When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
didnt ya know this is the new age loto,less money yes but alot better odds of winning. its sad to say the least but thats just the way it is nowadays to many folks lookin for that free ride
Just goes to further prove what my neighbor says...A shame is when a bus load of lawyers drives off a cliff...A damn shame is when there are a few empty seats!!!
The worst part of it is that the kid's parents will probably go broke trying to defend themselves. They can win, and yet lose because of the cost. I would sure hope the judge would throw it out, but I doubt it. Easy money... We had a lady (used loosely) that sued my parents over getting hurt working calves. Turns out she was a professional fall artist, lives off of settlements. She ended up losing the case, good thing for rural area judges with a little sense...
The suit claims Pfahler suffered a torn shoulder tendon and seeks compensation for physical therapy, vacation time, nursing and medical services provided by Pfahler's wife, and other expenses. It estimates the couple's losses at more than $75,000.
If all he is seeking is to be made whole for his losses, then that is a legitimate lawsuit. If the kid was skiing recklessly, the parents are responsible for the actions of their kid. My parents found that out after I got into an accident on my bicycle when I was 14 - cost their homeowners insurance a couple hundred grand. The woman had a broken hip and spent a few weeks in the hospital (including Christmas).
Unless the guys wife is a nurse or therapist, I doubt they'll get compensation for her medical services provided but the guy should get something if the kid was truly at fault.
Now if he was suing for loss of consortium, pain and suffering, punitive damages and so forth I'd say he was stretching it a bit. And he wants compensation for vacation time? Hell, he had a vacation rehabbing from the shoulder injury....
I got smashed into by a youngster on a Board, he was out of control and didn't care about anybody around him. I was stove up for more than a week, all he said was "Sorry Dude". I would of liked to sue him or just punch him in the face, either way I would of felt better. As far as the article, of cource the parents are going to say Little Jimmy wasn't going too fast or out of control.
He took the risk himself by going skiing in an area with other skiers, anybody who skies knows there is a chance of that happening. Whose to say he didn't cut in front of the kid. Ridiculous.
I got smashed into by a youngster on a Board, he was out of control and didn't care about anybody around him. I was stove up for more than a week, all he said was "Sorry Dude". I would of liked to sue him or just punch him in the face, either way I would of felt better. As far as the article, of cource the parents are going to say Little Jimmy wasn't going too fast or out of control.
I could see it if he was 14 but it said he was 7 when it happened, thats a first grader. My son is that age, yea he gets wound a little sometimes, and he has been known to run into stuff, or bump something and thats just walking. If you put him on skis, he wold not be reckless he would be falling down and doing strange things trying to figure out how how to controll himself. That's the way things are when you are skiing. I bumped into others when I went and others bumped into me. If you are going to go out there you should take the risks into account, and I don't mean the risk of being sued when you are trying to learn something new at 7 YEARS OLD.
I agree with the others who have posted before me, the kid is 7!!!!! He'd probably never been on skis before and was lucky to just be able to stay up on the skis long enough to run into somebody.
Just stick a ski up that guys *** and be done with it.
I am all for personal responsibilty but the seven year old shouldn't have been on the big hill UNTIL he could control himself. They have training areas for that.
Would you folks feel the same way if some 16 year old learning to drive broadsided your car and killed a family member? After all, driving is risky and you are the one who took the risk being on the road.
But it doesn't say whether or not they actually were on the hill or in the training area. What if this happened in the training area, is it still the kids fault because he wasn't born a perfect skier?
Any of the ski areas I have been in the training areas are very gentle slopes and very well supervised with instructors. I doubt it happened in the training area.
But, if the kid was out of control, then, yes, he is at fault and the parents have a responsibility.
Anyone ever see the ISF rules of conduct for skiing? Number two is CONTROL.