Notices
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator Discussion

message center mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #1  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
message center mpg

what actually controls that? is it the pcm? before the supercharger install, it was pretty accurate...averaging around 15.5-16 on the highway....with my own calculations confirming that. after the install, it reads anywhere from 18-24 mpg on the highway, but when i do the math, it comes out to between 12.5-14.5 mpg. how would the s/c have affected it to be off that much?
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #2  
pdqford's Avatar
pdqford
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 37
From: Central NYS
Navie Newbie here

This is strictly a guess, but I thought the PCM kept track of the pulse width it supplied to the injectors and from that calculated the fuel used. And by keeping track of the VSS the PCM knew the distance traveled. Doing the math, the PCM then could display the MPG.

If you have raised the fuel pressure to compensate for the boost, or installed bigger injectors, the PCM wouldn't convert the injector pulse width to the correct amount of fuel used. (In other words, a given injector pulse width would squirt in more fuel than the PCM was using for its calculation.

I had a similar question about the message center: How do it know how much fuel you have added to the tank when it displays 'Miles to Empty'? Does it deduce the information from the voltage supplied by the fuel level indicator??

Hopefully, some one in the know will jump in here and shed some light on these mysteries.......
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #3  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
there are bigger injectors obviously. i have an xcall II as well, and the truck was dyno-tuned. here is a copy of my dynochart....looks like it may be running rich up until 3k rpms?? maybe someone can confirm/deny that, and if so, lmk if it can be readjusted no to be that rich down low.

 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #4  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
You're actually lean up until 3000rpms-a street SC'd engine should be no more than 12:1 A/F at WOT. The message center gets it's data from the PCM and it uses load, airflow and displacement, along with the injector size to calculate the mpg. The problem is...alot of tuners ratio things in the tune to get load right and to get make the tune safe. That'll throw off the message center every time.
JL
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 03:30 PM
  #5  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
You're actually lean up until 3000rpms-a street SC'd engine should be no more than 12:1 A/F at WOT. The message center gets it's data from the PCM and it uses load, airflow and displacement, along with the injector size to calculate the mpg. The problem is...alot of tuners ratio things in the tune to get load right and to get make the tune safe. That'll throw off the message center every time.
JL
so the a/f seems dead on then? guess the message center won't be right anymore....not that i don't like seeing 22-24 mpg....but it would be better if it was true!!
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #6  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by 04markIII
so the a/f seems dead on then? guess the message center won't be right anymore....not that i don't like seeing 22-24 mpg....but it would be better if it was true!!
Yeah,A/F looks good-I don't care for that lean spot at the first of the pull,but since it came right down to 12:1-it's probably fine.
JL
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:12 PM
  #7  
Kyle f's Avatar
Kyle f
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Your Dyo Chart shows your A/F ratio at WOT... or in Power Enrichment mode. This does not give any inication of what your part throttle operations A/F is... which should hol close to 14.7:1.

Your tune has an injector constant that was changed to compensate the computer calculations for the injector size.

Its probably the other tweaks the tuner had to make that is tossing off your message center.

BTW, that Torque curve looks awesome. I hope you are towing something because that kind of torque curve would be a dream to have... Especially if it stays that flat at 1/2 throttle.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #8  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
Originally Posted by Kyle f
BTW, that Torque curve looks awesome. I hope you are towing something because that kind of torque curve would be a dream to have... Especially if it stays that flat at 1/2 throttle.
the only thing i tow is myself, and sometimes the wife and two kids....
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kgonzo23
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
50
Jun 24, 2022 05:56 AM
Mussifto
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
11
Feb 7, 2013 08:44 PM
F0rdFre@K
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
22
May 11, 2010 11:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE