Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Post your specs and gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 02-03-2008, 10:17 PM
Hunt4Fun's Avatar
Hunt4Fun
Hunt4Fun is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
90 4X4, rebuilt 302 with some "high performance parts." I didn't do the rebuild and neither did the guy I bought it from.

My mechanic said it has an oversized cam, high performance distributor from what he could tell. I changed the distributor cap and rotor this week.

Mileage has always been 10.5. I'm hopeful that the new gears in the front, new rebuilt axles in front, replaced wheel bearings, will help.

Planning on new wires and plugs soon. Truck has a camper shell.
 
  #47  
Old 02-04-2008, 03:53 PM
lostin90s's Avatar
lostin90s
lostin90s is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 3,978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
94 from my sig . Been averaging 15.3 last 3 week and that is with morning deice sessions.

96 F150 5.8 10-12 MPG with e40d 4x4 and 3:55 rears. You know the typical 351.
 
  #48  
Old 02-04-2008, 08:41 PM
White Max's Avatar
White Max
White Max is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Imperial, MO
Posts: 959
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
1995 F-150 4x4, 5.0L, 4R70W, Regular Cab/Long Bed, 3.31's, 32x11.50's - 11-13 MPG

-Rod
 
  #49  
Old 02-05-2008, 08:56 AM
jas88's Avatar
jas88
jas88 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,302
Likes: 0
Received 358 Likes on 288 Posts
1991 F150 4.9L, ZF5, 3.08, 31" tires, gets about 17-18 all the time, it doesn't seem to care if it is city or highway.
 
  #50  
Old 02-05-2008, 12:36 PM
bigbad'945.0's Avatar
bigbad'945.0
bigbad'945.0 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: H-Town
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1994 F-150 Single Cab
302
Ravin Exhaust
K&N filter

I regularly run Seafoam and if I drive like a grandpa I can get around 14.5 mpg.
 
  #51  
Old 02-05-2008, 03:24 PM
phoneman91's Avatar
phoneman91
phoneman91 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Aurora,Colorado
Posts: 2,021
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by jas88
1991 F150 4.9L, ZF5, 3.08, 31" tires, gets about 17-18 all the time, it doesn't seem to care if it is city or highway.
31 inch tires and 3.08 ratio with overdrive?? What kind of RPMs are you pulling at 60 MPH--1600??
 
  #52  
Old 02-05-2008, 04:41 PM
ssidney's Avatar
ssidney
ssidney is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: pg b.c
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phoneman91
31 inch tires and 3.08 ratio with overdrive?? What kind of RPMs are you pulling at 60 MPH--1600??
that would put him right in the torque band for an I6
 
  #53  
Old 02-05-2008, 05:06 PM
jas88's Avatar
jas88
jas88 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,302
Likes: 0
Received 358 Likes on 288 Posts
31 inch tires and 3.08 ratio with overdrive?? What kind of RPMs are you pulling at 60 MPH--1600??
Yeah, about. The 300 likes a tall gear. I used to have 3.55 and the 3.08 works better with the six. Makes my 4th gear more useable. I still start out in 2nd on the ZF with no prob.
 
  #54  
Old 02-05-2008, 05:20 PM
antivtec's Avatar
antivtec
antivtec is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Palestine, IN
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my old 92 f150 reg cab/long bed 4x4 with 302, aod, 32x11.50x15 mud terrains, long tube headers and true duals never once averaged over 9.6mpg, city or high way.

my new 89 250 hd reg cab long bed 4x4 351 c6 33x12.50,16.5 all terrains, stock manifolds and true duals... well dont know yet. still working out vaccum lines and and other little quirks trying to get it running right. not looking forward to the mileage it's going to be getting
 
  #55  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:11 AM
wheelinfree69's Avatar
wheelinfree69
wheelinfree69 is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Powell River B,C. CAN
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the same setup as Rikard, same mileage too, but I found I get better mileage at highway speeds 80 + kmh.
It's the 3.55 gears that cause the lack of good mileage.
 
  #56  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:44 AM
Lynk's Avatar
Lynk
Lynk is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimbo beam
...
I've done various performance upgrades to all three of my trucks. My basic theory is when a engine's output is increased, but it's stress level is not, then fuel mileage will improve. For example if you take two absolute completely equal vehicles, the only factor being one has 200 horsepower and the other has 250. Does it not make sense that the higher powered engine would endue less stress when the two are accelarating at the same rate?
It's not about stress levels, but rather engine efficiency and total system loss.
 
  #57  
Old 02-06-2008, 04:50 AM
mike330's Avatar
mike330
mike330 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
96 302 auto w/ 355 gears, I avg. 16 mixed use with 265 tires, Lets see what happens next week when the 33s go on.
 
  #58  
Old 02-06-2008, 11:09 AM
78bigunns's Avatar
78bigunns
78bigunns is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Culpeper, Virginia
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
96' F350 Crewcab 4x4 5.8L E4OD, steel diamond plate bedliner, figure weighs about 200lbs?, 235/245 tires.

Guessing around 12mpg. Neither tank reads, and my driving is varied enough that I don't bother to check. I figure 12mpg is a base.

I need new tires, thinking of going slightly bigger to bring down the rear end ratio some.

Looking to do full headers and custom single exhaust when I'm done installing my new carport and can work under it. Next couple months.
 
  #59  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:14 PM
phoneman91's Avatar
phoneman91
phoneman91 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Aurora,Colorado
Posts: 2,021
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by ssidney
that would put him right in the torque band for an I6
You are right about that--that 4.9 sure does pull from off idle. It is a very well developed truck engine. Too bad the straight six gas engine isnt in style anymore amoung the present day engineers
 
  #60  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:18 PM
phoneman91's Avatar
phoneman91
phoneman91 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Aurora,Colorado
Posts: 2,021
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Lynk
It's not about stress levels, but rather engine efficiency and total system loss.
What do you call it--volumetric efficiency?? The total volume of the cylinder that gets filled on each downstoke. And I suspect that thermal efficiency is a factor also.

What did I read--33 percent of the energy goes out the exhaust as heat and another 33 percent gets into the cooling system as heat and only 33 percent of the total energy gets to the crankshaft--in a typical 4 stroke gasoline engine .
 

Last edited by phoneman91; 02-06-2008 at 02:20 PM.


Quick Reply: Post your specs and gas mileage



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM.