On demand power steering
Kaboom10 2002 5.4L 4wd F-150 w/33k/miles<O
</O
K&N replacement filter w/modified air box<O
</O
EBC brakes all around<O
</O
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f240/kaboom10/100_0165.jpg <O
></O
>
K&N replacement filter w/modified air box<O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img /> </O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img />
EBC brakes all around<O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img /> </O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img />
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f240/kaboom10/100_0165.jpg <O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img />
There should be little drag when the pump is idle. You contantly move the wheel more than you think when driving, so the clutch would constantly cycle and give no power gains until it burned out.
Kaboom10 2002 5.4L 4wd F-150 w/33k/miles<O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img /> </O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img />
K&N replacement filter w/modified air box<O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img /> </O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img />
EBC brakes all around<O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img /> </O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img />
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f240/kaboom10/100_0165.jpg <O class=inlineimg title=\"Stick Out Tongue\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src="http://images.ford-trucks.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif" <img />
It feels no different than a std hydraulic PS system with the added benefits of not robbing any engine power and taking up less space.
When I say electric PS I mean electrically assisted PS as the steering will work in an electric failure but like it's hydraulic counterpart it ain't easy.
The power steering module mounts behind the dash in the conditioned compartment which protects it from the elements and leaves very little clutter in the engine compartment.
I don't know how well it would work on larger heavier vehicles but it works very well in the compact SUV class.
I believe TRW makes the RAV 4 unit(s) but Delphi is a player also. http://delphi.com/manufacturers/auto.../electric/eps/
Another writeup, seems Ford & GM is starting to use it now also.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20696420/
Last edited by Volfandt; Jan 11, 2008 at 07:25 PM.
Trending Topics
Kaboom10 2002 5.4L 4wd F-150 w/33k/miles
K&N replacement filter w/modified air box
EBC brakes all around
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f240/kaboom10/100_0165.jpg
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
More common in Europe (Fiat and Peugeot use it a lot) and the fuel economy gain, on average, is 1 mpg. So if you're wondering what your parasitic loss is on a hyrdaulic system, it's in the neighborhood of 1 mpg.
This continuing electronic and electric load on the system is why a 42-volt system has been touted for the near-term future. Probably see two different circuits...a 12 volt (really 14) for the engine and 42v for all the accessories.
Kevin W.
1991 F-150 XLT Lariat 4x2 standard cab/long bed
4.9-liter six/Mazda 5-spd
Michigan







