94 Ranger

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 19, 2008 | 03:32 PM

#16

Quackhead94ranger

Senior User

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 431

Likes: 0

From: stevens point

mine looks exactly like this one.. but w/ 5 and the tenths
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/93-94...ayphotohosting

if u read the description.. seems like it came from new york? is there a plant there?

Last edited by Quackhead94ranger; Feb 19, 2008 at 03:34 PM. Reason: need to add something

Feb 19, 2008 | 07:51 PM

#17

4banger94

Freshman User

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 32

Likes: 0

From: Chino Valley, AZ

Mine has a tach and only 5 digits plus the tenths. It says 88424.1 and I know thats right since I bought it new just 14 years ago.

Feb 19, 2008 | 09:00 PM

#18

DesertStorm

Elder User

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 782

Likes: 0

From: South Carolina

Both of mine have 5 digits. What I am thinking is that Ford started to revamp the interior for the 1995 year model during late production of 94 models. B/C in 95 rangers cam with airbags standard. Thats why I have pre-95 models. I hate airbags, and the frames are different. The crush zones on 95's and up are different. The frame has deeper ripples where the bumper mounts compared to 94 and earlier. Just some of my personal observations while working on these AWESOME vehicles.

Feb 19, 2008 | 09:09 PM

#19

Hank85713

Cargo Master

Joined: Feb 2002

Posts: 2,414

Likes: 22

From: Tucson USA

mine has tach and the 5 digits and tenths. mine is a mid year I believe as I have had to go to 93 to ID some parts one time as the late 94-95 item was different. Just cant remember what part it was.

Feb 19, 2008 | 10:01 PM

#20

landryd

Freshman User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 29

Likes: 0

As I posted before, I have 6 digits showing 107,000. I bought mine Dec. 1994. I believe it was assembled in the fall of that year. So what DesertStorm says may be the answer. BTW I served (AF) in DS north of Riyadh from Sep 90 to Apr 91. Still serving today 23 yrs +.

Feb 20, 2008 | 08:28 AM

#21

seadoo

Senior User

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 325

Likes: 0

From: Manassas Park, VA

Quote:

Originally Posted by landryd

As I posted before, I have 6 digits showing 107,000. I bought mine Dec. 1994. I believe it was assembled in the fall of that year. So what DesertStorm says may be the answer.

That makes sense. I bought mine late August 94 and it was made early July 94, and i to have the six digits showing 106,000. Only other thing that might make sense is the different trim levels might have used different odometers

Feb 20, 2008 | 09:19 AM

#22

Fordsflylow

Postmaster

Joined: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,595

Likes: 0

From: IL

Quote:

Originally Posted by bazzman1953

???
My '94 says 178,xxx on its odometer. Unless the Ranger was that much different then my Mazda it should show six digits, not five. I, too, suggest carfax.

I was wondering the same thing as mine has a 6 digit odo and she is a Ranger!?!

Feb 20, 2008 | 09:21 AM

#23

Fordsflylow

Postmaster

Joined: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,595

Likes: 0

From: IL

Quote:

Originally Posted by CheapRanger

I know in the 94 there were two different dash clusters. One had the tach and one didn't. For those of you who responded 5 or 6, please state which cluster you have (wondering if that is the difference due to spacing).

Thanks

Mine doesn't have an rpm gauge!