position. Apparently they thought that they could get enough of a pop to get things going even without compression. Does seem tricky. I wouldn't want to rely on it at -25 ( that's F , not those wimpy C degrees).
My Dad did use one of those mechanically operated starters fairly often when we had a Model A-- wanted to 'save the battery'.He never complained that they removed that option when he got a newer car.
Well, if you're going to go that route-
With all the chemical technologies, why do we need to change the oil? Why do parts wear out? Why do tires wear out? Why do brakes wear out?
I think a starter isn't that bad of a failure item. I know they can be a pain to replace, but how often do you really replace them?
Pulled the starter on my Bradley today to replace the solenoid .... easy on the VW engine.
So I was at the truck show last year and one of the exhibits shows this up-and-coming technology whereby a quite large alternator is installed (somewhere) inside the bell housing. This power supply drives all parasitic loads electrically...so your fan, water pump, oil pump, air compressor, air conditioner....everything except the camshaft was driven electrically.
It is only a small task to install electronic switching gear to make that alternator into a starter.
So, I guess it's already been done, at least on paper.
I don't think you can make an alternator into a starter motor but you can and they did make a generator into a starter. The old pre-alternator John Deere lawn and garden tractors used the generator as a starter motor. It didn't have nearly as muchpunch as a regular starter because it was belt driven. I had a 74 Suzuki GT185 motorcycle that also used the generator as a starter motor.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.