Question for the experts
I recently had some new tires put on my 2003 F150 Supercab 4X4 5.4 and they are a little larger. I went with the P285/70R/17, they look really nice and the truck rides better. My question is I have seen posts about getting one of those "tuners" which will help adjust for larger tires etc., it it worth me getting one since I have the larger tires or should I not worry about it? Am I going to notice worse mpg or notice any shift changes?
P.S. I went with the Bridgestone Dueler REVO tires. I no longer "slip and slide" in the rain like I did with the Goodyear Wranglers.
If you had 265's on before you are gaining just over an inch in height (31.4 - 32,7) so your speedo will be out about 3-5 mph, so if you are cruising at 50 mph , your true speed will be slightly higher. A tuner will correct your truck and Ford could recalibrate it for a fee, I personally would go the tuner route.
What gear ratio do you have? The bigger tires will cause slower acceleration from a stop, and the shift points will change slightly from the added stress of turning a bigger tire. If you have 3.55's like me and the larger tires you will feel some power loss, another reason to get the tuner I think.
So at 100 its off by 2 mph
at 50 its off by 1 mph
If you check your mpg w/out compensating for the 2% then you will notice a difference because if you got 300 miles on a tank then its off by 6 miles. But if you compensate ie add 2% to your mileage when you fill up & divide by the gallons the difference is so small...
I looked for the calculator that said 2% and I could not find it, it used the actual tire dimensions ie compared 265.70.17 to the 285.70.17 and gave me 2%
I found a few that were all 3% but they used the less exact inch measurement.
Either way its 2-5 depending on what you believe. Just add w/e % you believe to your mileage and check it. I doubt it would be any real difference.
So at 100 its off by 2 mph
at 50 its off by 1 mph
If you check your mpg w/out compensating for the 2% then you will notice a difference because if you got 300 miles on a tank then its off by 6 miles. But if you compensate ie add 2% to your mileage when you fill up & divide by the gallons the difference is so small...
I looked for the calculator that said 2% and I could not find it, it used the actual tire dimensions ie compared 265.70.17 to the 285.70.17 and gave me 2%
I found a few that were all 3% but they used the less exact inch measurement.
Either way its 2-5 depending on what you believe. Just add w/e % you believe to your mileage and check it. I doubt it would be any real difference.
http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCal...?action=submit
came out to 3.5% comparing 265-285 p-metric tires.
Establish a baseline for comparison by checking your odometer against interstate mileage markers. A minimum of 10 miles, but much better to check against a 100 mile trip, in order to judge just how far off your odometer actually is. If you decide to reset the computer you should also confirm the accuracy of the change in the same way. It is the odometer reading that's used for MPG calculations, not the speedometer, which is a bit trickier to check. Interestingly, I circled & drove through a 50 MPH construction zone radar setup 3 times & could not see any difference-both indicators were right on 50.
I wouldn't worry much about "any shift changes" based soley upon the relatively small change in tire sizes, especially w/"3.73 gear". FORD invested plenty tuning things just the way they are. If you've got an extra "$300-$400 bucks" burning a hole in your pocket it might be worth it to invest in a tuner to monkey around with to 2nd guess FORD. I'd thought modern FORD computers were somewhat 'adaptive' adjusting to the way an owner drives? Judging by the generous size of the wheel wells I think FORD expected owners to put bigger tires on. When FORD tuner fans start consistantly boasting convincing numbers for significantly improved fuel economy I'll get interested. At this point most of the tuner bravado seems focused on higher RPM shifts that gobble gas & shorten drivetrain life.
Trending Topics
Establish a baseline for comparison by checking your odometer against interstate mileage markers. A minimum of 10 miles, but much better to check against a 100 mile trip, in order to judge just how far off your odometer actually is. If you decide to reset the computer you should also confirm the accuracy of the change in the same way. It is the odometer reading that's used for MPG calculations, not the speedometer, which is a bit trickier to check. Interestingly, I circled & drove through a 50 MPH construction zone radar setup 3 times & could not see any difference-both indicators were right on 50.
I wouldn't worry much about "any shift changes" based soley upon the relatively small change in tire sizes, especially w/"3.73 gear". FORD invested plenty tuning things just the way they are. If you've got an extra "$300-$400 bucks" burning a hole in your pocket it might be worth it to invest in a tuner to monkey around with to 2nd guess FORD. I'd thought modern FORD computers were somewhat 'adaptive' adjusting to the way an owner drives? Judging by the generous size of the wheel wells I think FORD expected owners to put bigger tires on. When FORD tuner fans start consistantly boasting convincing numbers for significantly improved fuel economy I'll get interested. At this point most of the tuner bravado seems focused on higher RPM shifts that gobble gas & shorten drivetrain life.
Shorten drivetrain life? Please, spare us from your pitiful logic of adaptive strategies and on Ford tuning.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
That, all other factors remaining equal, drivetrain life is directly related to how hard equipment gets used is not my "pitiful logic"-its a simple mechanical fact of life. FORD develops conservative compromise tuning that provides for power, economy & longevity. Monkeying w/tuning for power "gains" sacrifices economy & longevity.
Quantifying odometer accuracy against interstate mileage markers is very sound advice. If you think such valid comments are "wild tangents" on this thread, it is a reflection of your poor judgment, not mine. You can very easily "spare" yourself in the future by simply not clicking on, reading or responding to my posts.








