Two strange questions
Kinda like the airplane treadmill question....

Ok, now I'll add a question.....I keep seeing in peoples' sigs a box about overclocking to fight cancer. Anybody got a link where maybe I can get in on the fun????
Here is the link https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/5...-part-2-a.html
And please do join up. It's a deal that uses our computers idle computing power to aid with cancer research. It's huge! Very important and the more help we can get the better.
I only have one computer running now, but some of the people who are very computer savvy are doing amazing stuff.
Lot's of groups are doing it, some are large and some are just computer clubs, a variety. FTE is sort of odd ball compared to some of the Universities and so forth, but we have reached the top one percent in terms of what we have contributed. So there is kind of a cool competitive thing going on too... Ford truck guys kicking academic butt. It's cool.
Grandparents Day
Parent Teacher Confrence Day
Thanksgiving
Tax Day
I think there could be more.....

Yes air has mass.
The earth is getting more crowded everyday. At least on this island. So I would say heavier, but I maybe wrong. It could get lighter because everything loses mass over time-I think. (except I seem to get heavier everday).
So, hub and tire same RPM, 0 speed at bottom, but 2xs as much on top, center of axle is the velocity of bike, and the air moves around with the tire, but at a slower speed.
Am I missing anything else?
To help wrap your head around that.
There are 2 basic types of velocity.. teh velocity you normally think of, linear velocity, and then there is angular velocity.
Now, the angular velocity of the tire, any point on it, the rim, the hub, is the same. The linerar velocity of the assembly is of course, the same, however that is an average velocity of all the parts.
Since the assembly is also rotating, the combined velocity, both angular and linear, at any given point in time, will not be similiar between two points of differant radii from the center, or even a differant angle from a given starting position of 0 degrees.
Now, to help in English.
a 30 inch street tire, like on my '02, and a 44 inch mudder, like what will be on my future bronco..
in order to go 1320 inches...um 110 feet?...the 30 incher has to rotate 44 times, while the 44 inch tire only has to rotate 30 times. now, if the two trucks are traveling at the same speed, obviously the 44 inch tire is rotating much slower.
Therefore, the 44 incher has a much lower angular velocity. however, it is maintaining the same linear velocity....btw....tanks and their treads are MUCH better example of this....and I dont know really whre to explain from here, except that a wheel powered vehicle moves fowards by placing more rubber/tread in front of the last rubber tread it laid down....much like how you put one foot in front of the other to move foward, except taht this is continuos.
now disregarding tire width, since we will pretend like that doesnt matter right now, no matter the size of the tire, in order to move foward 12 inches, it has to put down 12 inches of rubber, you with my crude explanation? well, if it needs to put down that 12 inches in a second, than at any location along the surface of the tire, the tire will be moving foward 12 inches of rubber in that second, now, if the tire is already moving foward at 12 inches / second, then if you look at the top of tire, it still needs to pass 12 inches of rubber / second to keep up the speed, add in its actual velocity and BAM! 24 inches / second instantaneous velocity.
Say. . . what?
Jim. . . have you been drinking, again? Because I can tell. Your speech is slurred, and I didn't understand a dad-burned thing you said.
Last edited by 00BlueOvalRanger; Dec 28, 2007 at 01:34 PM.
Jim. . . have you been drinking, again? Because I can tell. Your speech is slurred, and I didn't understand a dad-burned thing you said.
I used to do all my best writing when I was fitshaced....I get much more creative.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts








