2008 6.4 built for export
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 826
Likes: 1
From: The Sunshine State
2008 6.4 built for export
I am curious if Ford has designed a 6.4 F series truck for export to countries that don't have emission standards. If they do, I wonder what MPG they are getting minus the emissions crap
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Nipperdog
I am curious if Ford has designed a 6.4 F series truck for export to countries that don't have emission standards. If they do, I wonder what MPG they are getting minus the emissions crap
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Nearly all countries have emissions standards, but none as stringent as the USA, for now. We export trucks to Mexico that are US04 compliant because Mexico recognizes EuroIV emissions and not EPA or CARB. Come 2013 when Europe, Japan, and North America emissions are the same, then we'll see more imports and exports moving freely. Basically, we'll end up with "global" engines.
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Lead Head
I still think they should crack down on gassers, not diesels. Gassers are the ones that need all this emissions crap, not diesels.
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by surf_ox
Thats prob top secret and if you were told guys in black suits would wisk you away to a third world country's gulag and you never be heard from again
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 26,966
Likes: 50
From: Texas
I understand diesels produce their share of emissions, but my concern is the limitations are becoming so restrictive that the mileage is suffering significantly. You would think EPA would be more concerned with the amount of pollutants related to the amount of miles driven, rather than what comes out the tailpipe at a given second.
Also there is a lot more gallons of gas being burned on our nations highways than diesel. You would think they would go after the gassers just to get the most bang for the buck so to speak.
Also there is a lot more gallons of gas being burned on our nations highways than diesel. You would think they would go after the gassers just to get the most bang for the buck so to speak.
Trending Topics
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by F350-6
I understand diesels produce their share of emissions, but my concern is the limitations are becoming so restrictive that the mileage is suffering significantly. You would think EPA would be more concerned with the amount of pollutants related to the amount of miles driven, rather than what comes out the tailpipe at a given second.
Also there is a lot more gallons of gas being burned on our nations highways than diesel. You would think they would go after the gassers just to get the most bang for the buck so to speak.
Also there is a lot more gallons of gas being burned on our nations highways than diesel. You would think they would go after the gassers just to get the most bang for the buck so to speak.
I, too, don't understand why the EPA is so short sided. We clean up a diesel only to have it consume more natural resources. Talk about an exaggerated oxymoron.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 826
Likes: 1
From: The Sunshine State
Originally Posted by rob_nc
Actually, they are...sort of. The CAFE requirements are being raised to push OEMs to produce more fuel efficient vehicles, mainly gassers.
I, too, don't understand why the EPA is so short sided. We clean up a diesel only to have it consume more natural resources. Talk about an exaggerated oxymoron.
I, too, don't understand why the EPA is so short sided. We clean up a diesel only to have it consume more natural resources. Talk about an exaggerated oxymoron.
