Post your specs and gas mileage
#46
90 4X4, rebuilt 302 with some "high performance parts." I didn't do the rebuild and neither did the guy I bought it from.
My mechanic said it has an oversized cam, high performance distributor from what he could tell. I changed the distributor cap and rotor this week.
Mileage has always been 10.5. I'm hopeful that the new gears in the front, new rebuilt axles in front, replaced wheel bearings, will help.
Planning on new wires and plugs soon. Truck has a camper shell.
My mechanic said it has an oversized cam, high performance distributor from what he could tell. I changed the distributor cap and rotor this week.
Mileage has always been 10.5. I'm hopeful that the new gears in the front, new rebuilt axles in front, replaced wheel bearings, will help.
Planning on new wires and plugs soon. Truck has a camper shell.
#47
#51
#52
#54
my old 92 f150 reg cab/long bed 4x4 with 302, aod, 32x11.50x15 mud terrains, long tube headers and true duals never once averaged over 9.6mpg, city or high way.
my new 89 250 hd reg cab long bed 4x4 351 c6 33x12.50,16.5 all terrains, stock manifolds and true duals... well dont know yet. still working out vaccum lines and and other little quirks trying to get it running right. not looking forward to the mileage it's going to be getting
my new 89 250 hd reg cab long bed 4x4 351 c6 33x12.50,16.5 all terrains, stock manifolds and true duals... well dont know yet. still working out vaccum lines and and other little quirks trying to get it running right. not looking forward to the mileage it's going to be getting
#55
#56
Originally Posted by jimbo beam
...
I've done various performance upgrades to all three of my trucks. My basic theory is when a engine's output is increased, but it's stress level is not, then fuel mileage will improve. For example if you take two absolute completely equal vehicles, the only factor being one has 200 horsepower and the other has 250. Does it not make sense that the higher powered engine would endue less stress when the two are accelarating at the same rate?
I've done various performance upgrades to all three of my trucks. My basic theory is when a engine's output is increased, but it's stress level is not, then fuel mileage will improve. For example if you take two absolute completely equal vehicles, the only factor being one has 200 horsepower and the other has 250. Does it not make sense that the higher powered engine would endue less stress when the two are accelarating at the same rate?
#58
96' F350 Crewcab 4x4 5.8L E4OD, steel diamond plate bedliner, figure weighs about 200lbs?, 235/245 tires.
Guessing around 12mpg. Neither tank reads, and my driving is varied enough that I don't bother to check. I figure 12mpg is a base.
I need new tires, thinking of going slightly bigger to bring down the rear end ratio some.
Looking to do full headers and custom single exhaust when I'm done installing my new carport and can work under it. Next couple months.
Guessing around 12mpg. Neither tank reads, and my driving is varied enough that I don't bother to check. I figure 12mpg is a base.
I need new tires, thinking of going slightly bigger to bring down the rear end ratio some.
Looking to do full headers and custom single exhaust when I'm done installing my new carport and can work under it. Next couple months.
#59
#60
Originally Posted by Lynk
It's not about stress levels, but rather engine efficiency and total system loss.
What did I read--33 percent of the energy goes out the exhaust as heat and another 33 percent gets into the cooling system as heat and only 33 percent of the total energy gets to the crankshaft--in a typical 4 stroke gasoline engine .
Last edited by phoneman91; 02-06-2008 at 02:20 PM.