When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ok here it goes , I am having a couple clearance issues in the motor dept. I have a 351w with aod trans and a mustang II front susp with a flaming river rack . I am having issues with front to back clearance ,rack sits higher than x member and rear sump pan clears the x member but not the rack so Icant go forward more and I only have about an eighth inch at the firewall and a sixteenth at the rack that is with the rack spaced out 5/8 already but if I offset the motor 1 1/2 inches it puts the motor more in the recess of the firewall and gives me plenty of room . can I offset it or does that hurt anything else .
do these offset measurements sound right
frame wid. at front pulley - 32" half = 16 - 1.5 " = 14.5' from pass fr. rail
frame width at rear of trans- 33.5'" half= 16.75- 1.5" =15.25 " "
8' rearend is close to center maybe just slightly towards pass side is this ok shaft will run at a slight angle
A lot of folks with the stock or Volrae steering routinely offset the motor more than you propose to get clearance at their driver side headers. I don't see a problem doing what you want here.
I am using 302 in my '50 F1; MII and AOD. I offset my motor and tranny 1.5" to passenger side; pan clears, had issues with steering and motor mount but I fabbed mount to allow it to clear.
Mine is offset 2" to the pass side with absolutely no problem at all. You should be ok.
PS: I use the exploder rear and it goes 105 MPH with no vibes at 3 degree pinion.
Jon
Havi, we will need to remaind the guys that a 1" offset from the driver side will equal a
2" difference when measured. I really believe the most important thing here would be the pinion angle. Keeping in mind that I have the Exploder which is already offset. I have also noticed that a lot of 53-56 owners have not realized that the firewall is already offset to the right (pass ) side from factory. Not noticable until you measure it. Seems offsets are nothing out of the ordinary in a lot of vehicles.
Jon
thanks you for the responses and info ,do the measurments sound right , i just keep it square with the frame rail right? not sure if i got it right because the frame width changes but it should be ok becuase I am measuring from center on both ends correct ? the shaft at a slight angle wont bother?
again thanks for the help.
Yes, keep the crank centerline parallel with the center of the frame. That will result in the same offset angle at the tranny and pinion when viewed from the top, a perfectly acceptable situation AFA the U joints are considered. A lot of vehicles are built with the engine and/or pinion location offset from side to side at the factory.
I don't know what you're using for a tranny mount but No-Limit Engineering sells an offset tranny mount. I used one of their mounts on my truck and it saved a lot of fabrication hassle...
thanks AX and GNW so the rear pinion at an offset of about an inch more toward center than the tailshaft is ok . GNW thanks for the info but I already have a custom x member ready I can just offset my mounting plate .
Mod22, I also put the 351/AOD combo in mine, It is very tight without the offset. IAm I reading correctly , you have 1/16" clearence ,oilpan to rack? Seems a bit close IMHO.Might want to give that drivetrain some wiggle-room,solid urethane engine mounts? The rubber ones move alot...then tend to "sqaush" or sag later, leaving you in a different place than when you started.
I used a 351 block into a mustang fox body conversion oilpan,..
ended upwith the front sump( which wraps around the oilpump),
being alot tighter around the pump..allowing a little more clearence at the rack/crossmember area...and also allowed the engine to drop down a little bit more. The steering IS tight though at the header,
an offset if it doesn't bother you WILL make life easier.Just my .02$
Good Luck!!
perhaps old hat already, but here's a link to my 400 in the F1 frame. The frame mounts are '79 factory, and centered equidistant on the frame, yet the crank bolt is offset to the Pass. side a couple inches. This shows that Ford offset the motor in 4x4's in the 1970's. https://www.ford-trucks.com/user_gal...157525&width=2
No problem with your horizontal offset between tailshaft and pinion. Where novice builders get in trouble is when they think they should point the tailshaft at the pinion, angling the engine. A lot of 4x4s have a very strong offset to clear the front driveshaft.