Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

EFI wiring harness source?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #16  
nytling92's Avatar
nytling92
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 5
From: Elizabethtown, Ky.
[I’ve just heard from an outfit called The Detail Zone and they have one that runs $525.00 but requires the 86-88 Mustang computer. It is definitely for Speed Density but in using that particular computer converts it to sequential firing instead of bank firing. In my mind, this would be a wise improvement. In my mind, it should provide better mileage.]

I think all ford EFI including the trucks were sequential firing. I also like this type of firing. I've talked to Scott at the Detail Zone also, very knowledgable. His harnesses would be very clean and it is a matter of plugging it in, no guessing and or refiguring or cutting unused wires out of the harness.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #17  
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 12
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
All the speed density Ford trucks were indeed batch fired where as all the Ford passenger cars were sequential no matter the system used.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #18  
Truxx1956's Avatar
Truxx1956
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 11
From: I live in Leitchfield, KY
Hey Dueller, Did you really mean ALL cars including station wagons and crown vics too? I'm certainly not questioning your knowledge, just clearifying? I have an old '86 Grand Marquis wagon, with EFI and just would like to know what it is?


I'm also wanting to use the wiring from a 1995 E150 van with a 302( this is for another project) with this project I want to use the engine and trans and wiring from the van, and use the top plenum and bottom intake from an old crown vic. I know there is difference, but I've been told if I use the wiring and computer, it wont know the difference? The reason I need to use the crown vic intakes is I dont have hood clearance to use the van intake setup. Thanks for all your help.

Come on all you EFI gurus out there keep this thread alive and put as much info in as possible so as to educate all us dummys
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #19  
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 12
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
Yep, that includes the Crown Vic's.

You shouldn't have a problem with the different intake. Just I would recommend a Mustang upper though as the Crown Vic only has a 50mm upper plenum where as the Mustang has 60mm. The Crown Vic intake flows about 500 cfm with the Mustang at 580 cfm. My 96 Explorer 5.0 intake with 65mm does 690 cfm.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #20  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 74
From: Blue Hill Township
the 95 Explorer intake is a GT40 style. Much better than the standard 5.0 Mustang intake
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #21  
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,882
Likes: 88
From: Durham NC
WOW! Some great info here!
EFI is definitely here to stay, so the sooner we stop fighting it the sooner the aftermarket will adapt to it as well. Fergie, have you checked with Ford Performance?
I understand they are selling stand alone harnesses for EFI engines to encourage hot rodders to use their engines, they are trying to become the CSB of EFI engine swaps. I don't know which engines specifically or pricing tho.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #22  
ferguson777's Avatar
ferguson777
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1
Ford Performance only seems to offer harnesses to enable you to convert to Mass Air, which I already said isn't happening....I wouldn't even want to guess what my local, totally unhelpful Ford partsman would charge for a new replacement harness for the donor application.....


As no one else has been able to offer any sources for harnesses other than those I found & mentioned myself, it look's like I have two options;

1. Economy plan - take apart, the old stock harness I got with the engine. clean it up - clean all the connectors and the appearance of the wires , etc and reuse it.

2. Delux plan - buy a Speed Density (sequential fire) computer from a 86-88 Mustang and the harness from The Deail Zone.

Got a little research to do on this but leaning towards #2.....

Thanks for the input folks.

Later,
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #23  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 74
From: Blue Hill Township
If you want to throw money away then go with option 2. It seems foolish to throw $500+ at a new harness and computer when the one that you have just may well turn out to be perfectly fine.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 04:36 PM
  #24  
RUSTY50F1's Avatar
RUSTY50F1
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: I live in Mustang, OK
This might help I bought it for $94 to put on my LS1 It's a stand alone kit.http://www.goindesign.com/ebay/SA1000.pdf
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 05:14 PM
  #25  
Truxx1956's Avatar
Truxx1956
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 11
From: I live in Leitchfield, KY
Question

Hey Rusty, I can't get that link to work Of course it could be just me??


Mr CMK, You don't happen to have a schematic of what the "bare bones" of the EFI factory harness is and what to cut off and what not to cut off do ya? I have several whole cars to choose from, and the local junkyard is all chevy stuff, so any Ford stuff is CHEAP, cause the guy who owns the yard hates Fords. Thanks for your help with this topic
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 08:39 PM
  #26  
BowlingSuperior's Avatar
BowlingSuperior
New User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bobbytnm

I recently got myself all worked up again about fuel injecting my old Caddy engine. I will have to build my own engine harness, shouldn't be too bad (famous last words). I will be using the MegaSquirt brainbox as a controller (as soon as I can save my pennies up to order the danged thing)
You can always BUILD your own MegaSquirt and make your own harness for around $200.00 - thousands of people have done just that and have been successful. There is no better way to learn how EFI works than to build it yourself - and you will absolutely discover that it is *much* easier than it seems...

Or you can order an assembled unit from diyautotune.com or efisource.com. They also have wiring harnesses available.

Sorry for the "plug" - I am one of the co-creators of the MegaSquirt system. But I will say that just yesterday I got my '54 F100 running on MicroSquirt (a tiny version of the MS-II). Like most EFI setups, it fired right up.

Also, the comparison of SD vs. MAF, the comments here are really good. We support both modes in MS (or a blend of modes for different operating points) and my observation is that MAF will yield great mass airflow numbers, but the sensors are relatively slow (on order of 50 ms) compared to a MAP sensor (around 3 ms). So the MAP sensors (used in SD) are fast and responsive for transients (like throttle stomps) but are also equally reactive to pulsations in the intake manifold due to cylinder filling (which can negatively affect airflow calculations). In the MS system the MAP output sampling is done at the same point on the pressure pulsation curve which helps to minimize the fluxuations, but with a radical cam it can still be very twitchy. In this case a MAF sensor w/ a blend may be a better choice. If you go MAF, grab a Ford or Infiniti Q45 MAF.

- Bruce
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #27  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,980
Likes: 9,828
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
Bruce,

First off, Welcome to the board!! We're glad to have you. Give us some more details of your 54, engine, etc. I'm a firm believer in fuel injection and I'm glad to see that its becoming easier and easier to adapt to non traditional vehicles.

I'm no stranger to fuel injection systems. I worked for about 15 years as a drivability tech at GM dealerships, ten years at a Caddy dealer. Up here at high altitude (New Mexico) we had some real goofy drivability issues that the factories basically didn't care about (less than 10% of cars manufactured are regularly driven at altitude). I'm no stranger to assembling and soldering circuit boards either and am looking forward to starting on the Megasquirt kit.

Its nice to have someone with first hand knowledge of the Megasquirt here on this board. Co-creator huh? way cool!!! I'm sure that I will need to pick your brain a bit when I get started on my system.

Thanks for your input
Bobby
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 08:35 PM
  #28  
BowlingSuperior's Avatar
BowlingSuperior
New User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bobbytnm
Bruce,

First off, Welcome to the board!! We're glad to have you. Give us some more details of your 54, engine, etc. I'm a firm believer in fuel injection and I'm glad to see that its becoming easier and easier to adapt to non traditional vehicles.
OK - now it will be time to run me off of this board... This particular truck has a SBC. But in the context here an engine is an engine, and if you can mount an injector somewhere - above the throttle plates or in the ports, the rest of the install is the same for any engine.

In fact a couple of months ago I witnessed a setup where there was a spacer pipe below the throttle plates on a single-bore carb (used as a throttle plate only) where there were a ring of six injectors around the circumference all pointing inward. It fired right up and ran great. You can read about it in the November HotRod magazine, the Maverick from Spectre performance where they kept on blasting nitrous and running at the track to see the point of failure.

For a miltiport setup on an existing manifold, you can always add injector seats and fuel rails. You can get fuel rails at rossmachineracing.com, they also have a special cutter bit for sale for drilling fuel rails for the injectors.

- Bruce
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 08:45 PM
  #29  
Truxx1956's Avatar
Truxx1956
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 11
From: I live in Leitchfield, KY
Talking

Hey man, I second what Bobby said WELCOME!!!!! We are so glad you could join us truck nuts!!! I don't care what kind of engine you got!! I got a sbc in mine, and I might change and I might not??I like the way you think about this EFI stuff, and am glad you are here for when I get around to that part. This is kind of like a BIG disFUNctional family??


Welcome!!
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #30  
nytling92's Avatar
nytling92
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 5
From: Elizabethtown, Ky.
My favorite part of what Bowling said was "Maverick", I know the car a little bit. We started a club called the MaverickCometGroup and Spectre sponsored our first Nats here in Elizabethtown, Ky. this past July. Anyways, thank you for your imput and I hope you'll be around for a long time to come. I have a couple EFI motors that will need help, I had been looking about The Detail Zone for a harness. They do have some neatly made harness/control board setups, but it is interesting to think I could do it myself.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE