Remote Turbo
lets see I am going to work on getting numbers for an inline (one small turbo and one large turbo) feeding each other out of junk yard turbos and my old trampoline frame. I have a friend and neighbor that has a 97 LT-1 camaro that he is going to supply the money to buy anything needed and I am to supply the fabrication welding and labor to build this set up for him it is completely stock now and I figure I can pick up around 90-100 horse with a set up like this and expect under 1000 bucks with a dyno tune once the turbos are on. I will take plenty of pictures of the build and post with final budget and with dyno graph. Does anyone have any old stock turbos with internal waste gates on them they would either donate or sell very cheap? I think the only thing that 150mudder would need to do would to route the intake for the turbo up as high as possible maybe even through the bed of the truck with a cover over it so that water would not be a factor.
yea, i think it would be a tight squeeze for me with the 4x4 and actually going off the road every now and then. i think if i really sat down and figured it out i could find a way to route it. would take alot of fab work. damn 4x4's, gotta love'em.
Fast83, Sounds great. Why do you think that an inline (byturbo) setup would be best?
When you say inline, do you mean both turbos being fed by the exhaust? Just one small and large hooked to the same exhaust pipe? (newbe to turbos and want to learn)
http://www.ststurbo.com/universal_system
Please take lots of pic. It looks like STS uses a oil pump to return the oil to the engine. Do you think that the best or will a pump to supply the turbo be better?
When you say inline, do you mean both turbos being fed by the exhaust? Just one small and large hooked to the same exhaust pipe? (newbe to turbos and want to learn)
http://www.ststurbo.com/universal_system
Please take lots of pic. It looks like STS uses a oil pump to return the oil to the engine. Do you think that the best or will a pump to supply the turbo be better?
I hoping to get more than you can get with a K-N cold air, Cat back and tuner. Done all that and still want more. I dont want to have to spent $4000. plus ether. I just see alot of turbo's on e-bay cheap and thought maybe could build my own.
Originally Posted by Sandbar Norm
Fast83, Sounds great. Why do you think that an inline (byturbo) setup would be best?
When you say inline, do you mean both turbos being fed by the exhaust? Just one small and large hooked to the same exhaust pipe? (newbe to turbos and want to learn)
http://www.ststurbo.com/universal_system
Please take lots of pic. It looks like STS uses a oil pump to return the oil to the engine. Do you think that the best or will a pump to supply the turbo be better?
When you say inline, do you mean both turbos being fed by the exhaust? Just one small and large hooked to the same exhaust pipe? (newbe to turbos and want to learn)
http://www.ststurbo.com/universal_system
Please take lots of pic. It looks like STS uses a oil pump to return the oil to the engine. Do you think that the best or will a pump to supply the turbo be better?
What I am looking to get for this project is 2 junkyard turbos probably one off an import and one off of a deisel truck to get my two sizes I already have some tubing (I hope will be large enough trampoline frame) I will also need two cone style filters. also key things is your fuel will need to be greater so I think a little larger injectors with a boost a pump fuel pump set up and a dyno tune hopefully I will not need but will research further (new MAF).
i think a 30% increase through the whole powerband is very obtainable with 6-10psi of boost for less than 1K. This is what attracted me to doing this project if you look at the car I am doing lets use nice round numbers for ease the LT-1 is 300HP stock 30% is 90 HP so 390HP in a Camaro is easy breaking 12.3 or so now I am not real sure what the actual RWHP of a 97 LT-1
Thanks Fast
So your runinng the turbo's in series (exhaust side). In thru the small turbo to the larger turbo. Wont the smaller turbo restrict the exhaust to the larger so the larger wont spin up to boost? I know that parallel probably would not work either because you would split the exhaust flow between the two turbos. Please tell me more when you get it more of the details workout.
So your runinng the turbo's in series (exhaust side). In thru the small turbo to the larger turbo. Wont the smaller turbo restrict the exhaust to the larger so the larger wont spin up to boost? I know that parallel probably would not work either because you would split the exhaust flow between the two turbos. Please tell me more when you get it more of the details workout.
Originally Posted by Sandbar Norm
Thanks Fast
So your runinng the turbo's in series (exhaust side). In thru the small turbo to the larger turbo. Wont the smaller turbo restrict the exhaust to the larger so the larger wont spin up to boost? I know that parallel probably would not work either because you would split the exhaust flow between the two turbos. Please tell me more when you get it more of the details workout.
So your runinng the turbo's in series (exhaust side). In thru the small turbo to the larger turbo. Wont the smaller turbo restrict the exhaust to the larger so the larger wont spin up to boost? I know that parallel probably would not work either because you would split the exhaust flow between the two turbos. Please tell me more when you get it more of the details workout.
Ok, I cant wait to see some numbers. I dont think that I will be much above 5000 rpm. It would be nice to get into boost over the whole power band of say 1800,2000 to 5500 rpms. I know if it was easy all the auto makers would be doing it.
Originally Posted by fast83
well the newest twin set ups are under the vehicle out of the engine bay so that you 1) have less heat in a very criticle area. 2)have the same exhaust pressure. 3)cheaper to build. 4) do NOT need an intercooler (could stil use one but not nessicary).
For the guy working with the LT1 Camaro, they should be in th 250 RWHP range for a 6 speed. They're also about 10.5 compression with fragile pistons, so I would recommend running VERY low boost one a stock one unless you're going to use some injection or an intercooler. I would also abandon the sequential turbo idea and use two smaller properly sized turbos. Properly sized smaller turbos will spool up quickly and provide enough volume to produce the HP desired. Sequential systems are pretty problematic and I've seen more removed to add a big single turbo than anything else. If the end goal is only to add 90 HP, you can probably do that with two small turbos off of an old turbo caravan. They're pretty cheap on Ebay and have an internal wastegate.
Originally Posted by Mr Dave73
I have to disagree that placing a turbo that far from the engine in a place that it was not designed to go is not far and away the best way to go. There is plenty of room under hood to put two turbos or a large single turbo for these trucks.


