When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The way I've always looked at it: a tax, is a tax, is a tax. It HAS to come from somewhere. We may not agree with it's spending 100%, but all gov'ts have to aquire money for public services from someplace. At least with the fuel tax, we are being taxed for what we use and the money, generally, is getting put back into roads and such. Out of all the taxes out there, it's one of the fairer ones and doesn't have the loopholes for the filthy rich to hide their $$$'s in.
Remind me to never start another subject that can be twisted in a political discussion!
But the point is, while Americans are suffering with these $3.00+ a gallon prices, the oil companies are posting record profits year after year. And yes, I guess this makes me mad because of the mileage my Excursion gets. Just like with the housing market being so bad now, my real estate property asessment went up another record 19% this year. While everybody wittles away at my wallet, I am going from middle class America right into perhaps qualifying for food stamps soon.
I do apologize for getting off onto the political track. Seems easy to get 'riled up' these days.
Interesting you mention the housing thing; our taxes went up 4% this last year, however, my real estate agent said that property values for the whole county dropped 1% in the last year???????? Go figure.
We should have a FLAT TAX! Everyone would pay their fair shair. If I want to buy a expensive car I pay the same percentage of the sale as if you would buy a cheap car. Seems easy to me. I know therir would be some problems but why tax the tar out of me, a hard working guy, when their are some of us that sit on their lazy .... and collect checks. Whose the dumb one?? We need some real TAX REFORM! Sorry for rant. Later
No matter what the case is, I still feel that these obnoxious salaries that CEO's make is crazy. The CEO of a major company is not being paid for his ability to run a company (they really do little no oversight of the actual company), but more simply for their ability to hire top level executives. These in turn hire lower level, these hire lower level, ect. ect., and then THESE finally oversee direct operations. And I'm sorry, but 20, 30, 50million is WAaaay too much money for an 'idea man' (what CEO usually means).
Without this "idea man" to hire these people to hire those people till we get to those that oversee direct operations, would these people in the last category be able to function? Sure, they would be able to do a job but what direction would they take? Yes, the CEO doesn't clean the bathrooms but he hires someone who would hire the guy and hires someone to oversee the guy, etc, etc.
OTOH, what would you say if someone told you that YOU made too much money for what you did since you didn't do this, that or the other? IF the market is able to support me being a CEO for $20K a year, so be it.
We should have a FLAT TAX! Everyone would pay their fair shair. If I want to buy a expensive car I pay the same percentage of the sale as if you would buy a cheap car. Seems easy to me. I know therir would be some problems but why tax the tar out of me, a hard working guy, when their are some of us that sit on their lazy .... and collect checks. Whose the dumb one?? We need some real TAX REFORM! Sorry for rant. Later
Can't do that because politician need some way to hide around the idea that they are buying votes. If we had a flat tax which taxed you at the paycheck level, and nowhere else, you would know what you are paying for exactly. This way there are so many taxes that you can't keep track of what you are paying for what.
The way I've always looked at it: a tax, is a tax, is a tax. It HAS to come from somewhere. We may not agree with it's spending 100%, but all gov'ts have to aquire money for public services from someplace. At least with the fuel tax, we are being taxed for what we use and the money, generally, is getting put back into roads and such. Out of all the taxes out there, it's one of the fairer ones and doesn't have the loopholes for the filthy rich to hide their $$$'s in.
Not always. In WI Gov Doyle raided it so he could balance the budget and buy a few votes. IF we had a flat tax system, he'd have to raise taxes and get more people riled up
I have no problem having someone critique how much money I make as a CEO. I am our companies 'idea man' as well as the one who risked every penny I had to start the company. And again, I have no issue in paying someone lucratively for leading a company. However, the business world in general has critisized large corporations that lavish their executives with HUGE HUGE salaries/bonuses/perks. At this point, how can you justify paying any person 30 million dollars a year, plus bonuses and perks? This isn't from my own mouth, its' from the wall street journal, business weekly, Inc., ect ect ect.
I'm not saying that these people should fork over that money to us as the consumer. I would rather see them give $1K a year more in pay or beni's to their staff that get penny pinched.
I read that too about Doyle. That one ticked me off!
Ever notice how it seems elections are not so much about the issues now as it is about who can raise (or swipe) the most $$$???????? Lets give every candidate a small budget and when that's up, your done campaigning.
Last edited by Aaron Steinblock; Feb 2, 2008 at 04:40 PM.
But the point is, while Americans are suffering with these $3.00+ a gallon prices, the oil companies are posting record profits year after year.
And yes, I guess this makes me mad because of the mileage my Excursion gets.
Just like with the housing market being so bad now, my real estate property asessment went up another record 19% this year. While everybody wittles away at my wallet, I am going from middle class America right into perhaps qualifying for food stamps soon.
It is impressive because you insist on looking at the huge bell ringing number. Last time they talked about 10 billion a quarter and got people like you riled up. Today they talk about a 40 billion annual number for the same reason. Maybe next year they will talk about a 5 year profit number for the same reason. Ever wonder why the profit is talked about while the amount they spent has to be looked for?
So sell your Excursion and buy a TDI Jetta that gets 50+ mpg.
Will you vote for your state level representatives if they told you that because of the bad housing market they don't collect enough taxes and so we have to close down some schools and consolidate others and cut other services? Probably not. Americans want to hear how they will get something while not wanting to hear about the price. Ever heard how people talk about pedestrian rights, this rights, that rights? Sure you have. Ever heard these same people talk about their duties? Probably not.
I have no problem having someone critique how much money I make as a CEO. I am our companies 'idea man' as well as the one who risked every penny I had to start the company. And again, I have no issue in paying someone lucratively for leading a company. However, the business world in general has critisized large corporations that lavish their executives with HUGE HUGE salaries/bonuses/perks. At this point, how can you justify paying any person 30 million dollars a year, plus bonuses and perks? This isn't from my own mouth, its' from the wall street journal, business weekly, Inc., ect ect ect.
Ever notice how it seems elections are not so much about the issues now as it is about who can raise (or swipe) the most $$$???????? Lets give every candidate a small budget and when that's up, your done campaigning.
OK. Lets say you decided to quit your position and go somewhere else. If you see that a CEO out there is being paid 20 million and you think you are worth what he is. Would you accept 5 million to do the same job? I would want to be paid what the market was going at irrespective of who says what at the WSJ. IF those writers are so good, let them do the job for less money. Money is, for all practical purposes, one of the best (not only) way to attract talent. I wouldn't work for less than market rate, why should I expect anyone else to?
I don't care about their campaigning. I'm more worried about what they do AFTER it is done and they are in office. Then they start playing games with money, our money. Remember, those elected are playing around with real money and more to the point, OUR money. As I said before, they are using OUR money to buy themselves into office by doing this, that or the other with OUR money to pander to you so you will vote for them. Call it a tax rebate, tax refund, service that benefits only a minority of people, etc,etc.
I've thought it over, and I've decided to begrudge Mr. Tillerson in Mr. Sweet's place. I'm not sure I could spend $20 million in a lifetime.
Pat
Pat, I hope then that this won't insult you. I already have a mental list that would pretty much take care of 200 million or more if I were to win it tomorrow.
20 Million won't even be enough for ONE of my big items
Hey the point is about 15 to 20 years ago gas was around a dollar a gallon now its 3 in 20 years! Wow I wish cars, homes, pools, clothing, and the rest of the stuff we buy would only increase that much. Gas companies make more money buy getting us the lowest price possible. Do you think Maceys has a sale to lose money? I think 3 bucks isnt that bad, if you cant afford it walk or go green.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.