Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

2bbl. to 4 bbl?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #16  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,979
Likes: 2,734
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
He just bought a brand new carb, so lets keep going down that path. I would check the timing. Clean the damper off really good, and then check the timing with the vacuum line to the dist unplugged. After you check/set the timing, then rev the engine with the vacuum line off. The timing mark should move up the scale when you rev the engine.

Then take the vacuum line, and increase the speed of the engine till you feel vacuum on the line with your finger. Then while looking at the damper with the timing light, plug the line into the dist, and then unplug it. Everytime you do this, you should see the timing mark jump up the scale.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #17  
ssidney's Avatar
ssidney
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: pg b.c
one backfire on start-up with that holley could blow out the pwr vlve and cause the problem described
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 06:11 PM
  #18  
rbaker6336's Avatar
rbaker6336
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,191
Likes: 4
From: Blairsville,Ga
Originally Posted by ssidney
one backfire on start-up with that holley could blow out the pwr vlve and cause the problem described
all holleys built since '92 have backfire blowout preventers,I'm sure rebuilds do also
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #19  
ssidney's Avatar
ssidney
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: pg b.c
Originally Posted by rbaker6336
all holleys built since '92 have backfire blowout preventers,I'm sure rebuilds do also
wouldn't bet on it...found out hard way last summer, then I bought a motorcraft .....again
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #20  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,979
Likes: 2,734
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Motorcraft uses power valves that can and do blow out also.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #21  
rbaker6336's Avatar
rbaker6336
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,191
Likes: 4
From: Blairsville,Ga
I have run holley carbs for 45+ years and have yet to have a power valve malfuntion
I have however had probly a half dozen with motorcraft
guess the are a lot of people who don't like and or understand the function of a holley carb,I could care less
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #22  
ssidney's Avatar
ssidney
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: pg b.c
Originally Posted by LARIAT 85
Franklin, I always respect your advice, but I am going to have to disagree with you on this one. A 600cfm carburetor is much too big for a STOCK or mildly built little 302 engine in a fullsize TRUCK application. YES, the 600cfm carb will work on a 302 engine, but a carb more in the range of 500cfm would probably be a better choice for the average driver of a 302 in a full size Ford truck.

bigdavevader, you have to ask yourself what you HONESTLY plan to use your truck for. A smaller carb in the 500cfm range will give you better throttle response down low and more torque, which is what you really need to move a heavy, fullsize Ford truck with a relatively small 302 engine. And, a 500cfm caburetor is good all the way up to 5800rpms.

If you browse around in the 300 inline six forum, you will find that the Holley 390cfm carburetor with an offy intake is most common application, hands down. Well, a 302 is only 2 cubic inches more engine than the 300, so why would anyone go all the way to a 600cfm carburetor (unless they are racing the truck)?

The bigger 600cfm carburetor offers more power in the higher rpm range, but it sacrifices low end torque. If you plan on racing your pickup truck or using it in a high rpm range, then get a 600cfm carburetor.

There is a scientific formula for this:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/calculat...-air_capacity/
the reason why is the difference in the RPM range that 302's run as apposed to 300's, ford used that size carb on many applications of their small-blocks with great success, as a matter of fact a 600cfm 4v is more suited to the 302 than a 400cfm 2v b/c the secondaries are only in use when the engine wants them
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #23  
ssidney's Avatar
ssidney
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: pg b.c
As for the carb size calculator (street carb), if you plug in 5500rpm with a 351, you end up with a 475cfm carb...then why did ford trucks on the mid/late '80's come with a 600cfm holley ??? BTW I owned a '87 351 4v stock and it pulled like a *******, not the least bit over-carbed..so I guess that throws that theory out the window eh?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #24  
LARIAT 85's Avatar
LARIAT 85
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 22
From: Florence, SC
As for the carb size calculator (street carb), if you plug in 5500rpm with a 351, you end up with a 475cfm carb...then why did ford trucks on the mid/late '80's come with a 600cfm holley ??? BTW I owned a '87 351 4v stock and it pulled like a *******, not the least bit over-carbed..so I guess that throws that theory out the window eh?

A Ford truck with the relatively small 302 V-8 engine NEVER came stock with a 600cfm Holley buddy. In fact, a 302 NEVER left the factory with a 4V; it was always a 2V, and most of them were a small 287cfm carburetor.

Engine cubic inches X Max. RPMs / 3456 = ___cfm carburetor

This formula works assuming that your engine operates at 100% volumetric efficiency. Most stock engines operate at only 85% volumetric efficiency, and a well-built engine is usually around the 90-95% range. In which case you would multiply the end result above by 0.85 (or 0.90 or 0.95) for 85% volumetric efficiency.

As for the 351...well that is a full 51 cubic inches MORE than a 302. And, according to the formula, assuming 100% volumetric efficiency, that would make a 559cfm carburetor IDEAL for the 351 engine running 5500rpm. (How often do you plan on running the engine HIGHER than 5,500 rpms?) Well guess what, no manufacturer I know makes a 559cfm carburetor. BUT, Ford/Motorcraft did have a 600cfm carb already in use for the 5.0 Ford Mustangs during the mid/late '80s, AND the F-Series with the big block 460 V-8 used (only) the 600cfm carburetor as well.

So now you know WHY that carburetor was used.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #25  
ssidney's Avatar
ssidney
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: pg b.c
according to the calculator, which is the point I'm questioning, a 351 would need a 475cfm carb...what I'm trying to say is the theory is flawed in such simple form, ask anybody that actually put a 600 on a stock 5l
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #26  
oldblue_123's Avatar
oldblue_123
New User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
I have ran holleys, edelbrocks,motorcrafts, qaudra jets, on everything from chevys to fords 2barrels and 4 barrels, 500 cfm-750 cfm, stock motors to built motors. and One of my favorite carbureators is the holley 500 cfm 2 barrel, I had one I put on a stock 390, I liked the fact they were easy to get parts for, and with a little knowledge you can tune them to get the performance You want we experimented with different jets, and accelarator pumps until I got the performance and mileage that I wanted, and holley has a really good website with alot of info as to considerations when choosing a carb, I had one complaint about holleys and that was offraod the floats would stick, but now they have a kit to eliminate that issue.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #27  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,979
Likes: 2,734
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
I have seen the calculators also, and they are in the theoretical world, while like to stay in the practical real world.

The #1850 Holley 600cfm with manual choke is the cheapest, simplest carb they make, and I have had very good success with them on several 302's. No black smoke, no little dead spots or hesitation, really a pretty boring install, since it drives just like factory, though when you get on it, the engine seems more willing to rev up. The 390 cfm is way more expensive.

The vacuum secondary carbs are more forgiving, since they will automatically size themselves to the engine you put it on. If the engine can't take the full output of the carb, then the secondaries will not open up till it can.

I believe some of the factories also went with the real world theory, since most chevrolets from a 305 up to a 454 came from the factory with a 750cfm or larger quadrajet. It also has a "self sizing feature with the air door on top of the secondaries.

Of course we all know the 302 did come from the factory with a 4bbl, but not in a 80-up pickup. Most of the time Ford did seem to use an oddball cfm rated carb, and a lot of them where in the 500 cfm range. They never used a stock off the shelf Holley carb that I know of, they always modified them to suit what they were doing. They also where jetted very lean. I have a Ford/Holley carb, and it's very close to 600 cfm, but it has #62 jets in the primaries. Most #1850 Holley's come with #66 jets in the primaries.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #28  
LARIAT 85's Avatar
LARIAT 85
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 22
From: Florence, SC
Of course we all know the 302 did come from the factory with a 4bbl, but not in a 80-up pickup.
You are correct. NEVER in an '80 and up pickup.

The vacuum secondary carbs are more forgiving, since they will automatically size themselves to the engine you put it on. If the engine can't take the full output of the carb, then the secondaries will not open up till it can.
I will agree with that statement. Which is why a 600cfm carburetor WILL WORK with a 302 engine. A 650 double pumper WILL WORK also, although it won't be as efficient.

Thing is, most stock and midly modified 302 truck engines CAN NOT "take the full output" of a 600cfm carburetor, which is why I said that a 600cfm carburetor is too big. Again, it will still work, but you will probably be over-carbureting your engine.

In addition, you will be WASTING GAS and sacrifice throttle response (and low end torque - essential for moving a HEAVY F-Series truck with a little 302) running on the bigger primaries of a 600cfm carburetor, vs. running on smaller primaries on a smaller carburetor.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #29  
XLnAK's Avatar
XLnAK
Tuned
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Eagle River, Alaska
BigDave check to see that you are getting a good stream of fuel upon moving the throtle lever about 1/4 stroke. A lean condition off idle will cause this hesitation. Do this with the engine off looking right down the carb(with a mirror if ya wanta be safe). It should happen almost instantly. If not this is your bog. New or not you could have a bad or stuck accellerator pump check ball or valve, letting fuel back into the carb fuel bowl instead of the air stream.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 12:22 AM
  #30  
fordtruckf150's Avatar
fordtruckf150
New User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
1986 ford f150

I have a 1986 ford f150. It came with and has in it a 2bbl carb. I want to switch it to a 4bbl carb. What intake manifold should I go with or could I even find one from a used truck and just put it on there or would I have to switch a couple of things as well as the intake manifold. I found a stock 351w intake manifold for $30. Just what else what I have to do or need?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE