Notices

high compression pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 06:06 PM
  #1  
bigeric's Avatar
bigeric
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
high compression pistons

 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 07:42 PM
  #2  
polcat's Avatar
polcat
Elder User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
high compression pistons

I am looking for some 10 to 1 or higher pistons to build a
high hp 390 engine, I am going to use it in a stepside truck for a weekend street rod, so gas mileage is not an issue. I am going to keep the stock crank and rods. My engine is bored .040 over so let me know where I can go to fine some good pistons. I have '68 model heads which are about 71cc-74cc. I will have larger valves installed when I get the engine apart and all my parts.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 01:56 AM
  #3  
karljay's Avatar
karljay
Cargo Master
25 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 18
From: Northern California
high compression pistons

I think the L2291F is in that range. They are forged flat tops w/ about 5.5 valve reliefs. With a zero deck block, you should be about there.

I'd visit www.jegs.com or www.summitracing.com, they should have them listed.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 08:50 PM
  #4  
Sunny_in_hollister's Avatar
Sunny_in_hollister
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Hollister, CA
high compression pistons

Looking at the spec sheet for a 390 +.040" using L2291F pistons, a 74cc head will give you 9.4:1 and a 71 will give you 9.66:1 at a deck clearance of .015"

What I don't know is the head gasket volumne.

Here's the web site that has a copy of the spec sheets:
http://www.gessford.com/cobraparts/images/FMcatalog.htm

A good shop should be able to give you the compression you want with these pistons either by reducing the deck clearance or removing some material from the heads.

Reggie
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2002 | 11:43 AM
  #5  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
high compression pistons

Those pistons have a compression height of 1.7760", and the valve reliefs are approximately 5.5 cc. With a standard height FE block (10.17"), a 390 crankshaft (3.780" stroke), a .040" overbore, a Fel-Pro performance head gasket (.041" compressed height), and 71 cc combustion chambers, your compression ratio is 10.2:1. With 74 cc chambers, your compression ratio is 9.9:1. I'd say those are the pistons you want.

Incidentally, your engine will displace 397 cubic inches, and deck clearance would be .016". You could deck the block .010", which would increase the ratio by 0.2 (10.4:1 with 71 cc heads, and 10.1:1 with 74 cc heads), and bring your pistons to .006" from the deck at TDC. Decking .015" would add another 1/10 of a point to the compression ratio and bring the pistons to .001" down at TDC -- about as close to zero deck as you could ever ask for.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2002 | 05:54 PM
  #6  
Sunny_in_hollister's Avatar
Sunny_in_hollister
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Hollister, CA
high compression pistons

Karlsd,

Why are your numbers so much different from the F/M catalog numbers? When I calculated my compression it came pretty close to the F/M catalog numbers. Now I'm wondering what my compression actually is.

Reggie
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 09:34 AM
  #7  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
high compression pistons

I'm really not positive where the difference comes in. It's fairly simple math. They don't show their calculations, so we can't know how they arrived at the numbers they did. They also don't show what the volume of the valve reliefs is, or what gasket height they used.

My numbers may be slightly on the high side because I assumed that the gasket diameter was the same as the bore. In reality, the cylinder opening in the gasket is larger, which adds combustion space and reduces the compression ratio slightly. Still, it wouldn't account for more than 1/10 of a point. Another possibility is that the valve reliefs are actually larger than 5.5 cc. If the valve reliefs are 10.5 cc in volume, and the head gasket cylinder opening diameter is 4.13" (height of .041" compressed), then I come up with a compression ratio of 9.66:1 for 71 cc head volume, which is what they came up with. I've been told by several people who I think know their stuff, however, that those pistons only have about 5.5 cc of valve relief, which results in a CR of 10.15:1 with a 4.13x.041" gasket and 71 cc heads.

I did notice that the first page includes a statement to the effect that they have changed their method of calculating compression ratios. They don't explain what the change is. I'd like to know, as I know of only one way to correctly calculate static compression ratio.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 11:19 AM
  #8  
Sunny_in_hollister's Avatar
Sunny_in_hollister
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Hollister, CA
high compression pistons

Now were getting somewhere. The gasket volume is 9.2cc according to felpros book - the bore is 4.400" big enough for a 427. I believe the dish is 5ccs. My block has a deck clearance of .007" and a bore of 4.0809" for a Piston to Deck volume of 1.5cc. The heads are 72cc. The volume above the top ring is about .9cc. I just noticed the web site says a dish of 10cc. Maybe that's where we went wrong! That gives me a compression ratio of 9.65:1 - I plan on milling the heads later for an even 10:1.

The catalog said 9.61 for a 71cc head and a deck clearance of .015. I'm glad I ran the numbers again. I even built a spreadsheet for it this time. I had to guess a little on the volume above the top ring, but it's a small number anyways.

Thanks,

Reggie
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 02:45 PM
  #9  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
high compression pistons

O.k. I updated my spreadsheet with a 4.40" bore on the gasket, and for 10 cc of piston relief. I now show a CR of 9.60:1 for 71 cc heads, and 9.33:1 for 74 cc. I did not make any attempt to compensate for volume around the piston above the top ring, but as you point out, it is so small that it can safely be disregarded.

The reason my numbers still don't match yours is the head gasket volume. My math shows that a cylinder of diameter 4.40" and height of 0.041" (the dimensions Fel-Pro gives) has a volume of 10.22 cc, not 9.2 cc. That discrepancy results in my figures being about 1/10 of a point lower, e.g., I calculate 9.69:1 if you assume a gasket volume of 9.2 cc instead of 10.22 cc.

Any idea about the gasket volume discrepancy? Could it be that the 4.40" diameter is when the gasket is not compressed, and that the diameter reduces when compressed due to a squish effect? If so, the gasket bore would need to shrink all the way from 4.40" to 4.18" in order for the volume to equal 9.2 cc. That's a lot of shrinkage, and would make it too small to use on a 4.23" bore 427. What's going on?
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 04:13 PM
  #10  
Sunny_in_hollister's Avatar
Sunny_in_hollister
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Hollister, CA
high compression pistons

Wierd - the catalog says a compress volume of 9.2cc. Using their figures for gasket bore and nominal compressed thickness you get a 10.22cc volume. I agree the bore of the gasket cannot very that much. If the compressed thickness went down to .037 it would cause the volume to shrink to 9.2cc. Maybe email Felpro about the difference?

I checked some of their other gaskets, and the figures are closer but off on the lower side by a few tenths instead of being higher by 1cc. Gottal love that consistancy!

I've got a few more things to do before I pull the heads and have them milled. I'll shoot for a CR of 9.9:1 - 10.1:1 with aluminum heads and pump gas I think i'll work fine.

Thanks for the info,

Reggie
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 11:46 AM
  #11  
mtcwby01's Avatar
mtcwby01
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Broadus USA
high compression pistons

Hey! Just been reading the posts and am wondering how you calculate compression ratio? I know there is a formula and was wondering if anyone that knew it could post it.
Thanks
Ben from Montana
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 12:31 PM
  #12  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
high compression pistons

Sure. You need to calculate the "swept area" and the "combustion area" of a cylinder. Swept area is the volume of the cylinder in which the piston travels on its motion from TDC to BDC (or vice versa). It is the easier of the two to calculate, as it is a simple matter of calculating the volume of a cylinder of known dimensions, which we all learned in geometry. All you need to know if the bore and stroke. The bore equals the diameter of the cylinder, and the stroke equals the height. The formula for volume of a cylinder is V=(pi)*r^2*h, where r is the radius and h is the height. In our case, the radius is one half of the bore, and the height equals the stroke. For example, a 390 cid FE engine has a bore of 4.05" and a stroke of 3.78". If it has been overbored by .040", its bore is 4.05" + .040" = 4.09". r=1/2*4.09=2.045. h=3.78. pi=3.1415926536 (using 3.14 is close enough). Therefore, V=(pi)*2.045^2*3.78=49.7. In other words, the volume of the "swept area" is 49.7 cubic inches. This is also the displacement of one cylinder, so multiplying by the number of cylinders will give you the total displacement of the engine. 49.7*8=397.6 cubic inches -- the true displacement of a "390" FE with a +.040 bore.

The harder thing to calculate is the combustion area. The combustion area is the volume left above the piston at TDC. It basically has four components: the head (or "combustion chamber") volume, the volume of the space created by the head gasket, the volume of the area in the cylinder bore above the piston at TDC, and the volume (positive or negative) that results from the top of the piston not being completely flat. To be extremely precise, you could also calculate the volume of the space around the piston and above the top ring, but that space is so small as to have a negligible impact on the calculation. Besides, to do so, you need to know the true diameter of the piston, which you generally don't.

The volume in the cylinder but above the piston at TDC is calculated the same way as the swept area. The height is also known as "deck clearance" -- it is the distance from the top of the piston at TDC to the deck of the block. The formula is the same: V=(pi)*r^2*h, where r is one half of the bore diameter, and h is the deck clearance in inches. For instance, if the engine is a 390 with a .040" overbore (total of 4.09"), and deck clearance is 0.016", then V = 3.14*2.045^2*0.016 = 0.21 cubic inches.

The head volume is usually expressed in cubic centimeters, or "cc's." The same is true for the gasket volume, and the volume of any dome, dish, or valve reliefs on the pistons. The trick here is that you need to convert these measurements from cubic centimeters to cubic inches. The magic number is 16.38706. Add up the head volume, gasket volume, and valve dome/dish/relief volume in cubic centimeters, and divide by 16.38706 to convert it to cubic inches. For instance, if head volume is 71 cc, gasket volume is 9.2 cc, and valve reliefs occupy 10 cc, then the total is 90.2 cc, which you divide by 16.38706 to convert to 5.5 cubic inches.

Add that to the figure above for volume of the cylinder above the piston at TDC, which we calculated to be 0.21 cubic inches, and your total combustion area volume is 5.71 cubic inches.

Compression ratio (CR) is just the ratio of the volume of the entire cylinder/gasket/head, etc., when the piston is at BDC, to the volume when it is at TDC. CR = (SA+CA)/CA, where SA is the volume of the swept area, and CA is the volume of the combustion area. We already computed SA for our 390 +.040 to be 49.7 cubic inches, and CA to be 5.71 cubic inches. Now just do the math. CR = (49.7+5.71)/5.71 = 9.7 In other words, the compression ratio for this engine is 9.7:1.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 08:56 PM
  #13  
Sunny_in_hollister's Avatar
Sunny_in_hollister
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Hollister, CA
high compression pistons

In the back of the Ford Motorsports catalog there is a long formula for calculating all the volumes with pictures. The short version listed above will get you what you need.

Reggie
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aerostar
10
Aug 21, 2024 11:23 PM
bradphx
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
67
Jan 10, 2024 06:12 PM
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Mar 9, 2016 12:40 PM
miko6810
Modular V10 (6.8l)
9
Jun 4, 2014 06:14 AM
Roachfood
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Mar 11, 2002 10:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE