Notices
1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Auxito

alignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #16  
sdeforest's Avatar
sdeforest
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
I don't know, that's just what I ran into. I guess they wanted it done right and more money.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #17  
skilife17's Avatar
skilife17
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Okay a final update on my truck. I had a different shop check the toe and they did also looked over the front end. They said that the lower ball joint on the drivers side has a small hint of play and the inner tie rod on the passenger side has a little hint of play. Other than those two items the front end is still solid, and they did a full alignment on my truck. They actually said that someone put a small pinhole on the boot to grease the ball joints and it seems that it has worked out.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #18  
steve(ill)'s Avatar
steve(ill)
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,930
Likes: 180
glad it worked out Skil. and i said it before, you CAN align a truck without the Cams on the upper a- frame. a lot of shops will say no, but i tell you it can be done, i have done it. also, how did FORD align it at the factory???????
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 01:38 AM
  #19  
sdeforest's Avatar
sdeforest
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
I didn't say it can not be done. I said they (shops) would not do it. Read. I'm not here for a fight. I'm here for the discussion. I'm telling you my experiance.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 03:49 AM
  #20  
73f350sc's Avatar
73f350sc
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
From: Murray
Frankly.... Im weary of shops that try to scare you into getting service done that you dont need.

I took my 04 Heritage in to get new tires...only new tires... I wanted to get a set of tires that would hold up better on the washboard roads that I sometimes drive...the techs started poking around the front end as if I had asked them to...

Now mind you this is only a month or so after I bought the truck and it only had about 12k miles... so naturally I asked them what they thought they were doing?

Their response.."Well we noticed that it looked like your ball joints were bad so we were checking them....a truck this old should have its ball joints replaced with your mileage"

So I asked them..."Really...I wasnt aware that a 04 with 12k miles would need ball joints already"

The techs demeanor turned right around " Oh its an 04?" He hadnt even looked at the paper work short of 4 tires to know that my truck was what it was...he assumed that it was a much older truck and that it had higher mileage etc.

Long story short...I know never to go to that shop again. Glad it worked out and you didnt let em try and stick ya with something you didnt need.
-Chris
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 02:47 PM
  #21  
Thomas Hutchins's Avatar
Thomas Hutchins
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I had to replacce the Ball Joints in my 97 150 5.4 after 120K+ and they were very loose. No signs of trouble, but the tire shop would not aline it after new tires saying the joints were bad. They were. Changed my own at 1/3 cost or less.

For the sake of your safety and those on the road with you, get them changed now. To drop a ball joint at speed is not a pretty sight and the collateral damage can easly run several times the cost of the joints.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #22  
skilife17's Avatar
skilife17
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Obviously you didn't read my last post I made. I had it looked at a second time and the technician said they are in good shape and don't have to worry about replacing them yet.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #23  
NETJLR's Avatar
NETJLR
New User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
On the 2002, the upper ball joint and A-Arm are all one piece..
its very simple to replace
the lower ball joint is pressed into the lower control arm, though

So, What I did was remove the lower control arm,
and I replaced the bushings and the ball joint and put it back on...
MOOG parts.. and $40 at the machine shop...
otherwise no real problem...
P.S. you have to remove the shock and slowly lower the control arm to release
the spring... do this slowly..the spring just falls out.. (it might hit your foot!!!)

Otherwise rebuilding the front end on a 2002 RWD F150 is very straightfoward...
The only suggestion I can make here is... use factory parts for the tie-rods
(the factory parts are lifetime lubricated - no grease fittings...no grease jobs
The aftermarket (MOOG) require grease fittings , and grease at every oil change..
the same with the ball joints, pitman arm and idler arm...
The factory parts cost alot more.. but no grease jobs!!!!!

Having done it all with MOOG, I would recommend using factory...
The grease jobs get to be a PITA after a while...

GOOD LUCK
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #24  
Bobby82490's Avatar
Bobby82490
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: N. Fort Myers,FL
Originally Posted by NETJLR
On the 2002, the upper ball joint and A-Arm are all one piece..
its very simple to replace
the lower ball joint is pressed into the lower control arm, though

So, What I did was remove the lower control arm,
and I replaced the bushings and the ball joint and put it back on...
MOOG parts.. and $40 at the machine shop...
otherwise no real problem...
P.S. you have to remove the shock and slowly lower the control arm to release
the spring... do this slowly..the spring just falls out.. (it might hit your foot!!!)

Otherwise rebuilding the front end on a 2002 RWD F150 is very straightfoward...
The only suggestion I can make here is... use factory parts for the tie-rods
(the factory parts are lifetime lubricated - no grease fittings...no grease jobs
The aftermarket (MOOG) require grease fittings , and grease at every oil change..
the same with the ball joints, pitman arm and idler arm...
The factory parts cost alot more.. but no grease jobs!!!!!

Having done it all with MOOG, I would recommend using factory...
The grease jobs get to be a PITA after a while...

GOOD LUCK
This is true about greasing a front end is a pain. But the main reason the front end components go bad is because you cant grease them. The orginal grease sits in there forever and goes bad, but if there was fittings you can pump out the old grease and put fresh in. I would rather get MOOG parts over factory for this reason, esp. if you go through alot of water and mud.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nickt916
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
9
Nov 4, 2013 08:46 PM
OleGrouch
Excursion - King of SUVs
3
Aug 17, 2012 10:37 PM
TNT
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
30
May 20, 2011 04:20 PM
86F150302
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Jun 23, 2010 07:25 PM
rpm5099
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
5
Jan 20, 2009 03:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.