Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

tranny

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:08 PM
  #1  
powens's Avatar
powens
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
tranny

can anyone tell me if putting a bigger tanny pan on an f350 superduty wiil help be for i spend 300.00 bucks.....
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #2  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Moved...hope you have a 7.3 in it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #3  
Zephyr's Avatar
Zephyr
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by powens
can anyone tell me if putting a bigger tanny pan on an f350 superduty wiil help be for i spend 300.00 bucks.....
The Thicker heavier duty pans add some rigidity to the trans case & the fins on the pan may add some cooling, but the extra capasity (in my oppinion) doesnt really do much other than take longer to get hot.

I personaly dont think they are worth the $$
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #4  
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Not sure what your mods are, but IMO you'de be better off installing a bigger tranny cooler than the larger pan if you are concerned about high temps.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #5  
OTTOMATIC's Avatar
OTTOMATIC
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: fl
When I had my transmission rebuilt by a highly recommended rebuilder I asked him to put a MagHytec on which I had purchased. . He was so impressed he became a dealer for them. Btw he also just serviced my tranny after 120,000 on his rebuid. Fluid had never been burnt and he said "C ya in another 100,000." I really believe it was worth the money.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #6  
SolidGround's Avatar
SolidGround
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Likes: 2
From: I'm there!
Originally Posted by Zephyr
The Thicker heavier duty pans add some rigidity to the trans case & the fins on the pan may add some cooling, but the extra capasity (in my oppinion) doesnt really do much other than take longer to get hot.

I personaly dont think they are worth the $$
It's the extra capacity that makes for more cooling.

IMHO, a wise investment.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #7  
PowerstrokeJunkie's Avatar
PowerstrokeJunkie
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,582
Likes: 12
From: 21791
Some people say that adding fluid capacity takes longer to get hot, and some say it takes longer to get cool if you do get it hot. Instead of working the stock cooler with that much extra capacity, invest in a larger transmission cooler. the 6.0 transmission coolers from te 5r110 torqueshift bolt right up and work great
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 08:06 AM
  #8  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,635
Likes: 2,572
From: SE Florida
Originally Posted by powens
can anyone tell me if putting a bigger tanny pan on an f350 superduty wiil help
Help with what? What are you trying to improve?

In my opinion all they help with is draining your wallet. If you want to cool the trans, use a better trans cooler. I can't understand how more fluid helps with cooling, and I do have a couple engineering degrees, and I was a trans cooling engineer for three years.

I can see where more fluid will take longer to get hot, but by the same token it will take longer to cool once it does get hot. A bigger cooler is a MUCH better way to cool the trans.

If you just want to help the way the underside of your truck looks, then I agree these pans look better than the stock pan.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #9  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by strokin_it7.3
Some people say that adding fluid capacity takes longer to get hot, and some say it takes longer to get cool if you do get it hot.

Instead of working the stock cooler with that much extra capacity, invest in a larger transmission cooler. the 6.0 transmission coolers from te 5r110 torqueshift bolt right up and work great
Of course both are true. It takes more energy to get a larger mass hot and it takes more time to cool off a larger mass.

I agree.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #10  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
Help with what? What are you trying to improve?

In my opinion all they help with is draining your wallet. If you want to cool the trans, use a better trans cooler. I can't understand how more fluid helps with cooling, and I do have a couple engineering degrees, and I was a trans cooling engineer for three years.

I can see where more fluid will take longer to get hot, but by the same token it will take longer to cool once it does get hot. A bigger cooler is a MUCH better way to cool the trans.

If you just want to help the way the underside of your truck looks, then I agree these pans look better than the stock pan.
Mark, I think the better question to ask you is this. Why would Ford add an external trans cooler if they could get away with a larger pan? After all, the larger pan is way simpler an install than the plumbing to run an extra cooler.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #11  
SolidGround's Avatar
SolidGround
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Likes: 2
From: I'm there!
Originally Posted by strokin_it7.3
Some people say that adding fluid capacity takes longer to get hot, and some say it takes longer to get cool if you do get it hot. Instead of working the stock cooler with that much extra capacity, invest in a larger transmission cooler. the 6.0 transmission coolers from te 5r110 torqueshift bolt right up and work great
Kris, the 6.0 cooler increases 'capacity' substantially!

touche
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #12  
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
Hotshot
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 17,988
Likes: 207
From: La La Land
Club FTE Silver Member

I agree with both posts #7 and #8 above.

Waste of your time and dollars to replace your pan. Replace your tranny cooler with a larger one.

Pop
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #13  
SolidGround's Avatar
SolidGround
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Likes: 2
From: I'm there!
Oh, and the slower the fluid cools, the better.
Much like engine oil...
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
Hotshot
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 17,988
Likes: 207
From: La La Land
Club FTE Silver Member

Much better not to get it hot in the first place.

Pop
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 07:26 AM
  #15  
ronnshf's Avatar
ronnshf
New User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Question transmission cooler

Neighbors .... I'm no match for your education or experience, but a thought occurs to me that you can evaluate for me. I installed an aluminum transmission pan that increased capacity by 2 quarts on my previous gas powered truck. Transmission temperature went down 20 degrees.

It seems obvious to me that a bigger cooler is a better idea, but if the larger pan is such a poor substitute, why did I get the result that I did?

I think it's this .... the heat source (transmission) varies with load, but if we assume that for any given scenario, the average is going to be roughly constant. So, if the amount of fluid is increased then the heat is applied to a larger volume and the average temp has to go down. Plus, for the time that the oil is sitting in the aluminum pan, the heat is being soaked up by the aluminum. If I remember high school physics ... aluminum takes about twice the energy to increase a degree in temperature than steel.

It's a given that a larger cooler is a much better idea, but I think the aluminum pan has merit (not as much as cooler).

I think that the reason the factory goes for bigger cooler and smaller pan is bang versus buck. The larger pan increases vehicle cost by $20-$30 per vehicle. Bigger cooler might be $5.

Last ... we are hot rodding ( I think) and the dollars spent are to achieve engineering, aesthetic, and impulse goals, not just science.

There it is .... no disrespect intended. I am ready for the pillory.

ron
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.