Notices

302 cam ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #1  
fomocoguy3's Avatar
fomocoguy3
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
302 cam ?'s

Ok, I've got a cam question for all you camshaft guru's. I'm building a mild 302 and want to figure out the best cam. It's a low mileage 72 shortbed truck, so the engine is only 8.2:1 compression. I'm installing some 1968 4barrel heads with a 53.2cc combustion chamber (factory is 58) so I think the compression will be around 8.8:1. I am using a Weiand dual plane intake and headers with 2.25" duals/ flowmasters. The heads have the factory press in studs, but if i have to I could have them machined for screw in studs. So what do you think? Duration? Lift? Basically I want the biggest thing that these engine specs will work well with.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #2  
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 6
From: Earth
Either Comp Cams XE250 or XE256 should work with no worries - valve lift is ~.45 - .49 and they'll work with stock springs (although you should go ahead and get the K-kit, IMO).
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 03:24 PM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Something wrong with your numbers. If the motor has stock pistons and it's a '72 302-2v the 58cc heads will give a 9.5:1 CR, and the 53cc heads will result in 10:1 CR. The cam you pick will be determined by the powerband you want, but generally with that much compression you can get away with longer duration... a 280 duration cam with at least 0.500" lift would be a good starting point I would think.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 03:38 PM
  #4  
fomocoguy3's Avatar
fomocoguy3
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Conanski
Something wrong with your numbers. If the motor has stock pistons and it's a '72 302-2v the 58cc heads will give a 9.5:1 CR, and the 53cc heads will result in 10:1 CR. The cam you pick will be determined by the powerband you want, but generally with that much compression you can get away with longer duration... a 280 duration cam with at least 0.500" lift would be a good starting point I would think.
I wish you were right, but I don't think you are. I have a small block builders book that says the same thing (9.5:1 with 58cc heads) but it pertains to a car 302. According to my 1971-78 Chiltons Van and Truck repair manual, the truck 302's are 8.2:1 compression in 1972, dropping from 8.6:1 in 1971. From what I've gathered the difference in compression was accomplished via dished pistons. I was hoping the heads were bigger, but unless someone can help out and prove me otherwise i believe the 2v heads were all the same.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #5  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
what do the pistons look like....and how far down the cylinders are they at TDC. Got any pics.....?
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #6  
fomocoguy3's Avatar
fomocoguy3
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HemiEater
what do the pistons look like....and how far down the cylinders are they at TDC. Got any pics.....?
No, I haven't even had it apart yet. It's a low mileage engine that runs like a top; I'm just gonna do some bolt-ons and such to perk it up a bit, so I have no idea if it has dished pistons or not, but I'm guessing it does. The truck engines back then were always lower compression and lower hp, and I'm pretty sure thats how they did it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 05:14 AM
  #7  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
just a little note not all books will give the same info.....compression HP etc.

what's the date code and casting number on the block....? it's up by the starter on the block
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #8  
fomocoguy3's Avatar
fomocoguy3
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HemiEater
just a little note not all books will give the same info.....compression HP etc.

what's the date code and casting number on the block....? it's up by the starter on the block
I dunno, later on I'll get down there with a wire brush and a flashlight and check.

In the mean time, it's such a mild build, I'm considering just keeping the stock cam and adding a set of 1.7 ratio rockers for a little more lift.

Any opinions on 1.7 ratio rockers? How much lift they will add?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #9  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
well lets say you have .450 lift at the valve with 1.6 rockers.... we need to get the lobe lift so .450/1.60 = .28125

now X that by 1.7 so .28125 X 1.7= .478125 valve lift
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #10  
fomocoguy3's Avatar
fomocoguy3
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HemiEater
well lets say you have .450 lift at the valve with 1.6 rockers.... we need to get the lobe lift so .450/1.60 = .28125

now X that by 1.7 so .28125 X 1.7= .478125 valve lift
Well that's a pretty good increase; do you know somewhere I may be able to find the factory cam specs?
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #11  
fomocoguy3's Avatar
fomocoguy3
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HemiEater
just a little note not all books will give the same info.....compression HP etc.

what's the date code and casting number on the block....? it's up by the starter on the block
It looks like the number is D2OE. It was really caked and hard to read, but I think thats what it says.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #12  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
there should be another number......

Thats a 72 casting but it might have been done in 75...
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #13  
fomocoguy3's Avatar
fomocoguy3
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Yeah, I've been looking in my book and at other sources and I can't find that as a block casting, only a head casting. I guess I'm gonna have to pull the starter down and brush that area clean with some degreaser.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #14  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
take a peek in here...
http://www.classicmustang.com/decoding_part_numbers.htm
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #15  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
72 302 will have an 8 to 1 comp ratio. He's dead on with that. And the XE series comp cams do not work well with pressed in rocker studs, Comp recommends against this combo. The 54 cc heads will perk the ratio up to about what he's figured. If you want a cam that'll work with what you've got, go with the Comp 268H, it'll work with the studs, springs and comp ratio.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE